• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Was There a Pre-Adamic Race?

Status
Not open for further replies.

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That's one way of lookin' at it, for sure.

Me either if all it is, is "nothing more than a certain number of people with a cranial deformation."

And without considering the architecture associated with them, it's even less visible.

I heard that Kevin Costner discovered the crystal pyramids under the sea when he was swimming down there.
 
Upvote 0

YeShallTread

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2012
1,589
240
✟2,637.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican


There is no shoe to drop. Just your wish for there to be one.

If you consider the FACT of the split in the tribes to be of no meaning...it displays your lack of understanding and wish to remain so. It also shows you wish to ignore many, many Scriptures dealing with the two houses.


Your choice.
 
Upvote 0

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There is no shoe to drop. Just your wish for there to be one.

If you consider the FACT of the split in the tribes to be of no meaning

In the spiritual senses of that matter, yes, all of those things contain GREAT symbolism, types and shadows.

Does it have a single thing to do with genetics or race?

Uh, no. Not one DNA strand worth.

...it displays your lack of understanding and wish to remain so. It also shows you wish to ignore many, many Scriptures dealing with the two houses.

Yer just doin' chicken scratchin' so far.

What is the 'choice' that seems to be escaping me?

s
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian


And thou art delivering it well.

Tis a shame more Christians do not understand the House of Israel and House of Judah.
The House of Judah kept the priestly tribe of Levi and were the ones allowed to rebuild Solomon's Temple

John 2:20 The Judeans then say: "Forty and six to-years was built this Santuary/naoV <3485>, and Thou in three days shall be rousing/raising it"?

Lazarus and the Rich Man - Here a little, there a little - Commentary

LUKE 16:27 "Then he said, 'I beg you therefore, father, that you would send him to my father's house,
28 for I have five brothers, that he may testify to them, lest they also come to this place of torment.' " (NKJV)
The fact that the rich man has five brothers is a vital clue to his true symbolic identity.
Judah, the progenitor of the Jews, was the son of Jacob through Leah (Gen. 29:35). He had five full-blooded brothers: Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Issachar, and Zebulun (Gen. 35:23).

While the significance of this seemingly pointless detail has been neglected by scholars throughout the centuries, you can be certain that it did not escape the notice of the Pharisees and scribes to which Yeshua was speaking. They thoroughly knew their history and were extremely proud of their heritage. Yeshua wanted those self-righteous Pharisees to know exactly who he was referring to with this parable.

This detail cements the identity of the rich man as the House of Judah, the Jews!



.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Tzaousios

Αυγουστινιανικός Χριστιανός
Dec 4, 2008
8,504
609
Comitatus in praesenti
Visit site
✟34,229.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I think so....but then...I have eyes to see.

Of course you do! Why in the world would you admit not having the very thing that self-validates your views and interpretations?
 
Upvote 0

YeShallTread

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2012
1,589
240
✟2,637.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Of course you do! Why in the world would you admit not having the very thing that self-validates your views and interpretations?


Because I have not given you one "view or interpretation." I have given you scripture.
 
Upvote 0

Tzaousios

Αυγουστινιανικός Χριστιανός
Dec 4, 2008
8,504
609
Comitatus in praesenti
Visit site
✟34,229.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Because I have not given you one "view or interpretation." I have given you scripture.

And the circle continues: "I merely repeat what Scripture plainly says."
 
Upvote 0

Godssontoo

Member
Jan 6, 2011
89
28
Gods country Cape Cod
✟22,861.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

So your good at coping and pasting is that what all the verses are about , I use a KJV bible, cite any other bible you like but I am sure if God wanted us to have another bible the KJV would have been phased out by 1612 .

Again the word in question can and does mean replenish , you can argue all you want but that does not change the fact this word was used only twice and both times after the earth was made empty of man excluding those on the ark on one occasion .
 
Upvote 0

Godssontoo

Member
Jan 6, 2011
89
28
Gods country Cape Cod
✟22,861.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

It is evident you do not believe that God destroyed an earth in Genesis 1:2 from a complete dearth of Genesis 1:1 and will seek algorical interpretations to explain clear and concise scripture telling us this .

I already gave you one scripture John 3:13 so how about the Psalm of Moses , psalm 90:1-3 . Since God is not the author of confusion and any mistakes are mans bad interpretation how would you explain Isaiah 45:18 where God said He did not create the world in vain , He formed it to be inhabited . The word vain is the same word used in Genesis 1:2 where the earth was without form and void ( without form is the same word as vain ). That would be a contradiction and God does not contradict Himself.
 
