• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Weird question about the Theory of Evolution

Naraoia

Apprentice Biologist
Sep 30, 2007
6,682
313
On edge
Visit site
✟23,498.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
My personal scientific advice:

Major in biochemistry or biophysics. Reproduce the laboratory experiments that champion the theory of evolution. Judge for yourself.
Haha, yeah, that's one way...

FWIW, I'm not sure either biochemistry or biophysics makes a particularly good foundation. If you want to do experimental evolution, you should probably be handy with either microbes or a fast-breeding model animal/plant like fruit flies. An understanding of genes, genomes and mutations and a bit of practical knowledge of genetic engineering doesn't hurt either depending on the kind of experiments you want to do, but those are more molecular biology than biochemistry. You probably want at least a basic understanding of population genetics to know the context in which to interpret your experiments, too.

Many people blindly believe "scientists" because they wear white lab coats.
Which is a sad, sad reason to believe anybody and makes you vulnerable to kooks pretending to be scientists.

Follow the money: research grants are given with a specific agenda. A college rarely receive money for grants for controversial research. Thus, controversial topics lack "research" to substantiate themselves. Understand the politics of science, and discern for yourself.
I'm not sure that's a safe way to judge science. For one thing, "unsexy" topics can be ignored by funding agencies despite being perfectly sound science. Conversely, dodgy subjects can get a substantial amount of money and attention.

(See massive NIH-funded clinical trial of chelation therapy for heart disease for a case in point, and in fact the very existence of the NCCAM. Note that I'm not saying alternative medical practices should not be investigated - just that research being funded doesn't automatically mean an idea is, um, uncontroversial.)
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,977
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,005,242.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
My personal scientific advice:

Major in biochemistry or biophysics. Reproduce the laboratory experiments that champion the theory of evolution. Judge for yourself.


Many people blindly believe "scientists" because they wear white lab coats. Do the experiments for yourself. You will have so much authority and power of intellect - to the point where you can categorically and individually challenge the status quo. Remember that scientists are people too. They are capable of lies, deceit, and manipulation. Follow the money: research grants are given with a specific agenda. A college rarely receive money for grants for controversial research. Thus, controversial topics lack "research" to substantiate themselves. Understand the politics of science, and discern for yourself.

:thumbsup:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0