Patrick Moore, Co-founder of GreenPeace states recently in The Australian:
The "Catastrophic" push behind manmade earth warming is propaganda based.
Otherwise, where did "the Science is Settled", and "the debate is over" come from?
Why is there obvious propaganda and over promotion, even how ALL CO2 effects are BAD.
Dupsters abound and Clingsters defend.
.
"I am sceptical that humans are the main cause of climate change, and that it will be catastrophic in the near future. There is no scientific proof of this hypothesis, yet we are told the debate is over, the science is settled.
My scepticism begins with the warmists certainty they can predict the global climate with a computer model. The entire basis for the doomsday climate change scenario is the hypothesis that increased CO2 due to fossil fuel emissions will heat the Earth to unliveable temperatures."
The "Catastrophic" push behind manmade earth warming is propaganda based.
Otherwise, where did "the Science is Settled", and "the debate is over" come from?
Why is there obvious propaganda and over promotion, even how ALL CO2 effects are BAD.
Dupsters abound and Clingsters defend.
.
Upvote
0