• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Theistic Evolution is not Supported by the Scripture!?

Status
Not open for further replies.

2Pillars

Active Member
Oct 3, 2004
168
5
71
✟435.00
Faith
rmwilliamsll said:
Earliest Rice June 11, 1997
by Spencer P.M. Harrington

Rice cultivation began in China ca. 11,500 years ago, some 3,500 years earlier than previously believed, according to Chinese and Japanese archaeologists who studied 125 samples of rice grains, husks, plant remains, and grain impressions in pottery excavated from more than 100 sites along the Yangtze River. The oldest specimens were from sites on the middle Yangtze in Hubei and Hunan provinces, while samples from both upstream and downstream were dated between 10,000 and 4,000 years ago. Syuichi Toyama, an environmental archaeologist at Japan's Kogakukan University, says the evidence suggests rice cultivation began in the middle Yangtze and spread from there.

The new dates also show that rice cultivation preceded millet farming in northern China, which began 7,500 to 7,200 years ago, and may even predate 10,000-year-old evidence of barley cultivation from Netiv Hagdud in Israel. Bruce Smith of the Smithsonian Institution advises caution on the Yangtze rice dates, however, since no morphological studies have been done to determine whether the grain was domesticated. Such rice, he says, has larger seeds than wild varieties and a stronger rachis, or spine, for holding the grains.
quot-bot-left.gif

Sorry, evidence is not admissible due to 3rd Party Hearsay, lack of credibility and proven scientific fact! Nice try though but no cigar!!! :D :D :D

NEXT PLEASE -- I am still waiting ... waiting... waiting...:sleep:
 
Upvote 0

grmorton

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2004
1,241
83
75
Spring TX formerly Beijing, China
Visit site
✟24,283.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
2Pillars said:
Dear grmorton,

Please find the generally accepted definition of "civilization" compliment by Merriam Webster Dictionary per your request.

Main Entry: civ·i·li·za·tion
Pronunciation: "si-v&-l&-'zA-sh&n
Function: noun
Date: 1772
1 a : a relatively high level of cultural and technological development; specifically : the stage of cultural development at which writing and the keeping of written records is attained

Failure to show an Earlier Human Civilization will be the test for all the TE's as well.



And please grmorton you can also ask all of your TE's friends for an answer and come back to me -- or -- better yet, whenever you are all ready to admit your doctrinal (TE's) errors, yo hear? :sleep:
You make me laugh. Lots of hunter gatherers have kept written records, something which is not generally known by those who haven't studied ethnography. We can be sure that the activities I document below, occurred all over the world. The Cherokee, Kiowa and other tribes, kept written records in the form of pictographs painted on hides. The symbols stood for the entire story in themselves. But they are written and they are a record of what happened in the past which helps the tribe remember certain events in their history. Thus, by your definition such peoples are civilized. BTW, the Cherokee were one of the Five Civilized Tribes, having a farming society long before the Europeans came here.

"East of the Mississippi the most important and best known
record is the Walam Olum or 'red score' of the Delawares,
originally discovered in 1820, and published by Dr. D. G. Brinton
in 1885. It consists of a series of pictographs designed to fix
in memory the verses of a genesis and migration chant which
begins with the mythic period and comes down to the advent of the
whites about the year 1610. it appears to be genuine and
ancient, although the written chant as we find it contains modern
forms, having of course been reduced to writing within a
comparatively recent period.
"It is said that the Cherokee seventy years ago had a
similar long tribal tradition which was recited by the priests on
ceremonial occasions. if so, it was probably recorded in
pictographs, but tradition and record alike are not lost." ~
James Mooney, Calendar History of the Kiowa Indians, (Washington,
D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1979), p. 142
**

