• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What is wrong with Calvinism ?

QvQ

Member
Aug 18, 2019
2,381
1,076
AZ
✟147,890.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Do you think Jesus expects us to love our enemies if he isn't doing it himself?
Jesus may have loved the deniers however:
but whoever denies me before men, I also will deny before my Father who is in heaven. Matthew 10:33
For whoever is ashamed of Me and of My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, of him will the Son of Man also be ashamed when He comes in the glory of His Father with the holy angels. Mark 8:38

Those are strong words. Jesus may have loved His enemies however He said "
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear Hm which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell. Matthew 10:28
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
6,721
2,913
45
San jacinto
✟206,553.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Examining the Gospels (to create a manageable quantity).

God’s Love:
  • [Mark 10:21 NASB95] 21 Looking at him, Jesus felt a love for him and said to him, "One thing you lack: go and sell all you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.”
    • Jesus, as God, counts, but this example was love for ONE INDIVIDUAL rather than a love for all men without exception.
  • [Luke 11:38-44 NASB95] 38 When the Pharisee saw it, he was surprised that He had not first ceremonially washed before the meal. 39 But the Lord said to him, "Now you Pharisees clean the outside of the cup and of the platter; but inside of you, you are full of robbery and wickedness. 40 "You foolish ones, did not He who made the outside make the inside also? 41 "But give that which is within as charity, and then all things are clean for you. 42 "But woe to you Pharisees! For you pay tithe of mint and rue and every [kind of] garden herb, and [yet] disregard justice and the love of God; but these are the things you should have done without neglecting the others. 43 "Woe to you Pharisees! For you love the chief seats in the synagogues and the respectful greetings in the market places. 44 "Woe to you! For you are like concealed tombs, and the people who walk over [them] are unaware [of it.]"
    • At first glance, this might appear to refer to an attribute within God, but from the context it is clearly a love from God that should be within the people Jesus is speaking to … but is absent. That makes it a love FROM God within men rather than a love of all men within God.
  • [John 5:39-42 NASB95] 39 "You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; it is these that testify about Me; 40 and you are unwilling to come to Me so that you may have life. 41 "I do not receive glory from men; 42 but I know you, that you do not have the love of God in yourselves.
    • Again we have a love that SHOULD be in men but is not in a group of specific men. That says nothing about a universal love of God for all men.
  • [John 11:3 NASB95] 3 So the sisters sent [word] to Him, saying, "Lord, behold, he whom You love is sick."
    • Another example that proves Jesus (God) loved a specific man, but not a claim that God loves all men.
  • [John 14:20-23 NASB95] 20 "In that day you will know that I am in My Father, and you in Me, and I in you. 21 "He who has My commandments and keeps them is the one who loves Me; and he who loves Me will be loved by My Father, and I will love him and will disclose Myself to him." 22 Judas (not Iscariot) said to Him, "Lord, what then has happened that You are going to disclose Yourself to us and not to the world?" 23 Jesus answered and said to him, "If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our abode with him.
    • Clearly, the love of God in these verses is real, but it is for some and not for all … not everyone will be saved, but according to this passage, everyone that God loves will be saved.
  • [John 15:9-10 NASB95] 9 "Just as the Father has loved Me, I have also loved you; abide in My love. 10 "If you keep My commandments, you will abide in My love; just as I have kept My Father's commandments and abide in His love.
    • Another passage about God’s love for the saints and not a statement about God’s love for everyone.
  • [John 17:26 NASB95] 26 and I have made Your name known to them, and will make it known, so that the love with which You loved Me may be in them, and I in them."
    • God’s love in “them” (the saints) … nothing about God loves all.
You may be able to produce a verse that either appears to say “God loves all men without exception” or may actually say “God loves all men without exception”. However, searching the Gospels reveals example after clear example of God loving some (and not all) or giving His love to some (and not all).

