This is the question I have!

[Aaron112]

Says who ? vs what The Creator Almighty God Says!

A world wide flood is completely impossible within the physical constraints of the Earth.

 

[Aaron112]

Not well understood by most scientists nor by the general public at all.
Those who are granted understanding see it all perfectly in harmony with all God's Word, Plan and Purpose - with no spot nor wrinkle, .... no error..... no sin.

Remember what we see today, for people today , is not understood by the natural man - it cannot be understood by the natural (flesh/carnal) man.

Floods leave significant evidence that is well understood, with the additional issues of a flood of the depth to cover mountains has additional levels of devastation that would have left very different evidence to the geological structures we see today.

 

[Aaron112]

Constant and deceptive miraculous intervention are required to make the Flood possible.

God does indeed intervene in everything as He Pleased - He Makes All Things Work Together for Good to those who love God and are called according to His Purpose.

The general public, scientists, religious or government or educated humans without Jesus, are not given their eyes to open to see, to understand, nor can they comprehend anything from God, spiritual.

 

[Apple Sky]

I find it hard believe that the earth is billions of years old

Rock formations which I believe to be the remnants of the Nephilim era.

There are loads of these all round the world.

 

[Herman Hedning]

I find it hard believe that the earth is billions of years old

Rock formations which I believe to be the remnants of the Nephilim era.

View attachment 358893

These are sandstone formations on the Ennedi plateau in Chad. They are indeed many million years old.

View attachment 358894

This is a sculpture in Tuscany, Italy created in the late 1580s by Giambologna. It is thus not very old.

View attachment 358895

This is "Al-Khazneh" in Petra, Jordan. It was created by the Nabateans in the first century BCE, so kind of old but only about 2000 years.

There are loads of these all round the world.

There are indeed loads of rock formations all over the world - some old, some new; some natural, some man made. Nothing strange with that.

 

[Apple Sky]

These are sandstone formations on the Ennedi plateau in Chad. They are indeed many million years old.

This is a sculpture in Tuscany, Italy created in the late 1580s by Giambologna. It is thus not very old.

This is "Al-Khazneh" in Petra, Jordan. It was created by the Nabateans in the first century BCE, so kind of old but only about 2000 years.

There are indeed loads of rock formations all over the world - some old, some new; some natural, some man made. Nothing strange with that.

Wrong again, one of these days I'll get it right

 

[Shemjaza]

Jesus says not to go by what the eyes can see, that the invisible is what is important.

The flesh, carnal, world, - the "seeable" of the physical world, is not to be trusted nor followed nor obeyed not should it ever take the place of trusting Jesus, no, not ever.

Every day we live our lives in the physical world. It's what gives us our food, powers our machines, it's where we meet other people and it's where you heard about Jesus and read the Bible.

This falls under evidence to be avoided as it is misleading, and leading to destruction.

It's evidence that's consistent with what is measurable and testable.

Aer this a support for the devil's work, (the devil has always been a liar and the father of lies.)

Yet it works, it creates systematic and repeatable methods for understanding the world around us.

If someone sees an axe-head float, they do not have to (and won't ) know the method nor the mechanism of how it happeded.
No conclusions wanted nor needed.
Just be honest! We saw the axe-head float!

If you saw an Axe head float that would be evidence that something unusual was happening... maybe you could study it? Maybe you could never understand it... but even if you did see it, it doesn't make any particular belief or conviction more true.

Realize that checking something against something else that is often changed/changing/or in error or not, is not a great method, is it ?

The point of the scientific method is that it is a system of testing to check if something works and can be updated when new information is discovered.

Faith and religious conviction may be correct... but how do you tell if your belief is real or you've misunderstood? How do you even know your belief is the right one when there are other beliefs held by Christians and non Christians with as much conviction as you?

Says who ? vs what The Creator Almighty God Says!

This is based on your religious beliefs, other Christians disagree... how can you say you are right an they are wrong?

That's the advantage a system of testing.

Not well understood by most scientists nor by the general public at all.
Those who are granted understanding see it all perfectly in harmony with all God's Word, Plan and Purpose - with no spot nor wrinkle, .... no error..... no sin.

Remember what we see today, for people today , is not understood by the natural man - it cannot be understood by the natural (flesh/carnal) man.

We can study the physical world, it helps us understand rivers and the oceans. This is practical and repeatable... so if someone says there was a flood that covered mountains we can describe what that means.

I accept that miracles can account for the discrepancy, but then you have a false narrative being placed instead of the evidence left by the flood.

God does indeed intervene in everything as He Pleased - He Makes All Things Work Together for Good to those who love God and are called according to His Purpose.