"West of the Mississippi the first extended Indian calendar
history discovered was the 'Lone-dog winter count,' found among
the Dakota by Colonel garrick Mallery, and first published by him
in 1877. This history of the Dakota was painted on a buffalo
robe by Lone-dog, of the Yanktonai tribe of that convederacy, and
extends over a period of seventy-one years, beginning in 1800.
Subsequent investigation by Colonel Mallery brought to light
several other calendars in the same tribe, some being
substantially a copy of the first, others going back
respectively, to 1786, 1775, and the mythic period.
"In all these Dakota calendars there is only a single
picture for each year, with nothing to mark the division of
summer and winter. As they call a year a 'winter,' and as our
year begins in the middle of the winter, it is consequently
impossible, without some tally date from our own records to know
in which of two consecutive years any event occurred, i.e.,
whether before or after New Year. In this respect the Kiowa
calendars here published are much superior to those of the
Dakota." ~ James Mooney, Calendar History of the Kiowa Indians,
(Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1979), p. 142

"Clark, in his book on Indian sign-language, mentions
incidentally that the Apache have similar picture histories, but
gives no more difinite information as concerns that tribe. he
goes on to say that the Santee Sioux claim to have formerly kept
a record of events by tying knots in a string, after the manner
of the Peruvian quipu. By the peculiar method of tying and by
means of certain marks they indicated battles and other important
events, and even less remarkable occurrences, such as births,
etc.. he states that he saw among them a slender pole about 6
feet in length, the surface of which was completely covered with
small notches, and the old Indian who had it assured him that it
had been handed down from father to son for many generations, and
that these notches represented the history of his tribe for more
than a thousand years, going back, indeed, to the time when they
lived near the ocean. In this case the markings must have been
suggestive rather than definite in their interpretation, and were
probably used in connection with a migration chant similar to
that of the Walam Olum." ~ James Mooney, Calendar History of the
Kiowa Indians, (Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press,
1979), p. 142-143

"This calendar was procured from Dhasan, 'Little-bluff,' nephew
of the celebrated Dohasan who was head chief of the Kiowa tribe
for more than thirty years. The nephew, who died in 1893 at an
advanced age, told Captain Scott that the calendar had been kept
in his family from his youth up, having originally been painted
on hides, which were renewed from time to time as they wore out
from age and handling. the calendar delivered by him to Scott is
drawn with colored pencils on heavy manila paper, as is also the
Sett'an calendar obtained by the author. In both, the
pictographs are arranged in a continuous spiral, beginning in the
lower right-hand corner and ending near the center, the rows of
pictographs being separated from each other by a continuous
spiral. In both, the winter is designated by means of an upright
black bar, to indicate that vegetation was then dead, while
summer is represented by means of the figure of the medicine
lodge, the central object of the annual summer religious
ceremony." ~ James Mooney, Calendar History of the Kiowa Indians,
(Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1979), p. 143
**
"A small notched message-stick of the Seneca, with a hole at
one end for a knotted string, looks exactly like certain Upper
Paleolithic notched bones and some Australian message-sticks. It
contains a marking of days, calling chiefs to a particular
ceremony at a certain time. A small tally-stick of the Onondaga
with twenty-seven notches was a 'condolence' record, listing
twenty-seven chiefs who had died. A tribe of the Sioux at the
end of the eighteenth and beginning of the nineteenth centuries
had a 'slender pole about six feet in length, the surface of
which was covered with small notches, and the old Indian who had
it assured him [Clark] that it had been handed down from father
to son for many generations and that those notches represented
the history of his tribe for more than a thousand years back to
the time when they lived near the ocean.'" ~ Alexander Marshack,
The Roots of Civilization,(New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1972),
p. 139

The above is a WRITTEN record! It is written on a stick. Your definition doesn't say what something has to be written on.

