Trump Told Russia To Get Clinton's Emails. The Same Day, They Obeyed.

[katsung47]

Trump Told Russia To Get Clinton's Emails. The Same Day, They Obeyed.

Amanda Terkel,HuffPost• July 13, 2018

In the morning of July 27, 2016, Donald Trump encouraged Russian hackers to find emails that had been deleted from Hillary Clinton’s private server that she used while serving as secretary of state.

“I will tell you this, Russia: If you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Trump said at a press conference in Florida. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

Russia appeared to be listening and heeded Trump’s call, according to a bombshell revelation on Friday. A grand jury convened by special counsel Robert Mueller indicted 12 Russian intelligence officials for their involvement in hacking the Democratic National Committee during the 2016 election.

The indictment states that on July 27 ? the same day as Trump’s press conference ? Russian hackers, “for the first time,” attempted to break into email accounts, including those used by Clinton’s personal office. Notably, the indictment specifies that the hack happened in the evening, meaning the Russian officials could have done it after Trump’s press conference.

Around the same time, they also tried hacking the Clinton campaign ? although the hacking of the campaign began earlier, before Trump’s call.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-told-russia-clinton-apos-173400281.html

 

[HTacianas]

He told NATO to pay what they agreed to for defense and they compli

 

[Apologetic_Warrior]

Looks like Junk Drawer material. Certainly is not journalism concerned with getting facts straight. Hackers exist all over the world, and an insecure US government owned server is the lottery, like payday for any informed and skilled hacker anywhere in the world. On what date were the server(s) taken offline? I am guessing it was old news by the time it reached Mr. Trump's ears, considering the persons responsible for the security of the server(s) and cell phones.

 

[SoldierOfTheKing]

He was talking about the highly classified email Hillary Clinton stored on her private server, not internal DNC emails concerning the Democratic primary. He was speaking in jest, but in all seriousness Russia probably had those emails for quite some time by this point. Given profound carelessness she showed with them, it's more of a question of who didn't have them.

In any case, the release of the DNC's emails to Wikileaks may have been an embarrassment to the party (if the DNC can be said to have any shame), they contained no government secrets and to talk as though leaking them was a threat to national security is absurd.

 

[Gene2memE]

He told NATO to pay what they agreed to for defense and they compli

What do you get this stuff? Amazing that you not only believe this, but have the gall to write it on a public forum.

 

[Yonny Costopoulis]

“I will tell you this, Russia: If you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Trump said at a press conference in Florida. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

Trump meant Russia "willN'T" be rewarded.

 

[HannahT]

What do you get this stuff? Amazing that you not only believe this, but have the gall to write it on a public forum.

(snickers) The gall? I'm sorry but I had to giggle. People place much worse here.

Some did pay up, and others paid more. Some - of course - we are still waiting to pay what they agreed too. Yet, they all should be paying what they agreed too. They needed to work something out if they could not afford that, and not just sign on the dotted line (as the saying goes) to be apart of NATO.

I think that takes more gall than the comment personally.

This thread is rather old news anyway.

 

[Gene2memE]

Some did pay up, and others paid more.

Which countries paid up what, specifically, in relation to President Trump's demands?
Which countries paid more, specifically, in relation to President Trump's demands?

Did any NATO state offer to raise its commitment beyond the targets already agreed to?

Some - of course - we are still waiting to pay what they agreed too. Yet, they all should be paying what they agreed too. They needed to work something out if they could not afford that, and not just sign on the dotted line (as the saying goes) to be apart of NATO.

Sure, if you make a commitment, you should stick to it. But, and its a large one, NATO spending targets are not binding. They are aspirational.

NATO's European members had already agreed to raise their spending. In 2014. To a 2% level. Over a 10 year period. Trump is trying to retroactively (and dishonestly) take credit for something that was agreed to by NATO years before he ever became president.

 

[Ringo84]

Yep.

Funny how it is that whenever L'il Donny is caught with his hand in the cookie jar (which is nearly on a daily basis), he's always "just joking" or "saying it in jest". And by the way, it's the victims' fault that their server was hacked, which totally exonerates Donny for....some reason.
Ringo

 

[katsung47]

They call Hillary Clinton criminal in 2016 election, the real criminals are Trump and the Feds (FBI and D.O.J.)

The Feds had a coup in 2016 president election. To escort their candidate Trump to the POTUS, they colluded with Russians to hack the emails of Clinton and accused her of "treason" for using private server. That's a strange logic. The whole case was like a mob group (Trump and his group, the Feds) bribed a thief(Russia) to steal money (emails) from victim (Clinton) who put her money in her purse (private server) instead of a safe. Then say Clinton was a criminal because purse was not a safe place for money.

Clinton might make a mistake to put emails in her private server for convenience but that's out of careless, nothing relate to "treason". On the contrary, Trump openly call on Russia for a "hacking" against his campaign rival. Asking help from a hostile country against an US politician, if it's no "treason" then what is it?

Absurd thing is the criminal has stole the seat of presidency, now accuse victim "treason". What happens to the US? What I could say is, US is hijaked by a mob group - the Deep State which rules the nation in rogue's way.