The general public, scientists, religious or government or educated humans without Jesus, are not given their eyes to open to see, to understand, nor can they comprehend anything from God, spiritual.

It seems like you are claiming some form of supernatural discernment... but how can you demonstrate that you are more correct than other Christians? Let alone convince a non believer like myself who has seen no reason to take your beliefs on faith?

But as I said before, the study of the natural world is effective, it gets results.

 

[David Lamb]

AiG and other professional Creationist organisations I have studied have policies against the use of the scientific method, and I have read dishonest misrepresentations of scientific studies.

Really? Their website includes this as part of AiG's definition of the scientific method:

"Is Answers In Genesis Anti-Science?​

Not at all! Answers in Genesis (like other creationist groups) affirms and supports the teaching and use of scientific methodology, and we believe this supports the biblical account of origins.

Two Kinds of Science​

To understand what science is, it is helpful to distinguish between operational science and origin science and compare how each one seeks to discover truth. Operational science uses observable, repeatable experiments to try to discover truth. Origin science relies on relics from the past and historical records to try to discover truth."

 

[Astrid]

Getting to heaven has nothing to do with being a YEC or not. But how many people have been driven from their faith by YECs? We see YECs in thos forum trying to just that all the time.

if anyone gets to heaven I doubt being an irresponsible conman helps

 

[Astrid]

Realize that checking something against something else that is often changed/changing/or in error or not, is not a great method, is it ?

Checking your own ignorance v observation of
reality is kind of like sanity, isn’t it?

 

[Astrid]

If they have been 'driven' from their faith , it could be good for them, if their faith was in something instead of Jesus Himself.

You are quite sure your faith is not in yourself?

knowing the OneTrue interpretation of what you know is the one true
edition of the one true book- and more than any
researcher on earth is quite the accomplishment.

And you did it without making any effort!

 

[BCP1928]

Really? Their website includes this as part of AiG's definition of the scientific method:

"Is Answers In Genesis Anti-Science?​

Not at all! Answers in Genesis (like other creationist groups) affirms and supports the teaching and use of scientific methodology, and we believe this supports the biblical account of origins.

Two Kinds of Science​

To understand what science is, it is helpful to distinguish between operational science and origin science and compare how each one seeks to discover truth. Operational science uses observable, repeatable experiments to try to discover truth. Origin science relies on relics from the past and historical records to try to discover truth."

Right. That dichotomy is false and inherently anti-science.

 

[dlamberth]

Really? Their website includes this as part of AiG's definition of the scientific method:

"Is Answers In Genesis Anti-Science?​

Not at all! Answers in Genesis (like other creationist groups) affirms and supports the teaching and use of scientific methodology, and we believe this supports the biblical account of origins.

Two Kinds of Science​

To understand what science is, it is helpful to distinguish between operational science and origin science and compare how each one seeks to discover truth. Operational science uses observable, repeatable experiments to try to discover truth. Origin science relies on relics from the past and historical records to try to discover truth."

The geology found in Answers in Genesis is at a kindergarten level, if that. It works great for those who don't know geology or are looking for religious verification of their beliefs. But beyond that, Answers in Genesis doesn't get into the meat of anything geology related. Their mode is to skim across a subject and make claims not backed up by any real geological investigation. But if a person's is at a kindergarten level in how geology science works, how are they going to know the difference? Which leads me to believe that a lot of people are being led astray by Answers in Genesis.

 

[AV1611VET]

Which leads me to believe that a lot of people are being led astray by Answers in Genesis.

Speaking of being led astray, people used to think Thalidomide was a prenatal wonder drug.

 

[chevyontheriver]

Speaking of being led astray, people used to think Thalidomide was a prenatal wonder drug.

Apples and sea apples.

 

[AV1611VET]

Apples and sea apples.

Speaking of sea apples, people were led to believe the Titanic was unsinkable.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Speaking of sea apples, people were led to believe the Titanic was unsinkable.

... yeah, because the company that owned the ship, the people that designed it and the people that built, worked on and traveled on the ship had no reason not believe the Titanic wouldn't sink.

 

[chevyontheriver]

Speaking of sea apples, people were led to believe the Titanic was unsinkable.

Sea apples and sea monkeys.

 

[Aaron112]

Every day the carnal continue dying, apart from and without Jesus.

Every day we live our lives in the physical world.

 

[Aaron112]

Speaking of sea apples, people were led to believe the Titanic was unsinkable.

"... people were led to believe...." most of the world is, was, and will be

led to believe that they do not have to repent, they do not have to turn to God for help, and that it is okay to continue serving demons instead. They don't even give thought to asking God for healing or help or salvation.