And I absolutely love this one, the message stick--a written form of communication in a culture commonly thought to be illiterate:

"In 1990 I was carrying out Ph.D. field research with the Garawa, a
language group located in the southern inland region of Australia's
Gulf of Carpentaria. One afternoon I was with a party comprising one
older man and two women. it was a relaxing afternoon with the two
women fishing while the man and I discussed the land-use and settlement
activities of past Garawa. during a break after lunch he borrowed my
knife, eventually producing a small carved object called a
Dayowurruwurru, or message stick, an item we had been discussing on and
off over several weeks. This object is illustrated in Figure 1. It is
12 centimetres long, 1.5 centimetres in diameter and cylindrical in
cross-section. It has several incised lines.
"My informant then explained the meaning and use of this item.
The message stick was given to a person who was to carry it to its
recipients. In addition to delivering the message stick itself, with
its text implicit in its inscribed "symbols', the deliverer was to tell
the recipient of the message. The message stick was, therefore,
largely a mnemonic device although it also seems to have acted in part
as a 'contract' between the sender, the carrier and the recipient.
"the example that accompanied the message stick described in
Figure 1 is as follows. Two men wish to meet another two men at a
specific location at some time in the future. Two incised lines at one
end of the message stick represent the sender and his brother while two
incised lines at the other end of the stick represent the recipients.
the single pit in the centre represents the location. The deliverer
was to tell the recipients of the location and time of the meeting.
"This all made perfect sense. I then asked 'what are these
marks?', referring to the circumscribing and diagonal symbols. I
expected these marks to have a particular set of meanings or to serve
as some identifier. My informant looked at me and said, quite
straightforwardly, 'Some lines'." ~Michael Pickering, "The Message
Stick: An Anecdote", Rock Art Research 14(1997):1, p. 59


Secondly, the Sumerians began writing in 3100 BC. There is writing in Pakistan from 3300 BC and from Egypt in 3250 BC. Neither of these places, is in Mesopotamia. see http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_334000/334517.stm
and
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/16/science/social/16SCOR.html
accessed 4-19-02

And now, in China, tortoise shells have beenfound with symbols used in early Chinese writing and the shells date to 6600 BC. I pointed this out earlier but you simply don't say anything about it. Things simply aren't as simply as you try to make them.

And the oldest standing temple building in the world, is 500-1000 years prior to the Sumerian civilization. It is from Malta. They had quite a civilization there.

I can only conclude, that like the ugly step sisters of Cinderella, you are trying to fit your theory into the wrong shoeful of data.
 
Upvote 0

Vance

Contributor
Jul 16, 2003
6,666
264
59
✟30,780.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But still, 2Pillars, your premise is that there was no sign of human intelligence in any society before the neolithic agricultural revolution. This is just wrong. You are saying that the first sign of human intelligence was with the first "civilizations"? What in the world is that based on?

What do you do with all of the complex hunter/gatherer cultures with identical bodies to ourselves, who lived in semi-permanent complexes of up to 500 people or so, which had regular trading with other groups from far away, which buried their dead and produced amazing art, etc, etc? In short, there were many, many complex societies and cultures before there were any "civilizations". You are just taking a word that historians use to identify one particular level of such society and culture, and reading it to mean ANY society and culture.

What about the fact that this transition from hunter/gatherer societies occured not overnight, but over thousands of years, as the plentiful herd game wore out and they were forced to learn another way of living?

You are simply ignoring whole sections of our human history just to fit your pet theory.

BTW, I got my B.A. degree in ancient history, so I do know a little about this. This entire pet theory of yours just won't work. Now tell us, who is feeding all this to you?
 
Upvote 0

2Pillars

Active Member
Oct 3, 2004
168
5
71
✟435.00
Faith
Dear Readers,

Noah arrived some 10,000 + - years ago on this planet. Noah's grandsons built the first city on this planet as documented in the Book of Genesis. The first human civilization or villages are some 9,000 years old and are in Mesopotamia..

Evols continue to support Scripture since they always list cites younger than those of Mesopotamia. :D

It's so sad to see well educated TE's resort to their fallacious tactical argument when the could no longer hold their shaky faith. Such tactics would not derail me from exposing their ERRORS. :cry:

Now, are you all ready to admit TE's flawed doctrinal assumption?

2Pillars said:
The History of Human Civilization began in the Cradle of Civilization, in Mesopatamia. From there came math, writing, commerce, technology, etc. All of the things which we call Human Civilization, Today.
2Pillars said:
Dear grmorton,
Go to Mesopotamia [Article] - World Book Online Americas Edition or any other Encyclopedia, and you will find that the first Human Civilization, is found in Mesopatamia, EXACTLY as described in Scripture.

