Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Since it's not established that A => B, your logic is unsound: it is not established that the reason the Bible has not 'passed away' is because it's 'Gods word' - it's entirely possible, for instance, that if it's just an old piece of test, it's persisted by sheer chance. After all, there must be a most popular religion, and it would have a scared text - who's to say that Christianity didn't just get lucky?
Well, so then you are saying you believe in survival or the luckiest?? Hmm?
Often enough that is all it is.
Including the luck to born, say, in the USA, not Chad; or the luck to be born with intelligence or beauty. (some of us got both)
So it is no longer survival of the fittest?
What made you think it ever was?
And if you know the answer to your own Q please tell me.
Of course it's not. Why would you think that?Is that all your life hangs on WC someone else admitting defeat to you. Empty, empty, empty!
I'm saying that's a valid possibility. Because it's at least possible that the Bible is the most popular religious text out of sheer luck*, his argument that this proves God exists, is fallacious. The sheer fact that the Bible is popular doesn't prove God exists, nor that he is the reason it's popular.Well, so then you are saying you believe in survival or the luckiest?? Hmm?
So... you're saying clarity and accuracy in science, scientific literature, and 'layman' explanations of scientific facts and theories... you're saying all that is a bad thing?Well, we both know you think you know the answer to your own question, Hespera.
At one time Darwin USED that term "survival of the fitest" regarding natural selection but later it was rejected when it didn't fit exactly true to form.
Once again science has their own "adaptations" of the English language to "fix" the errors of the past. That's the only way they can get people to accept what they promote. Lots of little bandaids that they hope no one looks at... and for the most part most don't. They just bow down to the gods of science and say ... yes, of course, we can see it (especially when you give us such meaningful pictures with your explanations), praise be to the gods of science... the Darwinians Ha Ha Ha. I am so funny it amazes me.![]()
Well, we both know you think you know the answer to your own question, Hespera.
At one time Darwin USED that term "survival of the fitest" regarding natural selection but later it was rejected when it didn't fit exactly true to form.
Once again science has their own "adaptations" of the English language to "fix" the errors of the past. That's the only way they can get people to accept what they promote. Lots of little bandaids that they hope no one looks at... and for the most part most don't. They just bow down to the gods of science and say ... yes, of course, we can see it (especially when you give us such meaningful pictures with your explanations), praise be to the gods of science... the Darwinians Ha Ha Ha. I am so funny it amazes me.![]()
Well, we both know you think you know the answer to your own question, Hespera.
That's the only way they can get people to accept what they promote.
Lots of little bandaids that they hope no one looks at... and for the most part most don't.
They just bow down to the gods of science and say .
the Darwinians
as a wet noodle with which to lash about.haha its so funny it amazes me".
That is very unlikely given your demonstrated lack of knowledge of science.
Once again science has their own "adaptations" of the English language to "fix" the errors of the pas
Lets see. There is no 'adaptation" of the English language to fix errors, except in your imagination. Meaningless criticism.
What a completely weird thing to say. Nothing in science is anything but silly word games, to you?
Like I said about MK, a criticism or attempt to belittle has no sting if it is completely off. What a strange version of life you have!
There is no bowing, and no gods. So again, meaningless.
a non existent group, other than the residents of Darwin Australia.
I have many times observed that those who choose to reject ecolution, always for preconceived religious reasons, have lo and many a strawman to savage. "Darwinian / gods" for example.
Of course, not a solitary one of them has ever, can ever come up with a single actual fact that would contradict evolution.
IF it were false, that should be a cinch, not that it would a craationist who came up with the data.
Since the theory is impregnable to any facts ever detected, it leaves
saying "
as a wet noodle with which to lash about.
What would be your falsifiable theory as to why nobody has ever been able to uncover any contrary data?
So... you're saying clarity and accuracy in science, scientific literature, and 'layman' explanations of scientific facts and theories... you're saying all that is a bad thing?
What inaccuracy and lies in science are you talking about? Why would inaccuracy in science negate inaccuracy and falsehoods in Christianity and the Bible?What I'm saying is fix the inaccuracy and lies of what is out there and stop preaching to me about how inaccurate and false the Bible and God and Christianity. I can only see hypocrisy.
Hespera, you really need to get a life (preferably eternal life) but you really do need to join humanity. You seem to be about the most unhappy person I know. You can't seem to cope with the fact that MOST of the world does not live in your little world of science. You guys make it much bigger than it is. No body really cares about Darwinian/Darwinism etc. You guys are the only ones who care about "ecolution". You alone are the only ones who are impressed by the sounds of your own voices. That's why you come on here to hear yourselves boast and talk but most of what you say makes no sense!?! It's foolishness. It's meaningless. You have no part in even your science world. No one really cares about you but God and probably your mother. These guys on here don't care about you. Richard Dawkins doesn't care about you. Budhha doesn't care about you. God cares about you. And He's the One you push away!! Very sad!!! Very sad!!!
