- Aug 8, 2004
- 11,336
- 1,728
- 65
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Hermas does not refuse advice in the story, in fact at that point he has already received advice from an angel. They are talking about something that has already happened, that he had asked for and got an explanation from an angel. At the quoted point in the story an angel asks why Hermas didn't just ask the Lord for help. Hermas replies that he would have asked the Lord directly if he did not have the angel to ask.That Gal 3:20 is a powerful testimony to the deity of Christ Jesus.
Given that some angels deceive, dressed in light, given we may go directly to God, given the angel spoke the same to Hermas who apparently refused the advice, its clear to me what we should and should not do in the house of God.
So the point of the story was not that Hermas was wrong in asking the angel for help, in fact the angel had already helped him.
The only reason the story is brought up in these discussions is because it shows an example of intercession with person on earth by a Heavenly host (an angel in this case - not a Saint). So it demonstrates the Early Christians would not see asking a being in Heaven as wrong because that is what Hermas did - and it also demonstrates the angels are apparently available to us for at least that much.
Upvote
0