 

[katsung47]

Inside Putin's feared GRU spy network that casts a shadowy web of covert operations across the globe and whose agents are blamed by Mueller for trying to influence the 2016 US election

Special Counsel handed down indictments against 12 members of the GRU

Full name is Main Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces

An afterthought in USSR , it is now country's largest foreign intelligence agency

By ARIEL ZILBER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM and REUTERS 17 July 2018


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...global-network-spies.html?mrn_rm=rta-fallback

 

[katsung47]

Ex-FBI agent: Trump got elected, thanks to Russia
David Knowles,Yahoo News •August 1, 2018

“Yes. I think just alone the hacking, particularly of the DNC and the time to release by WikiLeaks and DCLeaks and others of hacked materials offset the media narrative,” Watts, who has been an outspoken critic of the current president, told “Bots & Ballots” host Grant Burningham.

For many agents in the FBI, Watts said it became clear that the biggest goal for “active measures” was advancing Trump’s presidential bid, in part by utilizing vulnerable social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook.

“By the time 2016 came around, it was very clear that they had four campaign messages that they wanted to push. The first one was very anti-Hillary Clinton, and that was from the beginning. The second one was very pro-Trump,” Watts said. “The third one was when the hacking kicked in, which was that Bernie Sanders got a raw deal from the DNC, and you can see that in these hacked emails. That’s really when we started to see that hacking was starting to power influence. And the last one, which was very minor, was that you still need to show up for Jill Stein. So, the equation was quite clear, it was how do we elevate Trump to the top spot and sort of suppress Clinton turnout and people wanting to support her.”

In “Messing With the Enemy,” his new book on modern cyberwarfare campaigns, Watts said that the election results in traditionally Democratic states like Michigan and Wisconsin prove just how effective the Russian campaign was. Still, Watts notes that because of incomplete social media data and notoriously inaccurate polling, that it’s “almost impossible to prove one way or another whether Russia won the election” for Trump. What is clear is that Trump’s election was itself a victory for Moscow.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/ex-fbi-agent-trump-got-elected-thanks-russia-090006587.html

 

[katsung47]

G.R.U. is a military spy organization. It doesn't work for individual deal. Because Trump has spy back ground, so Russian took over the deal. But could Russian really manipulate US voters? I don't think so. What the Feds needed was an excuse to justify Trump's victory. Russia was just a scapegoat.

To send an unqualified man to the seat of President, they need a rigged election. In US, they pick up president by rigged election because they control the spy system.(FBI) And justify the result by poll because they control the media. (controlled by the Feds too) This time is particular one so they bought Russia to meddle the water.

 

[katsung47]

940. The FBI interfere US president election (12/29/2016)


The FBI played an active role to interfere the US 2016 president election. It hit Democrate's nominee Hillary Clinton by email gate to help its candidate Donald Trump. The evident scene was in July 5 during Chilcot report. "FBI Director Comey potentially gave Clinton’s political rivals some ammunition, conceding there was "evidence of mishandling” classified information and that an FBI employee who did the same “would face consequences for this.”
The FBI didn't indict Clinton because they have no evidence that Clinton intended to do wrong with her email setup."(washingtonpost.com) In fact, this is common for others. Powell had done samething. Why they beat the drum this time on Clinton? Because this time the FBI need a candidate of their own to handle a criminal case. So they determined to help Trump to win the election. This was also the time the Feds made a secret deal with Russian to hack Clinton's computer.

So then Trump started to call for Russian's help. Why not China? Because he knew they had a deal with Russia already.

Donald J. Trump said on Wednesday that he hoped Russian intelligence services had successfully hacked Hillary Clinton’s email, and encouraged them to publish whatever they may have stolen, essentially urging a foreign adversary to conduct cyberespionage against a former secretary of state.

—JULY 27, 2016

Log In

What Russian had hacked? Maybe there was something important. Because in President Debate, Trump intimidated his rival hillary that he'd have special prosecutor and "you'd be in jail".

On 10/28, the FBI director Comey reopened Clintion email investigation, then dramatically dropped the investigation on 11/6. A powerful department of the nation so openly, actively interfere in president election is unprecedented.

 

[katsung47]

941. Payment to Russia for hacking in US election (1/4/2017)

Of course, Russia won't do it for free. There must be a secret deal between the intelligence of the two countries. We outsiders can only see it from some facts.

The secret deal: Hacked email were handed to Wikileaks to issue to hit Hillary Clinton.

The payment of secret deal:

1. Aleppo falls (or "liberated" from Russia side) on 12/15. Resistance and civil withdraw from East Aleppo by bus. Five years fight ends. A big victory for Russia and its allies.

2. Economic interest.

Japan pledges 300 bil. yen economic package at Abe-Putin summit

December 17, 2016

The total value of Japan's contribution in investment and loans, including through agreements between private sector firms, is around 300 billion yen ($2.54 billion), Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Kotaro Nogami said after the leaders' summit.

http://mainichi.jp/english/articles.../023000c#csidx7f0739f16cc5d7e8efc439f0b9b08b7
Copyright

Putin dismissed the notion that he was only interested in getting economic benefits from Japan.

"If anyone thinks we’re interested only in developing economic links and a peace deal is of secondary importance, that’s not the case," he told the same news conference. That's all for the controversial islands. He went Japan just for those business deals.


You may say that's something between Russia and Japan. The Truth is Japan is the pocket slave of the US. If you still remember Trump claims credit for $50 billion investment by Japanese firm and 7 billion from a Taiwan firm. They were puppet nations that have to pay their defense share that Trump demands. Include that payment to Russia for the US sake.