Watch the video:
Liz Harrington on X: "Thousands of fraudulent “presidential only” ballots were injected into the second machine count, with huge margins for Joe Biden This blank ballot pattern appears in at least 8 counties, including Fulton Georgia did not have the votes to justify its original Election “results.”
https://t.co/7Z951zkKOc" / X
Georgia 2020:
Rasmussen Reports on X: "According to The Aftermath document, of the 67,284 ineligible votes cast in the 2020 election, "19,077 votes were assigned to records of voters who no longer lived in Georgia. 48,207 votes were assigned to voters who had moved to a different county within Georgia. Of the 19,077 votes, 16,986 were mail-in ballots. Of the 16,986 mail ballots, 8,984 were inactive according to state data." / X
The issue with this claim is that Georgia did three different recounts, the last one a hand recount (no machines used). In all three recounts, the numbers basically verified the initial totals -- the number of votes did vary a bit (as you would expect) and there were a couple of errors found but not enough to make much of a difference. Sorry, if there were thousands of fraudulent ballots injected to the second machine count, then you'd expect those number to vary considerably from the other counts -- but the numbers were essentially the same in all of them.
As for the out of state voters: Georgia has nearly 90,000 of its citizens serving active duty in the armed forces. Armed Forces members tend not to change their permanent address from their home state, nor are they required to. The exceptions tend to be if they are assigned to a state with no income tax, or they come from one of the high income tax states (like NY or California) and are stationed in a low income tax state. For example, all my time in the military, my permanent residence remained the state I was born in, despite the fact I never lived in my home state during the years I served. I also voted in every Presidential and Congressional election the entire time I was in the military, in my home state that I was not living in. As such, with nearly 90,000 active duty personnel from Georgia, it is unsurprising that almost 20,000 votes were mail-in ballots from people who had "moved from Georgia" -- but were still legal Georgia residents.
Also, as for people voting from a different county, that doesn't change state or national election results -- they were still valid Georgia voters. It wouldn't have change the result of the Presidential election. Other than that: 1) it takes six months to establish residency in Georgia, meaning people who moved in the six months prior to the election could not vote in their new location, so could only cast a ballot where they were previously registered; 2) students typically vote in their home elections, not in their college towns -- so likely would cast absentee ballots and; 3) various people likely were legitimately out of town, in other cities of the state on Election Day, and so needed to vote absentee.
Last, Georgia did conduct a vote audit, performed by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation. They did a signature match (which election workers had previously done). They found a few where they "disagreed" with election workers and didn't think signatures matched but, in every case, following up with the voter they found the person was a legal voter with permanent residence in the location they voted from. I'll admit, the audit was not as large as some Republicans would have liked but it is notable that they did not find fraud from their audit (which they should have if there were thousands of fraudulent votes).
“SUMMARY OF ELECTION FRAUD IN THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN THE SWING STATES
These numbers are determinative and, in all cases, are hundreds of thousands of Votes per Swing State more than I needed to WIN that State. If the Republican Senate does…
And, again, a look at the actual evidence that was done by the DoJ, the various states, and even the firms hired by Trump shows that these claims are largely false; there was no fraud that would have changed the results of the election.
A
new poll by Rasmussen Reports added a new dimension -- rampant cheating by individual American voters.
Cheaters Shouldn’t Win and Winners Shouldn’t Cheat UPDATED - American Thinker
I remember watching the election returns in 2016 as liberal pundits followed the counting and gradually realized that Donald Trump was going to defeat Hillary Clinton. The next day, supporters cried and howled in despair. The tables were turned in...
www.americanthinker.com
We had a thread discussing this topic, which covered a couple of interesting points. First, one of the questions that people point to is the one where a number of people claimed to have dropped a ballot for another person in a dropbox. The issue with this as "proof" of fraud is that several states allow people to do that for family living at the same address, or even for friends (depends on the state). As such, it isn't surprising that in those states a large percentage of people would not only take their own ballot to a dropbox/mailbox, but also that of a spouse. In fact, even in states where it is technically illegal, I suspect many people still do it not realizing it is not allowed.
The other question -- the big "gotcha" where they ask if you know someone who committed fraud is a meaningless question. For example, they might have heard of Ruby Freeman in the news and, while it turns out she did not commit fraud, they believed Giuliani's claims and said "yes" because they had heard of her. Or they may have suspected it of some "liberal" friend but had no knowledge. Asking a question of if you "know someone" who committed election fraud is meaningless -- particularly in an opinion poll where there is no follow up as to who they "know" or what evidence they might have.
I'm sorry, the 2020 election is likely the most investigated election ever and every investigation tends to confirm that there was no major fraud. This includes groups Trump hired and even Trump-supporting groups like the one that performed the audit in Arizona. Of course, in Arizona, the Trump supporters that ran that election found "so much fraud" (to be clear, this use of "fraud" is sarcasm) that Biden won by a larger margin than what Arizona originally claimed.