You challenged people to ”see all scripture of His love” and I did. Let’s contrast that to God’s many commands for men to love:

  • [Matthew 5:43-44, 46 NASB95] 43 "You have heard that it was said, 'YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR and hate your enemy.' 44 "But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, ... 46 "For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same?
  • [Matthew 6:24 NASB95] 24 "No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth.
  • [Matthew 19:19 NASB95] 19 HONOR YOUR FATHER AND MOTHER; and YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF."
  • [Matthew 22:37, 39 NASB95] 37 And He said to him, " 'YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART, AND WITH ALL YOUR SOUL, AND WITH ALL YOUR MIND.' ... 39 "The second is like it, 'YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF.'
  • [Matthew 24:12 NASB95] 12 "Because lawlessness is increased, most people's love will grow cold.
  • [Mark 12:30-31, 33 NASB95] 30 AND YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART, AND WITH ALL YOUR SOUL, AND WITH ALL YOUR MIND, AND WITH ALL YOUR STRENGTH.' 31 "The second is this, 'YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF.' There is no other commandment greater than these." ... 33 AND TO LOVE HIM WITH ALL THE HEART AND WITH ALL THE UNDERSTANDING AND WITH ALL THE STRENGTH, AND TO LOVE ONE'S NEIGHBOR AS HIMSELF, is much more than all burnt offerings and sacrifices.
  • [Luke 6:27, 32, 35 NASB95] 27 "But I say to you who hear, love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, ... 32 "If you love those who love you, what credit is [that] to you? For even sinners love those who love them. ... 35 "But love your enemies, and do good, and lend, expecting nothing in return; and your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High; for He Himself is kind to ungrateful and evil [men.]
  • [Luke 7:42 NASB95] 42 "When they were unable to repay, he graciously forgave them both. So which of them will love him more?"
  • [Luke 10:27 NASB95] 27 And he answered, "YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART, AND WITH ALL YOUR SOUL, AND WITH ALL YOUR STRENGTH, AND WITH ALL YOUR MIND; AND YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF."
  • [Luke 16:13 NASB95] 13 "No servant can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth."
  • [John 8:42 NASB95] 42 Jesus said to them, "If God were your Father, you would love Me, for I proceeded forth and have come from God, for I have not even come on My own initiative, but He sent Me.
  • [John 13:34-35 NASB95] 34 "A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another, even as I have loved you, that you also love one another. 35 "By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another."
  • [John 14:15, 24 NASB95] 15 "If you love Me, you will keep My commandments. ... 24 "He who does not love Me does not keep My words; and the word which you hear is not Mine, but the Father's who sent Me.
  • [John 15:12, 17 NASB95] 12 "This is My commandment, that you love one another, just as I have loved you. ... 17 "This I command you, that you love one another.
  • [John 21:15-17 NASB95] 15 So when they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, "Simon, [son] of John, do you love Me more than these?" He said to Him, "Yes, Lord; You know that I love You." He said to him, "Tend My lambs." 16 He said to him again a second time, "Simon, [son] of John, do you love Me?" He said to Him, "Yes, Lord; You know that I love You." He said to him, "Shepherd My sheep." 17 He said to him the third time, "Simon, [son] of John, do you love Me?" Peter was grieved because He said to him the third time, "Do you love Me?" And he said to Him, "Lord, You know all things; You know that I love You." Jesus said to him, "Tend My sheep.
There's at least one glaring omission in your list of mentions of God's love from the gospels. John 3:16 didn't meet your agenda?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jesus is YHWH
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,366
69
Pennsylvania
✟948,521.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Hm, even if the apostles agree on it? :p I understand what you are saying and I agree.

Haha! Good point!

No, I'm not saying that. Why would God need to wait? God knows our free will decisions outside of time.

Maybe a better way I could have said it is, does God depend on us to make our decisions, so that he can make his?

And do you see how that makes chance a determiner —a cause?

Aha, I see! But if you see that determinism (that was the only word I could come up with to describe your view. Feel free to correct me.) isn't Biblically possible, then what?

Well, sure. If I could see that determinism (or anything else, for that matter) is Biblically impossible, then I could admit it is wrong. (Lol, good luck with that!)

I just believe Adam's sinful nature was inherited, not that Adam's guilt was imputed. Like I said, that sounds, and not only sounds but is from reason unjust to me.

I expect you mean to say, then, that wherever scripture obviously refers to imputation of Adam's sin, it is referring to the inherited fallen nature.

