- May 28, 2018
- 14,282
- 6,366
- 69
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Widowed
There is the argument again: "God can do whatever He likes." How does that show we are responsible? And no! Scripture does not confirm your position. Since Scripture affirms personal responsibility, it affirms free will. There is no need for reinterpretation of Scripture, we agree there.
But Adam "robbed a bank" (ate from the tree), and now you say we have the guilt for it... No we don't know it is so. Not all Christians agree with this idea.
Doesn't matter if all Christians agree. Doesn't even matter if ANY Christians agree, as to whether a thing is true or not.
He has every righteous just right to hold us responsible for our enmity against him. Goodness knows! he did so to several generations all at once, because the inclinations of their heart was evil, in the flood. He can dispose of any marred vessel. But I'm not saying he does hold us responsible for inclinations. I'm saying that freely willing to sin IS freewill. And we always choose according to our inclinations.I don't believe God is holding us responsible for inclinations, but for sins we actually commit. How are "freely chosing sin" making us responsible, if what we will to choose is caused by God? To me this sounds like eating the cake and have it too. On one hand affirming our responsibilty and then saying God is the reason we will what we will. I don't see how it's not a contradiction.
If just by the cold logic of causation it is obvious we do not operate on his level, deistically. But more than that, he has the absolute right to paint a picture, tell a story, or whatever else you might use for a parallel notion to his creating. He spoke into creation this whole 6000 (or 15 billion or whatever) years. And it was so when he spoke it. We are creatures, existing in this 'envelope within reality'. You want free will? There it is, we do, just as he wrote, planned, imagined, —spoke into reality. You going to say we operate on his level where he doesn't know and must wait for our decisions before making his?Again how am I responsible for my willful choice, if God is the cause of it?
This feels like a topic for another discussion.
That is something we can discuss. It's an interesting topic, but I don't see it as part of this discussion: "How we can be responsible without free will."
No, it's the same discussion
No, I'm saying God is not inputing guilt to us, but a sinful nature.
"God can do whatever He pleases" ? No, not really. He can't be unjust. That is against His character.
You are mentioning what sounds like "mystery". Sure it can be a mystery. And yes, we don't know everything. But that is not a logical argument for us being responsible.
God doesn't please to be unjust. The claim remains valid, that God can do whatever he pleases. We are incapable of describing or even comprehending rules to which God must comply. Our conceptions are only crutches to help us walk.
My point, again, in my "4 ways" was not to show what we might consider direct logical proof that we are responsible, but ways that we can show the opposite is not true.If God holds us responsible for A He can also hold us responsible for B. Sure He can. But Him holding us responsible, does it make us logically responsible? Where do you find that personal responsibility?
I don't think God imputed Adams sin to us, but his sinful nature.
As for the question of imputed sin, the guilt of it is imputed. The sinful nature is inherited. Perhaps the two always happen together, but that is not the point of the argument, nor does it deny the point of the argument.
Agreed; neither does it mention 'free will' as is meant by it in this contextI give up. . .the same reason no verses mention "Trinity". . .or "sovereignty" regarding God?
Upvote
0