What proof would you need? (2)

[Huram Abi]

We don't know how things happened.
But we have a few theories.
And you know how science is always correcting itself.
And enjoys it.

We know that planets are byproducts of the formation of stars.

 

[Jazer]

rendering them with a 0% chance of being right.

R U suggesting that the Bible is not 100% accurate and true or are we talking about your understanding of the Bible?

 

[Keachian]

R U suggesting that the Bible is not 100% accurate and true or are we talking about your understanding of the Bible?

The Bible doesn't claim to be 100% accurate and true, merely that it is inspired by God and written by men (cf. I Timothy 3:16, I Corinthians 7:12)

 

[ChrisBot]

This thread was split automatically after 1000 replies and this thread has been automatically closed.
The new thread automatically created is here: "What proof would you need? (3)"