Failure to show an Earlier Human Civilization will be the test. Either show us another, according to History, or we must accept History, which shows that God knew exactly what He wrote.

When you accept the Historical evidence, you will go exactly opposite of the Religion of the Evolution of Human Intelligence. Science should quit fighting History, in it's attempt to establish it's False Religion.

We inherited our Human Intelligence from the descendants of Noah, who built the FIRST Human cities and Civilizations on this Planet.
I am still waiting ... waiting... waiting...:sleep:
 
Upvote 0

grmorton

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2004
1,241
83
75
Spring TX formerly Beijing, China
Visit site
✟24,283.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
2Pillars said:
Dear Readers,

Noah arrived some 10,000 + - years ago on this planet. Noah's grandsons built the first city on this planet as documented in the Book of Genesis. The first human civilization or villages are some 9,000 years old and are in Mesopotamia..
I suppose by this you mean Noah arrived here from some other planet.


[/quote]Evols continue to support Scripture since they always list cites younger than those of Mesopotamia. :D [/quote]
Hey fellow, Mesopotamia--3100 bc. Egypt 3250 BC, Pakistan 3300 BC, Malta 3500-4000 BC, China 6600 BC. Egype, Pakistaon, Malta and China are all older than the dates coming out of Mesopotamia. We are not listing sites (not cites) younger than Mesopotamia. What is wrong with you? Maybe you will get to be the very first person I put on an ignore list.

I am still waiting ... waiting... waiting...:sleep:
No, you aren't waiting, you aren't listening, or reading. Is this what you young-earthers call good defence of the faith?
 
Upvote 0

rmwilliamsll

avid reader
Mar 19, 2004
6,006
334
✟7,946.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Green
Noah's grandsons built the first city on this planet as documented in the Book of Genesis.

Gen 4:17 And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.
 
Upvote 0

Vance

Contributor
Jul 16, 2003
6,666
264
59
✟30,780.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
:o)

2Pillars, you have failed to respond to most of the arguments made in this thread.

Please answer the questions posed rather than ignore them and act as if we have not addressed your challenge.

You have set up a false dilemma. The date of the first civilization is entirely irrelevant to this issue. You have started with the false assumption that civilization is the first sign of human intelligence, and that no human intelligence was seen before 10,000 and the neolithic revolution. Until you can support that proposition, which you can't, then your follow up of when the first civilization occurred is irrelevant.

Now, you are just making the rest of the Creationists squirm in embarrassment over your presenting this proposition of Noah from "elsewhere" under the guise of Creationism.
 
Upvote 0

2Pillars

Active Member
Oct 3, 2004
168
5
71
✟435.00
Faith
rmwilliamsll said:
Noah's grandsons built the first city on this planet as documented in the Book of Genesis.
Dear rmwilliams,

You’re aboslutely WRONG.. Cain built the first city on the 1st Heaven (the world of Adam thru Noah)Genesis 1:6-8 -- just outside, east of the garden of Eden – which was, but later, completely destroyed by the universal flood when the windows of heaven were opened, Genesis 7:11.

2Peter 3:5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: (Greek-Destroyed, totally and completely)

2Peter 3:7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

Noah’s grandsons, like Cain, had no other Humans to marry. They married and produced children with the descendants of the sons of God, made on the 5th Day. They became mighty men and also built the first city or civilization on this planet.

Again, the point is, there was NO trace of human civilization nor any other signs of Human Intelligence anywhere else in this Whole Planet until Noah arrived 10,000 +-years ago.

If Mindless Nature could produce Human Intelligence, it would have done so MILLIONS of years BEFORE Noah arrived.


Not all Creationists are the same. <g>
 
Upvote 0

2Pillars

Active Member
Oct 3, 2004
168
5
71
✟435.00
Faith
Vance,

If you want me to answer your questions, then, next time, don't ask any question that is only based on your own distorted religious views and premises!

