Colter
Member
Problem: repentence doesn't undo the damage of a crime. How would it be just to withhold punishment on a belief basis rather than an action basis? Additionally, Christ did not face judgement on our behalf. If he had, then he would still be suffering in hell to this day so that NO ONE HAS TO GO THERE. Which btw, I can't think of anything less just than to have an innocent person suffer for the crimes of others. It would be like drowning an adulterer's baby to absolve them of the adultery; it is more horrific than the crime it is supposedly absolving.
You have good points.
*The Pagan interpretation of the cross as a human sacrifice for sins doesn't make any sense in light of the original gospel Jesus tried to bring to the Jews.
* The theory of original sin is also unjust. Death came to Adam and Eve specifically, it was already natural for man to pass through death.
Upvote
0