- Oct 12, 2020
- 7,394
- 2,496
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
That verse is not even talking about a human being. It's figurative language. The beast is not a human being because the beast was, is not, and will ascend out of the pit in the future (Rev 17:8). Do you understand that the beast existed before John wrote the book of Revelation? Why do you keep wanting to think the beast is a man? He would have to be over 2,000 years old by now.Revelation 13:6 And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.
It is unreasonable to assume that the one meant here only does this in this age, but once the one meant here is cast into the LOF though, he no longer opens his mouth in blasphemy against God ever again.
But, even if the beast was a man, I don't see your point. How do you figure that people will be able to continue doing the sins they do during this lifetime even after they are cast into the lake of fire? That makes no sense.
That's exactly my point.Granted, some forms of sinning would not be taking place, such as murder, stealing, so on and so on.
Why would them not being able to commit other sins be irrelevant? Also, you have no evidence to show that they would be cursing God for eternity. Until you show that, there's no reason to take you seriously about this.But that's irrelevant if those being punished are cursing God, since that would obviously qualify as sinning, thus sinning undeniably continues throughout all of eternity if one concludes that eternal conscious torment is what the Bible is teaching.
Upvote
0