Trump: 'Many people have said' I should fire Mueller
tulc(is going to make some pop corn and watch!)
)
Fact: previous admin was anti Christian in many ways. Fact: in some areas Trump has been less that way.So no, you don't have any sort of proof the conversation took place but you want to believe it's true so it is?
Well, you should then hope it's as successful as the one he's conducting, because he's getting convictions and results left and right. He seems to have the President so afraid he's thinking of firing him for doing his job so well.
and we all know: "opinions are like noses, we all have them and we all pick our own."
tulc(actually prefers facts over opinions)
Proof?
more proof?
your opinion of what I think isn't based on the truth or facts, it's simply an opinion.
Good to know.
In my opinion you sound like someone in need of some coffee and a couple of doughnuts:
...you mean like him already admitting he paid a inappropriate content star $130,000 hush money to not talk about her affair with President Trump just before the election, length of rope?
tulc(is just curious)
...you do know this thread is about President Trump thinking about firing Mueller, right? I ask because I'm not sure why you want to bring up all those people who aren't President Trump and also have nothing to do with his firing Mueller? If you'd like to discuss past President's affairs I'd suggest starting a thread in the appropriate forum for that.
You do know you first mentioned about the affair when this thread was about firing Mueller not about the affair. So you took this thread off subject so if you want to blame someone blame yourself. The term "length of rope" is silly when we bring it in context that Trump was not the first to do this in office and will not be the last....you do know this thread is about President Trump thinking about firing Mueller, right? I ask because I'm not sure why you want to bring up all those people who aren't President Trump and also have nothing to do with his firing Mueller? If you'd like to discuss past President's affairs I'd suggest starting a thread in the appropriate forum for that.
tulc(is always surprised how hard it is for President Trump supporters to remember what the OP in these threads is)
I saw an interesting editorial, which seems plausible to me. Under the Constitution, the President is the head of the executive. That implies the power to fire. Rules within the executive can't interfere with the President's constitutional authority over the executive. A law might be able to, but even then there's a risk that the law could end up being unconstitutional.
Fine let's look at what I said:
specifically I was responding to the bolded portion when I said:
if you look at what I said it wasn't actually about President Trump's affair, it was addressing information about President Trumps attorney having already admitting to paying the inappropriate content star off. And that was (in context) about the article posted in the OP. You're the who wanted to make it about Presidents having affairs.
Not sure why you're posting this in a response to me when you should be telling that to joshua 1 9, he's the one who brought up "length of rope" not me.
I'm sorry you think that, but since this thread isn't about President Obama or President Bush shouldn't you start another thread to discuss that in if that's what you want to discuss?
I agree, so how about if we simply stick to the OP and discuss that instead of "ropes", past Presidents affairs or my posting habits during President Obama's administration?
It would not be possible on this forum to frame the battle in the US as between good and evil. Therefore no discussion can take place.your opinion of what I think isn't based on the truth or facts, it's simply an opinion.
If you want to discuss what you can't discuss in this forum I'm afraid you're going to have to start a thread about that, this thread isn't about that.
huh...first "ho hum" now "toodaloo" ...sounds like a "Lumineers" song.