How is mere imputation any more unjust than to apply Adam's sinful nature to people (by 'inheritance' or whatever means he does so), so that they become actual sinners? Did they choose to inherit that sin? Neither is unjust. God has the right. But to claim that either is unjust, is to claim to understand God's level of justice. "Who are you, oh man, to talk back to God?" We are not his peers.

I don't remember if it was to you that I said this to, too, that God may see us corporately more than we want to admit to. One of the things humans tend to do in their self-interest is to separate themselves as individuals when it suits them, and to unite with humanity when it suits them. God doesn't do that to us when it suits us. Adam, as 'federal head' of corporate humanity, sinned, and so humanity corporately, and thus as individuals, are under condemnation.

While I don't claim to have worked out all the specifics of the "death" part of the condemnation, in which I've heard arguments of whether this death referred to is death of this body, or death of the spirit or both or what, I'm pretty sure that too will back up one view or the other between you and me, since, from how I understand things, the imputation of Adam's sin has everything to do with the command that Adam broke, that came with the statement that on the day he disobeys that command, he will surely die. And so, through the sin of one man, Adam, death came upon all.

He also chose from corporate fallen humanity, individuals who comprise the corporate church. And when we are in Heaven, he will absolutely love his Bride, even every individual part of her.
 
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,366
69
Pennsylvania
✟948,521.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Irrelevant and incomplete.
Not at all irrelevant. You want to make an issue of the question of condemnation and she showed your basis inapplicable. You don't know one way or the other, whether in the end Cain is condemned.
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
6,721
2,913
45
San jacinto
✟206,553.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How is mere imputation any more unjust than to apply Adam's sinful nature to people (by 'inheritance' or whatever means he does so), so that they become actual sinners? Did they choose to inherit that sin? Neither is unjust. God has the right. But to claim that either is unjust, is to claim to understand God's level of justice. "Who are you, oh man, to talk back to God?" We are not his peers.
This statement is glaringly pompous, because it is not God's sense of justice that is being questioned it is yours.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: misput
Upvote 0

misput

JimD
Sep 5, 2018
1,026
384
86
Pacific, Mo.
✟173,825.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Not at all irrelevant. You want to make an issue of the question of condemnation and she showed your basis inapplicable. You don't know one way or the other, whether in the end Cain is condemned.
I know that God gave Cain two choices, "sin desires to have you which means you will be condemned if you let it in (continue in it) and "if you do well you will be accepted" means if you believe in me you will be saved. We do not know one way or the other if Cain is condemned because even God does not judge us until we die. The scripture says: Jesus did not come into the world to condemn but to save. John 3:17
John 8:11 She said, "No one, Lord." And Jesus said, "I do not condemn you, either. Go. From now on sin no more."
You are not understanding Romans nor Genesis.

PS: Care to answer my questions in post 3612?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

zoidar

loves Jesus the Christ! ✝️
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2010
7,494
2,677
✟1,042,486.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Jesus may have loved the deniers however:
but whoever denies me before men, I also will deny before my Father who is in heaven. Matthew 10:33
For whoever is ashamed of Me and of My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, of him will the Son of Man also be ashamed when He comes in the glory of His Father with the holy angels. Mark 8:38

Those are strong words. Jesus may have loved His enemies however He said "
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear Hm which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell. Matthew 10:28

Of course! I don't see what that has to do with my post.
 
Upvote 0

zoidar

loves Jesus the Christ! ✝️
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2010
7,494
2,677
✟1,042,486.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Maybe a better way I could have said it is, does God depend on us to make our decisions, so that he can make his?

And do you see how that makes chance a determiner —a cause?

Did God depend on my prayer for Him to answer it? Obviously yes! He couldn't have answered it without me praying. Did God know before time existed I would pray that prayer? Yes, I'm sure He did! Did God decide outside of time He would answer my prayer? I'm not sure. How can I fully know how God does what He does?

I don't see how that makes chance a determiner/cause.

Well, sure. If I could see that determinism (or anything else, for that matter) is Biblically impossible, then I could admit it is wrong. (Lol, good luck with that!)

I can't do that, but I know someone who can.:cool:

I expect you mean to say, then, that wherever scripture obviously refers to imputation of Adam's sin, it is referring to the inherited fallen nature.