Upvote 0

bornofGod888

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2013
2,030
336
Hidden with Christ in God (Col. 3:3)
✟3,812.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

What are you suggesting?

That I pray to become like you?

No, thanks...especially since you have no idea whatsoever as to what you're going on about.
 
Upvote 0

bornofGod888

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2013
2,030
336
Hidden with Christ in God (Col. 3:3)
✟3,812.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You use the term "we're" improperly. I only addressed you.

As I said many times in this thread....ALL RACES were created by the sixth day...and it was very good.

Actually, I used the term properly. You see, unlike you, I can actually recall what you've said. From your first post on this thread:


Yeah, recalling nonsense and then refuting it with scripture is an affliction which I must bear...

Anyhow, although I've only read about 3 posts on this thread tonight, I've already had my fill of unbiblical error.
 
Upvote 0

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The historical facts aren't to be seen symbolically.

Of course they are. Old Testament scripture anyway. They are categorically SYMBOLIC.

Was there a direct line from Adam to Jesus Christ?

OF COURSE. I accept the literal aspects of the narratives. But that doesn't mean that's ALL they are. There are mountains of SHADOWS and TYPES in the O.T.

Was that found within Israel? Sounds to me like the ruddy line of Adam led to the ruddy line of David who is the flesh ancestor of Jesus Christ. Genetics, DNA? I think so....but then...I have eyes to see.

See what? That Gods Word became flesh and dwelt among us? What does that have to do with anything other than the fact that He was HUMAN?


First of all you've provided no facts whatsoever of what it is you think you are trying to prove. So they tribes were SPLIT? SO WHAT? It's an obvious fact. You think it special for some reason that you noted it? Then you tried to 'carve away' JEWS, which is kind of a pet peeve for me as I very much detest that type of ATTEMPT. So I SHOWED your from scripture that GOD WILL IN FACT SAVE THEM TOO as well as the house of Israel. So what 'errors' you think you see in any of that you've yet to say.

eyes to see? spare me. When I quote that scripture, which I sometimes do, I try to put the EXACT TEXT and what it says along with the DYNAMIC of the matter and the only reason I EVER do it is in hope for a CHALLENGE to test what I THINK I'm seeing. Sort of like a PEER review on a casual basis in this type of forum. I'm also fairly decent at ripping holes through nonsense.

So if you want to put some meat on that substance bone you think yer chewin' on I'm still waiting.

s
 
Upvote 0

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It is evident you do not believe that God destroyed an earth in Genesis 1:2 from a complete dearth of Genesis 1:1 and will seek algorical interpretations to explain clear and concise scripture telling us this .

There is NOTHING openly evident about the destruction of anything in the stretch between Gen 1:1 & 1:2.

If that is your claim then it's purely SPECULATIVE. Not that I'm against speculation in general, but there is certainly no hardline obvious destruction of a prior earth, no.

I already gave you one scripture John 3:13 so how about the Psalm of Moses , psalm 90:1-3 .

What is it you think you are proving by citing John 3:13?

As to Psalm 90:1-3, again, what exactly is it you are trying to get it to say?

That there was a prior earth, prior people? Get to it.
Since God is not the author of confusion

Again, who are you kidding? I know the scripture that says that. But there is also PLENTY of scripture showing that God DOES CONFUSE. So unless you have a good way to sort through those surface conflicts, citing 'God is not the Author of confusion' to justify your as yet largely undefined postulations are somewhat meaningless.

and any mistakes are mans bad interpretation how would you explain Isaiah 45:18 where God said He did not create the world in vain , He formed it to be inhabited .

Which means WHAT? The earth is obviously INHABITED.

I'm getting the distinct feeling that both you and your copart are parroting some other guy who has presumably a much better delivery system on what it is he/she is trying to say because neither of you seem to be able to put your finger on just what it is you think you're trying to prove.

The word vain is the same word used in Genesis 1:2 where the earth was without form and void ( without form is the same word as vain ). That would be a contradiction and God does not contradict Himself.

