iwbswiaihl
Active Member
- May 17, 2022
- 398
- 118
- 82
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
To be truthful, I have been trying to locate where I first replied to your first post that I replied too, and I haven't found it yet. But what you are saying above I would agree to fully, and if that verse is what I first responded to, I don't see why I would have responded with anything but an agree. I think it was one maybe with the 2 Peter reference in it also, I will keep looking. I am 79 and know that my memory is not as good as it use to be, but at least I remember when I forget something, the doctor told me if I remember that I forgot, then its only a sign of old age, but if I don't remember that I forgot things, then I had a serious problem.Ok, let’s review my position on 1 Timothy 2:4
John made the following brief, blanket statement about two specific verses (one of which was 1 Timothy 2:4):
To John’s brief exegesis, I responded with the following statement on 1 Timothy 2:4 …
In short, I AGREED that 1 Timothy 2:4 could be reasonably exegeted, based on the surrounding context of 1 Timothy, to support the opinion that “God desires all to be saved”. Since I had no disagreement with the stated conclusion, I saw no need for a more detailed discussion. I had nothing to add to the brief point that John had made on 1 Timothy 2:4.
Your piling on of cheery-picked verses from other books of the Bible to challenge my agreement with John’s opinion on 1 Timothy 2:4 just leaves me confused about what it is that you expect from me.
see post #1006
Last edited:
Upvote
0