- Dec 17, 2010
- 9,687
- 2,425
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Married
Yep - cause that's exactly how the empirical method works and what built the modern world!I think for myself

Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yep - cause that's exactly how the empirical method works and what built the modern world!I think for myself
Yep - cause that's exactly how the empirical method works and what built the modern world!
Yet based it on known physics and found a weak spot. You claiming you can do that? Write the paper and the truth will out! You don't want anything to do with peer-reviewed science? Then you're hiding behind 'personal opinion' and just don't want to know anything new.Einstein thought for himself
You don't want anything to do with peer-reviewed science?
So why are you in this forum? If you're here just to sneer - isn't that trolling?
So why are you in this forum?
To communicate your subjective gut felt opinion rather than even attempt to put in a science headline? Lucky us.To communicate
To communicate your subjective gut felt opinion
It's actually a lot better than it was, due to actually making changes about the use of Chloro Flurocarbons.Thousands of holes
That let the Sun burn the water
No - just a request for a polite discussion about the science on rational grounds - not someone's groundless fancies. Or else I'll continue to talk about my dream about how unicorn vomit fuelled an F35 over the White House, doing an after burner that painted it rainbow colours. It was so pretty.As well as negativity
No - just a request for a polite discussion about the science
I think for myself
Judges 17:6 In those days there was no king in Israel, but every man did that which was right in his own eyes.
Yep - cause that's exactly how the empirical method works and what built the modern world!![]()
Does not apply
The empirical method is flawed by sinful men.
It has many "weakest links."
I know you guys are tired of this example, but it's a good one:
Thalidomide was subjected to the empirical method and [prematurely] passed with flying colors.
And when Frances Kelsey wanted more of the empirical method applied, they said "nothing doing."
The rest is history.
Some circumvent the empirical method and foist their product on the public.
Such is the case with the Titanic, which passed all empirical methods, except for lifeboats-to-passenger ratios.
Adherence to the empirical method should have grounded the Challenger, but it was overridden by management.
The empirical method is only as effective as sinful men can allow it to be.
As per usual, your actual complaints are with management.
Ownership? Senior management?Who gives management the green light?
Ownership? Senior management?
Would ownership/senior management release a product/invention ahead of time if R&D said it wasn't ready?