So what? The world is inhabited. That scripture doesn't change anything or mean that it wasn't inhabited then when it was written as it obviously WAS then too.

shakes head. patience dwindles

s
 
Upvote 0

Godssontoo

Member
Jan 6, 2011
89
28
Gods country Cape Cod
✟22,861.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married


Ask yourself this and then I am done wasting pearls on you , how is that God knew Jerimiah before he was born and hated Esau also before he was born ? Like I said before you have been indoctrinated by the churches of man which for the most part are controlled by Satan . The traditions of man make Gods word void

. Oh and by the way there are , only a couple of places where God sends people strong delusion to believe a lie , God wishes only for all his children to be saved . I also have no copart as you state , I came to this site looking for fellow Christians to teach and be taught and for the most part I find modern day Pharasee and Saducee. One final piece of advice , judgement begins at the pulpit and this is your pulpit so make sure you have your facts straight . For many will stand in front of Jesus professing all they have done for him and Jesus will reply go away I never knew you .
 
Upvote 0

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ask yourself this and then I am done wasting pearls on you ,

I THINK you are trying to PROVE from the text that there were TWO SEPARATE ADAM'S.

And you also seem to think that the complete and utter lack of scriptural evidence for that means you get to pluck the matter out of thin air in the name of pearls and ears that hear.

I prefer to see it in writing rather than imagination.

how is that God knew Jerimiah before he was born and hated Esau also before he was born ?

What does that have to do with TWO ADAM'S???

Like I said before you have been indoctrinated by the churches of man which for the most part are controlled by Satan . The traditions of man make Gods word void

You are actually talking to about the only guy at this board who that wouldn't apply to. Nobody else would even have the patience to listen to (whatever it is) you are trying to convey.

I have no agendas from any 'churches of man.' rolls eyes...


I am an expert on all the quotes you are slinging out that your position is right as I've heard them used in just about every imaginable scenario...

The only thing you're missing is an actual point or two to attach to the hammer.

As stated prior, it appears to me that you were sold an idea of some sort, but can't really eloquently repeat it. And in the process of sale, the salesman used all those hammer texts to push it on you.

Don't feel bad. Christianity is filled with manipulating liars. How much have you invested in that story? (whatever it actually is?)

Get out of it while you have the chance. Or become a disciple of the person who sold it to you so you can at least repeat it accurately so others can understand it.

s
 
Upvote 0

bornofGod888

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2013
2,030
336
Hidden with Christ in God (Col. 3:3)
✟3,812.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
To the OP:

I'm unsubscribing from this thread. I haven't even read the last several pages of posts on this thread, nor do I intend to. I've already documented that the Adam whose offspring is given in Genesis chapter 5 is the same exact Adam from Genesis chapter 1 and that is good enough for me. Hopefully, that reality has helped you in your quest for truth.

Unsubscribing...
 
Upvote 0

YeShallTread

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2012
1,589
240
✟2,637.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
And the circle continues: "I merely repeat what Scripture plainly says."


The circle....study the words, allow they Holy Spirit to teach you the meaning, share that with others, and then have others (some will, some won't some can't) hear that meaning. Then the circle has been completed.
Proverbs 21:18 A false witness shall perish: but the man that heareth speaketh constantly.

Ezekiel 3:10-11 Moreover He said unto me, Son of man, all My words that I shall speak unto thee receive in thine heart, and hear with thine ear. And go, get thee to them of the captivity, unto the children of thy people, and speak unto them, and tell them, Thus saith the Lord God; whether they willhear, or whether they will forbear.

Ezekiel 3:27 But when I speak with thee, I will open thy mouth, and thou shalt say unto them, Thus saith the Lord God; He that heareth, let him hear; and he that forbeareth, let him forbear: for they are a rebellious house.

Matthew 10:27 What I tell you in darkness, that speak ye in light: and what ye hear in the ear, that preach ye upon the housetops.
As I quote Scripture to validate everything I say...I would ask you to provide an example of error. Or...provide an apology.
 
Upvote 0

YeShallTread

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2012
1,589
240
✟2,637.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That was a broad brush remark and had no particular individual in mind...just the group that like to derail a topic they KNOW NOTHING ABOUT and ARE NOT WILLING TO LEARN ABOUT. If you wish to include yourself there...okay. However, I have also specifically referred to you in a certain way so to include others with the use of "we're" would be an improper use.



Yeah, recalling nonsense and then refuting it with scripture is an affliction which I must bear...
You have been unable to refute anything. You can't as it is true. What you bear is your inability to admit error. The "nonsense" your eyes see may be because you are a natural man? [1 Corinthians 2:14]


Anyhow, although I've only read about 3 posts on this thread tonight, I've already had my fill of unbiblical error.
LOL. I know you haven't recognized truths so must wonder what you consider unbiblical.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.