Surely, you have read enough of my postings on this forum to know exactly where I stand, right? I will give you a hint in case you're slow noticing-- OEC!

So, why are you affraid to deal with me, based on my posted official stand, leaving YEC's position out of our discussion.

Now, are you ready to admit your error on this thread so we could move on?

If Mindless Nature could produce Human Intelligence, it would have done so MILLIONS of years BEFORE Noah arrived.

Not all Creationists are the same. <g>

:sleep:
 
Upvote 0

Tenacious-D

Active Member
Jul 26, 2004
226
14
✟424.00
Faith
Anglican
2Pillars said:
Dear rmwilliams,

You’re aboslutely WRONG.. Cain built the first city on the 1st Heaven (the world of Adam thru Noah)Genesis 1:6-8 -- just outside, east of the garden of Eden – which was, but later, completely destroyed by the universal flood when the windows of heaven were opened, Genesis 7:11.

2Peter 3:5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: (Greek-Destroyed, totally and completely)

2Peter 3:7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

Noah’s grandsons, like Cain, had no other Humans to marry. They married and produced children with the descendants of the sons of God, made on the 5th Day. They became mighty men and also built the first city or civilization on this planet.

Again, the point is, there was NO trace of human civilization nor any other signs of Human Intelligence anywhere else in this Whole Planet until Noah arrived 10,000 +-years ago.

If Mindless Nature could produce Human Intelligence, it would have done so MILLIONS of years BEFORE Noah arrived.


Not all Creationists are the same. <g>

You are both wrong!
 
Upvote 0

2Pillars

Active Member
Oct 3, 2004
168
5
71
✟435.00
Faith
Dear Readers,

I'm waiting and have been for many, many, years.

So far NO Evol has been able to identify another Civilization older than that of Mesopotamia, just South of the mountains of Ararat.

God's Word stands against the false theories of Evols . There was NO Human Civilization until Noah arrived on this Planet, some 10,000 +- years ago.

If Mindless Nature could produce Human Civil Intelligence, it would have done so MILLIONS of years BEFORE Noah arrived.

Not all Creationists are the same.
:amen:
 
Upvote 0

Tenacious-D

Active Member
Jul 26, 2004
226
14
✟424.00
Faith
Anglican
2Pillars said:
Dear Readers,

I'm waiting and have been for many, many, years.

So far NO Evol has been able to identify another Civilization older than that of Mesopotamia, just South of the mountains of Ararat.

God's Word stands against the false theories of Evols . There was NO Human Civilization until Noah arrived on this Planet, some 10,000 +- years ago.

If Mindless Nature could produce Human Civil Intelligence, it would have done so MILLIONS of years BEFORE Noah arrived.

Not all Creationists are the same.
:amen:
Are you so blinded by your obvious vitriol against a biological theory. I have never heard a biologist yet complain (or even comment) about whether Mesopotamia is the oldest civilisation or not.

This has nothing to do with God's word versus evolution, which of course in reality are not opposed.
 
Upvote 0

2Pillars

Active Member
Oct 3, 2004
168
5
71
✟435.00
Faith
Tenacious-D said:
Are you so blinded by your obvious vitriol against a biological theory. I have never heard a biologist yet complain (or even comment) about whether Mesopotamia is the oldest civilisation or not.

This has nothing to do with God's word versus evolution, which of course in reality are not opposed.
Dear Tenacious-D,


Like most TE’s on this board, you cannot use Scripture to support your wild opinions. You can only use your religious interpretational methods of Genesis -- which don't agree with Scripture, Science nor History -- and based it only on your own religion's theories or assumptions which are flawed.

I double dare ALL the TE's to use the Scripture and try to prove their case! :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

Vance

Contributor
Jul 16, 2003
6,666
264
59
✟30,780.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
My question is very simple, and it applies exactly to your proposal. Why do you think there was no signs of human intelligence before the first "civilizations"? How can you say that all of these pre-historic, pre-civilization cultures were not full of human intelligence? They created homes, settlements with many homes, created art and traded with distant cultures. They had religious beliefs and developed very interesting tools out of stone, bone and antler, including projectile enhancing devises. No matter when you date these, they all existed in hunter/gatherer societies, and are all clear indications of human intelligence.

