Oh no...you're wrong again!
When I refer to the truth, I'm talking about something that can be proven, or demonstrated. Basically, it's the opposite of what you mean by "truth".
Here is a bit of truth for you.......
“Scientism is not the same thing as science. Science is a blessing, but scientism is a curse. Science, I mean what practicing scientists actually do, is acutely and admirably aware of its limits, and humbly admits to the provisional character of its conclusions; but scientism is dogmatic, and peddles certainties. It is always at the ready with the solution to every problem, because it believes that the solution to every problem is a scientific one, and so it gives scientific answers to non-scientific questions. Owing to its preference for totalistic explanation, scientism transforms science into an ideology, which is of course a betrayal of the experimental and empirical spirit.”
Leon Wieseltier, Perhaps Culture is Now the Counterculture: A Defense of the Humanities, 19 May 2013;
www.newrepublic.com/article/113299/leon-wieseltier-commencement-speech-brandeis-university-2013 [Wieseltier self-describes as a humanist.]
See what you make of that mrs truth teller.
And here is another bit of truth............
As many as receive him to them he gives the right to be sons of God, even to those who believe in his name
And here is a bit more truth for you.....
God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son so that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have everlasting life.
I have a feeling your response is going to prove the truth of the first comment and thus making your response to 2 and 3 irrelevant.