God permits men to commit evil acts =/= God is not omnibenevolent.
That's a red herring, and you should know that as I've corrected you on that point before. The question is, are you being wilfully dishonest or not?
To clarify, my argument has nothing to do with god permitting evil acts (however an argument still could be made using the formatting in your reply).
My argument is god creating people that he knows will commit evil acts and spread evil is by definition enabling evil to gain a foothold in the world.
If you are enabling evil, then you are not omnibenevolent.
God's plan for humanity entails that evil is permitted for a duration. This does not equate to Him being immoral.
Yes it does.
For example, if I had the power to create complex life like on mars however I wanted to and could foresee how it will act for the rest of time,I would be faced with a choice. Two options I would have are as follows:
1) I could decide to create a world in which there will be widespread and repeated genocide, torture, rape, slavery, disease, murder, famine among other calamities
or,
2) I could create a world in which disease will never exist, food and water will be plentiful and it's inhabitants will want to peacefully coexist with each other in every regard.
Other choices would be possible on a spectrum between the two (i.e. a world which is better than what we have, but not perfectly good), or beyond the two (i.e. a world more evil than we currently have). However, for the purposes of the point, those two choices I listed are two choices that would be available to me.
If I, or any other human decided to create world #1 over world # 2 simply because it was the plan I had in mind, I would rightly be called an immoral monster. Any moral being would choose to create world #2.
And note, free will does not enter into this argument anywhere. He simply knows how the various world designs are going to turn out no matter what choices he makes in regards to their design. Anyone in every universe will have an equal amount of free will.
Your god chose world #1. I would label any human who made that choice as immoral, and as such, I shall label your god the same way.
What if in not healing him, some greater good would arise that would be the direct cause of others being prevented from suffering in the manner he suffered?
In that scenario, it would be immoral to make the many suffer just so I could alleviate my kid's pain.
And that's irrelevant because the benefit gained by your kids suffering could be granted to us in another way by an all powerful being that does not require suffering. In short, the only reason suffering would be required to gain certain knowledge is because god designed things to work that way.
If he's all powerful, then it doesn't have to be that way.
For example, he could give us all of the knowledge by say.... eating a fruit or something? It seemed to work for good and evil.
Because if you are good, then you have a desire to see evil acts never get committed. I am not all powerful, however I do what I can to prevent evil as best as I can because I am a good person.
If I was all powerful, and perfectly moral, then I would have a moral obligation to end evil right now.
How do you know God has no reason for allowing evil?
I don't, that's not my argument. I'd say if your god actually does exist, then he obviously has a reason for evil to exist, because evil does exist. However, your god is either not moral or omnibenevolent or all powerful. He could have one or two of the characteristics, but not all three.
Seems you would have to be omniscient to be able to truthfully know that.
Nonsense. Omniscience is not required to point out basic contradictions like I have above.
No, I don't believe god exists. Therefore, I do not believe I am god. That's a rather silly question to ask an atheist.