Hi, I'm a newbie at CF - so I hope I'm not messin' where I shouldn't be messin'.......but this is a subject I would like to discuss...so without further ado....
I started to post this in the eschatology forum but was informed that this view is unorthodox and not allowed to be discussed in the Christian Only forums. It should only be discussed here in the Discussion & Debate > Unorthodox Theology section.
I have been a traditional Christian with a confused view of Revelation for the last umpteen years. When I read the Book of Revelation I saw one thing, but my church was telling me another. But I figured they knew what they were talking about. Recently, however, I have studied the Bible more indepth and have come to the conclusion that I was probably right to begin with.
My views, after further study, are that God's Kingdom has already been established. Jesus Christ was the first to rise out of the dead. Jesus was, literally, the "first resurrection." This fact, well attested by the writings of the New Testament, forms the basis for understanding Revelation 20:5-6:
"This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is the one who has a part in the first resurrection; over these the second death has no power" (Revelation 20:5-6)
In Matthew 24, there is a great tribulation (persecution) of the saints which is followed immediately by the coming of Christ, which causes the heavens & earth to be shaken and all the tribes of the earth to mourn (Matt. 24:30). In 2 Thess. 1:6-10, we see the same scenario. The saints were being persecuted. Christ would come and give them relief (AD 66), and at the same time give tribulation to their persecutors. We are talking about two different phases of the tribulation, with Christs return in the middle (the first against the saints in AD 62 - 66, and the second against their persecutors in AD 66-70). Both passages (in their contexts) deal with both phases.
I believe the Millennial view falls into the same trap that the Jews fell into - that is that Christ would come to establish his kingdom on and reign on the earth.
Jesus Christ returned in AD 70 with great fanfare. The destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 was an event with much fanfare. Josephus, a Jewish priest, mentions some loud voices and trumpet sounds being heard, as well as angelic armies being visible in the sky over Judea at the time of the Jewish revolt (AD 66-70). Jews today still commemorate it in some fashion in almost every joyous occasion they celebrate (the shattered goblet at Jewish weddings, and a special fast day every year in August (Tisha b'Av) are two ways in which they still remember the destruction). Rabbi Davis (from White Plains NY), in his opening remarks of his (1978?) lecture on Post-Biblical Judaism, commented that he would begin the study of post-Biblical Judaism with the end. Then he said, he would begin with AD 70., because AD 70 was the end of Biblical Judaism and the beginning of rabbinic or Talmudic Judaism. Josephus, a Jewish priest and one of the ten Jewish generals who started the war with Rome in 66 A.D., gives his eyewitness account of that gruesome judgment which Jesus said was, such as has not occurred since the beginning of the world until now, nor ever shall. (Matt. 24:21) A few days later Jesus (at His trial) said the High Priest & the Sanhedrin, shall see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of power, and coming on the clouds of heaven. (Matt. 27:64) Josephus, Tacitus, Eusebius and the Talmud all record the FACT that Gods presence was perceived at that awesome destruction. They even record that angelic armies were seen in the clouds.
Believe that God's words and Jesus' words are literally true in this situation.
The point of this post is to point out that many religions have twisted the words of the Bible to suit their own purposes. We are, to some degree, formed by tradition. It is difficult and painful to believe that our beliefs could be mistaken. But if we are ever to find the truth - we must explore all religions to extrapolate the truths, which I believe are found in the beliefs they hold most dear. What I mean by that is this: Some believe in pre-tribulation, their whole religion is founded on that. We should examine this belief based on the conclusion that this is an area that convinced them so completely that there must be some truth to it. The same is true for Martin Luther, who staked his very life on the fact that we are saved by God's grace, and not our works. Various religions have been born based on the profoundly held convictions of their founders. All these founders could be considered 'specialists'. They have discovered a secret and based a religion on it because the Catholic Church was reluctant to change. Traditionalists have a terrible time accepting change.
Now, you could apply this theory to those who believe in the Rapture theory - but you must also verify it against the Bible.
Jesus said, And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come (Matt. 24:14). The good news had been preached to all the world by the time the book of Romans and the book of Colossians were written in the first century. (Romans 10:18) Their voice (the voice of those preaching the good news) has gone out into all the earth, their words to the ends of the world. (Col. 1:23) This...gospel...has been proclaimed to every creature under heaven. And shortly after the good news was preached in the whole world in the first century, the end of the Old Testament world came in fiery judgment in A.D. 70, at the destruction of Christs enemies.
Thus the end of Biblical Judaism. Historical records support the tale of the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70.
Now just like 'God's will - will be done' - I have another absolute. Jesus says this in Matthew 16:28: "Truly I say to you, there are some who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom."
What does this mean? I can think of only two questions at this point. Is it literal in the sense that the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 fulfilled this statement. Or is it true in the sense that Jesus' believers would see Jesus' kingdom after they themselves were dead and resurrected?
Traditionalists will rush to say - what about this and what about that - but they must face the possibility that Jesus actually meant what he said.
Now, this may seem a bit confusing to some, and repulsive to others, so I'll end this post here and wait to see if this is of interest to anyone.
Seeking God with all my heart, all my soul, all my mind, and all my strength....
