What is the Falsification for Abiogenesis and Theory of Evolution?

[Mr Laurier]

Ah, so, your answer to everything is. " They was just stupid. "

Nope.
Indeed that has never been my answer to ANYTHING. So try again.

Never mind what anyone actually says they got from this teaching, they just don't understand.

The only "teaching" they ever had around evolution, is that it was a lie made up by a satanist/atheist named Charles Darwin, as part of an elaborate plot against Jesus.
A friend of mine actualy knew them in real life. Went to the same school, and graduated the year before the massacre. She endured the same brainwashing that they did, but her parents were not christian fundamentalists. So she had real education at home.

Lame.

... as a four legged horse

 

[Mr Laurier]

Um, yeah, because music and art and creating tools start in England? What?

No. Computers started in England.
Alan Turing WW2. First computer.

 

[Speedwell]

Death before the Fall, just to name one.

No, that's not a good reason. Not even all Christians believe that their was no death before the Fall. But at least you are honest about it--you don't try to pretend that you are defending theism against atheism when you are really only defending your interpretation of scripture.

 

[Speedwell]

No. Computers started in England.
Alan Turing WW2. First computer.

You might go back as far as the 19th century and Charles Babbage, but it's still England.

 

[Mr Laurier]

You might go back as far as the 19th century and Charles Babbage, but it's still England.

Indeed.

 

[AV1611VET]

No, that's not a good reason.

You got a better one?

 

[Frank Robert]

Then you'll have plenty to choose from to let me know what he said that made you think he was being illogical.

Dawkins is great for quote mining.
Famous Creationist Quote Mining

 

[Frank Robert]

It's the logical conclusion for anyone thinking about the implications. And what Dawkins promotes btw.

It is the logical conclusion for the indoctrinated, which is why it is ridiculous to debate religion and science.

 

[Shemjaza]

It's exactly what they get. They might not use those words, but kids aren't dumb, they get it. The columbine shooters sure got it.

I really don't think you want to get into a competition based around "People use this as an excuse to kill, therefore it's wrong." between evolutionary biology and Christianity.

(Just to clarify, I think it's a foolish argument applied to either.)

 

[Mr Laurier]

I really don't think you want to get into a competition based around "People use this as an excuse to kill, therefore it's wrong." between evolutionary biology and Christianity.

(Just to clarify, I think it's a foolish argument applied to either.)

indeed.

 

[renniks]

No. Computers started in England.
Alan Turing WW2. First computer.

How does that relate? The point was we have the intelligence to create computers.

 

[renniks]

It is the logical conclusion for the indoctrinated, which is why it is ridiculous to debate religion and science.

Yes for those indoctrinated with Dawkins and his ilk's garbage.

 

[renniks]

Dawkins is great for quote mining.
Famous Creationist Quote Mining

So, Darwin embraced absurdity. But I already knew that...

 

[Frank Robert]

So, Darwin embraced absurdity. But I already knew that...

I see you can't help yourself.

 

[Frank Robert]

Yes for those indoctrinated with Dawkins and his ilk's garbage.

Dawkins is a scientist and science is based on evidence not indoctrination but thank you for the evidence on the ridiculousness of debating science and religion.

 

[Mr Laurier]

How does that relate? The point was we have the intelligence to create computers.

No. The point was that building computers is what defines humans.
That was your point.

 

[renniks]

Dawkins is a scientist and science is based on evidence not indoctrination but thank you for the evidence on the ridiculousness of debating science and religion.

A scientist who promotes atheism, which is a religion. Ironically, he's the ultimate fundamentalist. He believes what he does and will accept no other explanation of the world.

 

[renniks]

No. The point was that building computers is what defines humans.
That was your point.

Now you are telling me what MY point is? I never said anywhere that building computers defines humans. I am starting to understand how you arrive at your conclusions. You just see what you want to see.

 

[renniks]

I really don't think you want to get into a competition based around "People use this as an excuse to kill, therefore it's wrong." between evolutionary biology and Christianity.

(Just to clarify, I think it's a foolish argument applied to either.)

It's about a lot more than killing. It's about a worldview that brings hopelessness. And evolution is only a small part of it.

 

[Mr Laurier]

A scientist who promotes atheism, which is a religion. Ironically, he's the ultimate fundamentalist. He believes what he does and will accept no other explanation of the world.

A scientist who does science very well.
Atheism is not a religion. It is the lack of a religion.
Dawkins would accept evidence of a god, if such evidence was more than empty shrieking of "BELIEVE OR ELSE!"