You have to quote the many places where Scripture obviously refers to imputation of Adam's sin.

for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,
— Romans 3:23


Why do we fall short of the glory of God? Because Adam's sin is imputed to us, or because we have actually sinned?

How is mere imputation any more unjust than to apply Adam's sinful nature to people (by 'inheritance' or whatever means he does so), so that they become actual sinners? Did they choose to inherit that sin? Neither is unjust.

God holding us responsible for a sin we have not committed is obviously (I think it's obvious) unjust by God. But if Adam's sin lead to a disease which is spread through inheritance, how is that making God unjust? Sure it's not just we inherit the disease, but it's not God's doing. It's not Him being unjust, but it's an "unjust" consequence of life. Some die young, some die old, is that God's fault?

God has the right. But to claim that either is unjust, is to claim to understand God's level of justice. "Who are you, oh man, to talk back to God?" We are not his peers.

Just by living a Christian life we can get a good sense of what is just. I'm of the belief we can know the basic things about God through life.

While I don't claim to have worked out all the specifics of the "death" part of the condemnation, in which I've heard arguments of whether this death referred to is death of this body, or death of the spirit or both or what, I'm pretty sure that too will back up one view or the other between you and me, since, from how I understand things, the imputation of Adam's sin has everything to do with the command that Adam broke, that came with the statement that on the day he disobeys that command, he will surely die. And so, through the sin of one man, Adam, death came upon all.

Neither can I say I know all the details. I don't feel I need to know, but the "how" is intriguing.
 
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,366
69
Pennsylvania
✟948,521.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
I know that God gave Cain two choices, "sin desires to have you which means you will be condemned if you let it in (continue in it) and "if you do well you will be accepted" means if you believe in me you will be saved. We do not know one way or the other if Cain is condemned because even God does not judge us until we die. The scripture says: Jesus did not come into the world to condemn but to save. John 3:17
John 8:11 She said, "No one, Lord." And Jesus said, "I do not condemn you, either. Go. From now on sin no more."
You are not understanding Romans nor Genesis.

PS: Care to answer my questions in post 3612?
You don't know that either one of those things God says to Cain means that. You are guessing.
Down boy, one case at a time. Does condemned always mean too hell? Does it not have other meaning? When God had His discussion with Cain, did He condemn him too hell? Did He not tell him, if you do well , you will be accepted? Which I take to mean believe God. This after Adam's fall, (condemned too hell according to you) and Cain's actual sin un repented of up to this point. Do you think God's basic dealing with man has changed? I know some do. Even if we are condemned, we are not condemned too hell until or unless we die in this condition. Not to mention infants and children.

Of course the word, 'condemned', is not always referring to hell. Yes, sometimes it has other meanings. When God had his discussion with Cain, no, he did not, as far as we know, condemn him to hell. Yes he said if he did well he would be accepted. Which I don't take to mean 'believe God', because I'm not sure what it refers to. Depends on what you mean by 'basic dealing' whether God has changed his ways of basic dealing with man.

I didn't answer before because to me these sound like rhetorical questions. They don't need answered. This is getting silly again.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,221
7,542
North Carolina
✟345,451.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Does condemned always mean too hell?
Does it not have other meaning?
When God had His discussion with Cain,
did He condemn him too hell?
Did God tell Cain he was condemned (John 3:18; John 5:24; Romans 5:18)?
Irrelevant and incomplete.
The record shows otherwise.

Irrelevant?. . .goes to your question: "did God condemn Cain to hell?"

Incomplete?. . .answers the question: "does condemned mean to hell?" Answer: yes.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,221
7,542
North Carolina
✟345,451.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Just repeating the same 3 verses for the 100th time .
Perhaps you could produce three examples of John 3:18, John 5:24, Romans 5:18 presented together.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,221
7,542
North Carolina
✟345,451.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The pattern I see is that death came through Adam's sin and life comes from Christ's righteousness. And that sin reigned even over those that sinned without the Law before Moses.

Are you seeing something else?
That's a somewhat general, as well as somewhat mistaken notion of Romans 5:14.

Mistaken: first, those without the law did not sin (Romans 5:14), because there was no law to sin against, yet they died anyway.
Why?
Adam's guilt was imputed to them.

