• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Universal Background Checks: If you are opposed, why?

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
24,814
20,906
✟1,729,449.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married


We certainly need to do more work in to "identify the nutjobs" and it will be complicated to say the least. However, no system will be successful unless we have 100% screening as a starting point.

Today, forty percent of gun sales are made with no account for who the buyer is.
 
Upvote 0
S

seeking Christ

Guest
Well I'm no expert on this but I believe most major mental illness is present by the time someone is a teenager. If/when a court rules someone is mentally unstable their data should be entered into NICS and subsequent gun sales should be disallowed.

I disagree with this approach. Mental health is a variable. You don't come down with a cold as a teenager, and have a cold the rest of your life do you?

And the even bigger part of the puzzle is meds to treat such conditions. Some of them trigger some really abnormal behavior, and is what we should be concerned with.
 
Upvote 0

Crusader05

Veteran
Jan 23, 2005
2,354
371
Omaha, NE
✟30,262.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

Right, I'm not an expert on this but if it isn't a permanent condition and someone get's better I think they should be able to have their record cleared.
 
Upvote 0
S

seeking Christ

Guest
That was interesting info someone linked, that 75% of all lifetime cases are apparent by the time one is a teenager. I would hope none of those folks would ever have occasion to be near a gun, but this is what happened in Sandy Hook.

I would think our concern with gun legislation would be those non-lifetime cases. Such that a gun owner is confronted with a decision: if you want to try this med which might help you, you have to be willing to forfeit possession and permit until the Dr says you're off that med and not suffering from withdrawals. Or, you can try this med over here which might not be as helpful, but is "cleaner," and w/o the dangerous side effects. I think this would exert economic pressure on drug companies to stop screwing with people so much, and would be a good thing.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
27,970
16,908
Here
✟1,453,052.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

I agree with this statement.

However, I also would like to make sure that private citizen sales aren't charged for NICS checks as well.

If we're going to expand this, it should be for the right reasons and not a means for the government to make extra cash.
 
Upvote 0

Crusader05

Veteran
Jan 23, 2005
2,354
371
Omaha, NE
✟30,262.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

I agree, I don't want to see the gov't nickle and dime people for private sale checks.
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
29,401
29,075
Baltimore
✟750,063.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
However, I also would like to make sure that private citizen sales aren't charged for NICS checks as well.

Why not? Make the purchaser pay for it. There are lots of checks and application fees that work like that.

-Dan.
 
Upvote 0

Panzerkamfwagen

Es braust unser Panzer im Sturmwind dahin.
May 19, 2015
11,005
21
40
✟26,502.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian

I lost all my guns in a boating accident.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
27,970
16,908
Here
✟1,453,052.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Why not? Make the purchaser pay for it. There are lots of checks and application fees that work like that.

-Dan.

It's not fair to make the seller or purchaser pay an arbitrary fee (for something that's likely computer-based and involves very little human intervention anyway), just as a way for the government to make extra money.

If Obama wants this done, let him fund it out of the tax revenue he's already got. Speaking as a software developer, it's not that hard to write a web/WCF service that would pull records based on social security numbers, and return a boolean value based on a pre-defined set of rules.

Heck, Obama, if you're reading this, hire me as a consultant (Fee is $85/hour), have your people tell me where the database is at, and I'll have it done for you in a week .
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
29,401
29,075
Baltimore
✟750,063.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
It's not fair to make the seller or purchaser pay an arbitrary fee (for something that's likely computer-based and involves very little human intervention anyway), just as a way for the government to make extra money.

It's fair as long as everyone knows the terms up front, right? At least, that's what people tell me about labor agreements.

I'd add that it's fair if it's not also excessive. Something like $25 on a sale of several hundred dollars is not excessive.

It wouldn't have to make extra money for the government, but it could be used to cover the administration of it.

Either way, it's not like this isn't already the MO of many state/local governments. How much is required of the DMV to re-register my car every other year? And yet, I have to pay them when I do.


Well, as a software developer, I'm sure you appreciate the effort needed to tie together multiple sources of data and to be able to handle what could very well be sizeable numbers of transactions per day.

Heck, Obama, if you're reading this, hire me as a consultant (Fee is $85/hour), have your people tell me where the database is at, and I'll have it done for you in a week .

Or maybe you don't.

-Dan.
 
Upvote 0

JCFantasy23

In a Kingdom by the Sea.
Jul 1, 2008
46,753
6,385
Lakeland, FL
✟509,617.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Serious mental illnesses typically manifest in late teens to early 20s. People don't just become schizophrenic at 47.


Schizophrenia is usually teens to age 30 as the norm. Sometimes it's older though.


How would people define mental illness and restriction to firearms? Only schizophrenia? Depression?

People are also not mentioning a leading cause of mental disturbance - post traumatic disorder. This can make a person seriously unbalanced. A lot of people come from war with this. Should vets and ex-military not be allowed to own guns when they come back in case they snap?
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

Why not just ban private sales altogether? If you aren't a commercial vendor, you shouldn't be selling or giving any guns to anyone in the first place.
 
Upvote 0

Vylo

Stick with the King!
Aug 3, 2003
24,768
7,823
44
New Jersey
✟212,869.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Why not just ban private sales altogether? If you aren't a commercial vendor, you shouldn't be selling or giving any guns to anyone in the first place.

Why shouldn't I be able to sell my own guns? That doesn't make sense. Just require I document it and check to make sure the buyer is valid.
 
Upvote 0

dogs4thewin

dog lover
Christian Forums Staff
Red Team - Moderator
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Apr 19, 2012
32,648
6,354
Georgia U.S. State
✟1,083,952.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Background checks aren't any more perfect than any other licensing process. But it's a start, and it would keep nutjobs and felons from legally getting guns.
legally being the key word there.
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Why shouldn't I be able to sell my own guns? That doesn't make sense. Just require I document it and check to make sure the buyer is valid.

Why? Because they're dangerous. We don't allow you to sell potentially dangerous prescription medicine (maybe all prescription medicine). The notion that everyone is going to perform background checks on private sales is ridiculous. How would the law know for sure whether or not you actually preformed the check? How do we keep people from abusing the checks and not just start checking their neighbours or their daughter's new bf?

Besides, the constitution only protects your right to bear arms...not the right to dispense them.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
27,970
16,908
Here
✟1,453,052.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Well, as a software developer, I'm sure you appreciate the effort needed to tie together multiple sources of data and to be able to handle what could very well be sizeable numbers of transactions per day.

Or maybe you don't.

-Dan.

Oh, I do...I've actually worked on programs much more complicated than doing background checks, and I'm saying as an 8 year industry professional, it would be very simple to write and as far as being able to handle a sizeable number of transactions, that's a hardware thing on the webserver, the difficulty of the code that needs to be written doesn't change regardless of whether it gets 1 request per day, or 1 million.

I can explain it in more detail if you'd like?
 
Upvote 0

wmpratt

Ask me why!
Jan 1, 2013
162
2
Visit site
✟15,308.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

It violates the 1st and 4th amendments. That's why oppose background checks.
 
Upvote 0