alertandawake
Active Member
So how is what I said dishonest?
I just read another article now of Brisbane man hospitalized due to blood clots from taking a vaccine (pfizer). So who is going to fork out all the hospital costs?
Why should I trust a product where the manufacturers have protection against liability?
See this is something I don't understand, if you have a defective product on the market, it gets recalled, but if a faulty product causes injury because of the way it was made, the manufacturer could be held liable.
But in the case of vaccines, if they cause injury, the manufactuers are not held liable, not only that the roll out still continues. Why is that?
I just read another article now of Brisbane man hospitalized due to blood clots from taking a vaccine (pfizer). So who is going to fork out all the hospital costs?
Why should I trust a product where the manufacturers have protection against liability?
See this is something I don't understand, if you have a defective product on the market, it gets recalled, but if a faulty product causes injury because of the way it was made, the manufacturer could be held liable.
But in the case of vaccines, if they cause injury, the manufactuers are not held liable, not only that the roll out still continues. Why is that?
Last edited:
Upvote
0