They also had our exact same bodies.

So, where is your evidence that all of these cultures and societies outside of "civilizations" were without human intelligence?
 
Upvote 0

2Pillars

Active Member
Oct 3, 2004
168
5
71
✟435.00
Faith
Vance said:
My question is very simple, and it applies exactly to your proposal. Why do you think there was no signs of human intelligence before the first "civilizations"? How can you say that all of these pre-historic, pre-civilization cultures were not full of human intelligence? They created homes, settlements with many homes, created art and traded with distant cultures. They had religious beliefs and developed very interesting tools out of stone, bone and antler, including projectile enhancing devises. No matter when you date these, they all existed in hunter/gatherer societies, and are all clear indications of human intelligence.

They also had our exact same bodies.

So, where is your evidence that all of these cultures and societies outside of "civilizations" were without human intelligence?
Vance,

Be SPECIFIC with your query which is very vague! I need you to provide us with dates (before or after the 1st civilization found in Mesapotamia) and names of culture that you are referring to (links), for validation (foundation) of discussion.

:sleep:
 
Upvote 0

herev

CL--you are missed!
Jun 8, 2004
13,619
935
60
✟43,600.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
2 pillars, is this thinking that Noah was not from this planet some of your own thinking or were you taught this from a particular denominational background. I curious as I have never heard it before--I mean NEVER. I would appreciate it if you would shed some light on your sources.
 
Upvote 0

herev

CL--you are missed!
Jun 8, 2004
13,619
935
60
✟43,600.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
2Pillars said:
I double dare ALL the TE's to use the Scripture and try to prove their case! :thumbsup:
should that scare us? after all the thousands of times it has been posted here that Scripture cannot be used to prove TE--and with the knowledge that evolutionary theory did not exist when the scriptures were written, this is not something that is possible, nor does it persuade us to change our opinion
 
Upvote 0

Tenacious-D

Active Member
Jul 26, 2004
226
14
✟424.00
Faith
Anglican
2Pillars said:
Dear Tenacious-D,


Like most TE’s on this board, you cannot use Scripture to support your wild opinions. You can only use your religious interpretational methods of Genesis -- which don't agree with Scripture, Science nor History -- and based it only on your own religion's theories or assumptions which are flawed.

I double dare ALL the TE's to use the Scripture and try to prove their case! :thumbsup:
I have very little time for someone who is so uneducated on this topic as to make outlandish inferences of a biological theory with regards to the history of human civilisation. You, quite simply, don't know what the heck you are blathering about.
 
Upvote 0

Vance

Contributor
Jul 16, 2003
6,666
264
59
✟30,780.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
2Pillars said:
Vance,

Be SPECIFIC with your query which is very vague! I need you to provide us with dates (before or after the 1st civilization found in Mesapotamia) and names of culture that you are referring to (links), for validation (foundation) of discussion.

:sleep:
I am speaking of EVERY culture that existed before the Mesapotamian cultures, if you like. All of the Cro-Magnon cultures, the Clovis cultures, and pre-Clovis in North America, Aurignacian, Solutrean, Magdalenian, and all of the other paleolithic, mesolithic and early neolithic cultures. These are all well-established and well-known cultures and societies living before 10,000 B.C.. We have their art, their tools, the evidence of their dwellings, and their burial sites. They were modern humans in every sense, and to say they did not have human intelligence is just ridiculous. The evidence for these cultures is massive and easily found in any library or even on the web. It is up to YOU to show that these cultures did not exist, were not intelligent or were not human.

And, as for evolution not being able to develop human intelligence, you have still failed to establish why this would be the case. Again, if you are going to assert that it can't, then you bear the burden of showing that it can't.

Regardless, if there WERE any problem with evolution producing human intelligence, it is easily resolved by the simple fact of GOD. At some point of the evolutionary process, "God breathed".
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.