Secondly, the emphasis of Romans 5:12-17 is not "life," it's justification.

General: specifically, justification is declared righteousness by faith with the imputed/reckoned righteousness of Jesus Christ (Romans 1:17, Romans 3:21, Romans 3:24-25), just as righteousness was imputed/reckoned to Abraham by faith (Romans 4:2-3; Genesis 15:6).

Sinful (first) Adam was the pattern of the righteous (second Adam) Jesus Christ (Romans 5:14) for imputation--of Adam's guilt to all the seed of Adam and of Christ's righteousness to all the seed of Christ (Romans 5:18-19).
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: QvQ
Upvote 0

QvQ

Member
Aug 18, 2019
2,381
1,076
AZ
✟147,890.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Did He not tell him, if you do well , you will be accepted? Which I take to mean believe God.
I don't see any possibility of forgiveness or redemption in Cain's discussion with God.
Even if God allowed Cain to live, Cain was cast out, cursed and marked. And in the end, Cain would die.
What verse in Genesis says that God told Cain if he did well, he would be accepted?
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,221
7,542
North Carolina
✟345,451.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why did you leave out all the Epistles?

Do you think Jesus expects us to love our enemies if he isn't doing it himself?
Yes, because while Jesus knows who are his enemies, we do not.

The one we think is an enemy may well be one that comes to faith and is God's elect, and in reality we would actually be hating our brother, not our enemy.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What verse in Genesis says that God told Cain if he did well, he would be accepted?
Genesis 4:5-7
(5) But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell.
(6) And the LORD said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen?
(7) If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.​
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,221
7,542
North Carolina
✟345,451.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I just believe Adam's sinful nature was inherited, not that Adam's guilt was imputed. Like I said, that sounds, and not only sounds but is from reason unjust to me.
It's not either/or. . .it's both/and.

You are not dealing with sinful Adam as a pattern for the righteous Christ (Romans 5:14).

Adam's sinful nature is inherited, and Adam's guilt is imputed (Romans 5:12-18) as the pattern (Romans 5:14) for Christ's righteousness likewise being imputed (Romans 1:17, Romans 3:21, Romans 3:24-25).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

QvQ

Member
Aug 18, 2019
2,381
1,076
AZ
✟147,890.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Genesis 4:5-7
(5) But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell.
(6) And the LORD said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen?
(7) If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.
All right, God made clear the law before Cain slew Abel.
There wasn't any forgiveness or redemption after Cain slew Abel.
 
Upvote 0

misput

JimD
Sep 5, 2018
1,026
384
86
Pacific, Mo.
✟173,825.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You don't know that either one of those things God says to Cain means that. You are guessing.
Do you have a bible search engine? Look up "do well and well done" what do they usually mean?
Mt 25:21 His lord said unto him, Well done, thou good and faithful servant: thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord.
What does "sin is crouching at the door and desires to have you" mean to you"?
Lu 22:31 And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat:
What does the whole council of scripture teach about these things"? These are certainly not a guessing game to me.


Of course the word, 'condemned', is not always referring to hell. Yes, sometimes it has other meanings. When God had his discussion with Cain, no, he did not, as far as we know, condemn him to hell. Yes he said if he did well he would be accepted. Which I don't take to mean 'believe God', because I'm not sure what it refers to. Depends on what you mean by 'basic dealing' whether God has changed his ways of basic dealing with man.
What does God saying "be accepted" mean to u? The scripture says God is the same yesterday, today and forever. What does that mean to u?

I didn't answer before because to me these sound like rhetorical questions. They don't need answered. This is getting silly again.
The only thing silly is looking for black and white answers for Spiritual questions.
 
Upvote 0

QvQ

Member
Aug 18, 2019
2,381
1,076
AZ
✟147,890.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
What does God saying "be accepted" mean to u? The scripture says God is the same yesterday, today and forever. What does that mean to u?
To be accepted in the context seems to read that if Cain lived by the law, Cain was law abiding. When Cain transgressed the law, then Cain was outlaw.
Outlaw, the unaccepted, is an appalling state of existence.
The civil law is still the same in our time. If a person abides by the law, that person is accepted. If a person breaks the law, he becomes an outlaw. (until caught and punished according to the law)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0