sampa
Veteran
- Oct 6, 2006
- 5,629
- 3,495
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
Something I've been working on since last year. I went from fashion merchandising ambitions in my teen years to the military. And from there out most of it was male-dominated even when I was a teacher in Japan. So I've had to adjust to my environment, which pretty much brought me back to what I was comfortable with in my childhood years of playing with boys. I think I would be closest to someone like Drew Barrymore or Cameron diaz. Casual, playful yet I try to dress Onassis or classic dress styles when I can. There's also a quiet edge of confidence that I exude quietly. I think the biggest attraction I've heard from most guys is my confidence. But I've been working on my exterior and how I will present myself.There's different expressions of femininity. I'm into dresses, heels, and makeup. I'm ultra feminine. If I meet a guy online and Skype I'll get dressed. Physically put on a dress, shoes, makeup, and do my hair. I'll look the same as if we went out. I prefer men who want that. I love meeting that need.
I didn't used to run with makeup but I do now and earrings and even sports dresses. I try to wear skorts over shorts now. I've also been finding more flattering tops. And stick with pinks and feminine colors.
yes I would agree. I've been trying to change my mindset and don't want to ever let myself go. I want to be like that 90-year-old fashion icon..iris. I don't like all of her style but I like that she has found a way to keep young and presentable. Her husband in the documentary seemed to appreciate all those things. More than anything I think he just supports what her passion is.don't believe most men expect a woman to live in dresses and skirts. The majority don't dress that way. All men have aesthetic preferences
Very true.Developing that mindset requires like-minded company. You can't be around people who trumpet your strengths or empowerment all the time.
I think I have a combination of female friends that are both liberal and soft spoken. I lean less towards liberal, but for some reason I have made friends both men and women that are liberal. Even though I disagree with many of their stances, we come to a common ground of respect. I'm not sure why but I don't think I have as close relationships with conservatives. The apologist I know might be one of the exceptions, but I can only handle so much of him talking about politics. Vice versa I let any of my liberal friends know I don't want to talk about it.Vulnerability is equally important. You have to be around others who emphasize the softer elements and the beauty of surrender.
Makes sense. That's pretty much how I've always felt is that I want the guy to take a lead. And one of the things that I have been so frustrated with online dating is so many guys expecting women to take the lead. I'm not very responsive to those types of guys and I just feel like they are not what I'm looking for. At the same time I have found with online dating, when I started initiating questions, guys have to come back to me to say that they were so relieved and happy that I did. And surprisingly those guys actually were the leading type.offer love, support, encouragement, etc. But I'm not the captain. That's his job. Choosing the right suitor is important as you noted.
I'd agree.I've never wanted to be a man. It has no appeal. While I'm strong in my own right, that doesn't diminish my need for him or what he brings to the table. I don't try to fill his shoes. That's not my place.
Especially for marriage. In the workplace it was a totally different matter when I was in male dominated situations. I just wanted to be a worker but so many undervalued my capabilities because of my gender. And different purchases and jokes were applied. It made for a hostile environment.
Same here. I'm not sure about the secure protected and spoiled it's something I would have to think on. I guess myself, I'd be looking for a suitor who is not afraid to get dirty and we work in the yard or land together. Know how to have a nice evening out and get dressed up, maybe even an opera (have an appreciation for the fine arts) but not afraid to get dirty and take care of a yard or land together. Maybe even volunteering to help the church with those things.I'm not a feminist. I want to be secure, protected, and spoiled. I'm a princess. I focus on suitors who want that.
Yes, I can understand this. I've had to do that too but mine usually got to the extreme where they were obsessed and threatening. One guy ended up being fired. And he was 13 years younger than me. He did get rehired a couple years later and I actually went over and shook his hand and welcomed him back to the agency. It was the best thing that I could do and are working around each other was not as awkward. I was also thankful that he found someone and was married. He had some time to grow up.The person I supported made weird comments and one day he said something about 'not acting on feelings' and I knew I had to cut the chord. He'd gone pretty far in his head and nothing I said would convince him otherwise.
Yes, I can understand that. And I continue to debate back and forth if I should keep the friendship with the apologist. Even though we've come to an agreement that I don't see us as suitable for each other. But we have 800 miles separating us.In my mind, it's disingenuous to surround myself with men who desire me. What am I communicating to suitors, my companion, and future spouse? How would I feel if the situation was reversed? From a man's perspective it can appear you enjoy the attention. I hear them discuss it. I don't want to be in that company.
Some good thoughts and stuff to chew on thanks.
Upvote
0