Snashin
We have been living in the "end times" since the resurrection of the LORD which has now spanned over 2000 years.
I started to post this in the eschatology forum but was informed that this view is unorthodox and not allowed to be discussed in the Christian Only forums. It should only be discussed here in the Discussion & Debate > Unorthodox Theology section.
I have been a traditional Christian with a confused view of Revelation for the last umpteen years. When I read the Book of Revelation I saw one thing, but my church was telling me another. But I figured they knew what they were talking about. Recently, however, I have studied the Bible more indepth and have come to the conclusion that I was probably right to begin with.
My views, after further study, are that God's Kingdom has already been established. Jesus Christ was the first to rise out of the dead. Jesus was, literally, the "first resurrection." This fact, well attested by the writings of the New Testament, forms the basis for understanding Revelation 20:5-6:
"This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is the one who has a part in the first resurrection; over these the second death has no power" (Revelation 20:5-6)
In Matthew 24, there is a great tribulation (persecution) of the saints which is followed immediately by the coming of Christ, which causes the heavens & earth to be shaken and all the tribes of the earth to mourn (Matt. 24:30). In 2 Thess. 1:6-10, we see the same scenario. The saints were being persecuted. Christ would come and give them relief (AD 66), and at the same time give tribulation to their persecutors. We are talking about two different phases of the tribulation, with Christs return in the middle (the first against the saints in AD 62 - 66, and the second against their persecutors in AD 66-70). Both passages (in their contexts) deal with both phases.
I believe the Millennial view falls into the same trap that the Jews fell into - that is that Christ would come to establish his kingdom on and reign on the earth.
Jesus Christ returned in AD 70 with great fanfare. The destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 was an event with much fanfare. Josephus, a Jewish priest, mentions some loud voices and trumpet sounds being heard, as well as angelic armies being visible in the sky over Judea at the time of the Jewish revolt (AD 66-70). Jews today still commemorate it in some fashion in almost every joyous occasion they celebrate (the shattered goblet at Jewish weddings, and a special fast day every year in August (Tisha b'Av) are two ways in which they still remember the destruction). Rabbi Davis (from White Plains NY), in his opening remarks of his (1978?) lecture on Post-Biblical Judaism, commented that he would begin the study of post-Biblical Judaism with the end. Then he said, he would begin with AD 70., because AD 70 was the end of Biblical Judaism and the beginning of rabbinic or Talmudic Judaism. Josephus, a Jewish priest and one of the ten Jewish generals who started the war with Rome in 66 A.D., gives his eyewitness account of that gruesome judgment which Jesus said was, such as has not occurred since the beginning of the world until now, nor ever shall. (Matt. 24:21) A few days later Jesus (at His trial) said the High Priest & the Sanhedrin, shall see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of power, and coming on the clouds of heaven. (Matt. 27:64) Josephus, Tacitus, Eusebius and the Talmud all record the FACT that Gods presence was perceived at that awesome destruction. They even record that angelic armies were seen in the clouds.
Believe that God's words and Jesus' words are literally true in this situation.
The point of this post is to point out that many religions have twisted the words of the Bible to suit their own purposes. We are, to some degree, formed by tradition. It is difficult and painful to believe that our beliefs could be mistaken. But if we are ever to find the truth - we must explore all religions to extrapolate the truths, which I believe are found in the beliefs they hold most dear. What I mean by that is this: Some believe in pre-tribulation, their whole religion is founded on that. We should examine this belief based on the conclusion that this is an area that convinced them so completely that there must be some truth to it. The same is true for Martin Luther, who staked his very life on the fact that we are saved by God's grace, and not our works. Various religions have been born based on the profoundly held convictions of their founders. All these founders could be considered 'specialists'. They have discovered a secret and based a religion on it because the Catholic Church was reluctant to change. Traditionalists have a terrible time accepting change.
Now, you could apply this theory to those who believe in the Rapture theory - but you must also verify it against the Bible.
Jesus said, And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come (Matt. 24:14). The good news had been preached to all the world by the time the book of Romans and the book of Colossians were written in the first century. (Romans 10:18) Their voice (the voice of those preaching the good news) has gone out into all the earth, their words to the ends of the world. (Col. 1:23) This...gospel...has been proclaimed to every creature under heaven. And shortly after the good news was preached in the whole world in the first century, the end of the Old Testament world came in fiery judgment in A.D. 70, at the destruction of Christs enemies.
Thus the end of Biblical Judaism. Historical records support the tale of the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70.
Now just like 'God's will - will be done' - I have another absolute. Jesus says this in Matthew 16:28: "Truly I say to you, there are some who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom."
What does this mean? I can think of only two questions at this point. Is it literal in the sense that the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 fulfilled this statement. Or is it true in the sense that Jesus' believers would see Jesus' kingdom after they themselves were dead and resurrected?
Traditionalists will rush to say - what about this and what about that - but they must face the possibility that Jesus actually meant what he said.
Now, this may seem a bit confusing to some, and repulsive to others, so I'll end this post here and wait to see if this is of interest to anyone.
Seeking God with all my heart, all my soul, all my mind, and all my strength....