Brah? Sport? Guess you didn't notice I actually have a name? As for "collage" you are not talking to a person who can HEAR the tone and get the point...
Yeah, well I saw from your first post you don't bother your self with reading the thoughts of others, you dont like or wont contemplate any new ideas rather you look for key words like collage sport and brah to set your responses for you. you seem to be driven by emotion rather than topic.. So I custom made the thread So you could full involve yourself with as much busy work as you like.
After all that what you did for me when you assign me with your last straw man argument that had to do with a calvinist pov and skipped over the whole point of the thread.
so to write it like that makes you seem unintelligent.
yeah... I know
Which is why I pointed it out.
which is why I'm playing along.
You're talking about a desire to raise the level of discussion and then writing a word out to people who don't know you, anything about you, nor can hear you and we're expected to understand why you would do that?
You misunderstood from the beginning and now I am having some fun with the type of person the 'beginning' was designed to call out. Again. you dont seem to read anything written you read past everything and assign your own meanings. when you did that here where i was trying to ARTIFICIALLY raise the bar... I set a word trap to have some fun with people who like to busy themselves with building and attacking protocol.
I put a word in play that has NO meaning to the humble at heart, but a stumbling block to the proud. know that if I did not the proud would muddy u the actual topic. I use the word correctly and even displayed how the word could be considered given the methodology in which the OP was constructed giving both sides of the argument Eg: format debate style. None of that means anything however to one who is proud at heart, fore most of them only seek key words to rebuke. they do not bother themselves with content. this is what they enjoy, so for you I provided you more key words to use to rebuke me with. why? because typically a topical discussion with someone like this is pointless. they are far too interested in correcting grammar and checking for spelling error or simply looking for key words to do a verse dump to address anything new or unique.
For example I told you you are not arguing topically it is as if you have not even read the op.. Several times and what do you bring back? collage, sport, brah. which is again a play on the collage level experience. but again a proud man does not see this... he thinks he sees an opportunity to pursue a protocol breaker (someone claiming superior knowledge, but has made these errors is spelling and in grammar so he should not be taken seriously) but in reality... If you don't already know I don't want to be the one to say...
As for your argument... I will just allow you to win your own little debate.
because again the topic has no value to you. you just key words rather thanbother yourself with anything new or challenging.
You're right.... some people have been created to stand with the Lord forever, and others, due to nothing they have or haven't done... have been created to be eternally separated from God or burn in everlasting fire (depending on your take of hell) and all that was because God made it that way.
what a patak! (klingon word) After all of this you still think I am arguing a calvinist position. I am not saying predestination is the oppsite of free will Patak! I am saying SLAVERY IS SLAVES GET TO MAKE CHOICES ALL THE TIME DOES NOT MEAN THEY ARE NOT SLAVES!!!
I will, instead, remain with my head in a hole
this sums you up completely. you will not even read my position unless I liter my work with key words you "programmed" to take offense to!
and continue to believe that God is far more merciful than that, and that He actually looks at our hearts and that He hasn't created a race of mind numbed robots who only serve Him because He forces them to.
please... take this or these posts and show them to someone smarter than yourself and ask them to explain what it is I am sayinf. ask them to show you the difference between the calvinistic POV you have assigned me, verse what it is I am actually saying.
By the way, by the true definition of the word, your doctrine makes God a heretic. But I am not sure you are ready for that discussion yet, Brah.
You are going to feel soooooooo stupid when someone finally explains all of this to you.
Even more so if someone doesn't and you find out the hard way how closed you mind truly is to anything not already in your 'gift bag of thought.'
Good luck sport