What I'm saying is fix the inaccuracy and lies of what is out there and stop preaching to me about how inaccurate and false the Bible and God and Christianity. I can only see hypocrisy.
Speak for yourself. Most people in my country know the value of science - it's the bedrock of modern civilisation. If you don't care for science, I suggest you leave the Internet. After all, the former built the latter.Hespera, you really need to get a life (preferably eternal life) but you really do need to join humanity. You seem to be about the most unhappy person I know. You can't seem to cope with the fact that MOST of the world does not live in your little world of science.
Except for, y'know, the kids who're trying to get a good science education. And the people whose lives are saved because of our superior understanding of biology. And the infrastructure built using adaptations of evolutionary theory. And the entire scientific community, with added emphasis on the entire field of biology and biological research.You guys make it much bigger than it is. No body really cares about Darwinian/Darwinism etc. You guys are the only ones who care about "ecolution".
You are a visciously cruel person, Inan3. Is there any need to talk to a fellow human like that? Is that really how you think you'll win someone over to Christ? What a pathetic example you are.You alone are the only ones who are impressed by the sounds of your own voices. That's why you come on here to hear yourselves boast and talk but most of what you say makes no sense!?! It's foolishness. It's meaningless. You have no part in even your science world. No one really cares about you but God and probably your mother. These guys on here don't care about you. Richard Dawkins doesn't care about you. Budhha doesn't care about you. God cares about you. And He's the One you push away!! Very sad!!! Very sad!!!
Of course it's not. Why would you think that?
Getting my Russian A-Level, now that's important to me. As is passing my CBT and getting an awesome Suzuki GSX1300. As is going to see Hairspray live on Saturday. As is celebrating Easter with my friends, family, and partner - with the added bonus that I get to indulge in all the food I've given up for lent.
So no, Inan3, my life is not 'empty, empty, empty'.
OMGoodness!! You really are a person!!! Who would have thought...?
I'm saying that's a valid possibility. Because it's at least possible that the Bible is the most popular religious text out of sheer luck*, his argument that this proves God exists, is fallacious. The sheer fact that the Bible is popular doesn't prove God exists, nor that he is the reason it's popular.
*After all, even if there are no gods, there's still going to be religious texts, and one of them is going to have the most followers.
Allegedly. All I see is a religious text, no more inspiring or hope-bringing than the Qu'ran or the Vedic texts. Care to provide evidence that it's anything more than that?None like the Bible though!! The Bible isn't popular because people like the wording. The Bible is popular because it brings them to God on so many levels. It is God's message to man and when men believe and follow it they can actually come into the presence of the supreme Diety. It changes peoples lives. That's evidence WC. Lives changed, healed, set free, etc. All because of the Bible. Don't you suppose with all the rhetoric online and books written against it that if it was as you say it is that it would have fallen by the wayside already. No, men and women have given their lives for this book and GOD has preserved it and it is not popular by luck or chance. NO OTHER book has gone through the scrutiny or praise that the Bible has. No, WC, this is God's word to mankind, written down and preserved and all you have to do is believe it and obey. It's a book of light and truth but it tells us, "Men loved darkness better than Light, BECAUSE their deeds were evil." That's the reason it is rejected. People don't want to obey it. They think it will put them in bondage but in actuality it will make them free.
Speak for yourself. Most people in my country know the value of science - it's the bedrock of modern civilisation. If you don't care for science, I suggest you leave the Internet. After all, the former built the latter.
Except for, y'know, the kids who're trying to get a good science education. And the people whose lives are saved because of our superior understanding of biology. And the infrastructure built using adaptations of evolutionary theory. And the entire scientific community, with added emphasis on the entire field of biology and biological research.
Yep, no one cares...
You are a visciously cruel person, Inan3. Is there any need to talk to a fellow human like that? Is that really how you think you'll win someone over to Christ? What a pathetic example you are.
Hespera can look after herself, but still... there's no need to be a complete [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse].
Speak for yourself. Most people in my country know the value of science - it's the bedrock of modern civilisation. If you don't care for science, I suggest you leave the Internet. After all, the former built the latter.
Except for, y'know, the kids who're trying to get a good science education. And the people whose lives are saved because of our superior understanding of biology. And the infrastructure built using adaptations of evolutionary theory. And the entire scientific community, with added emphasis on the entire field of biology and biological research
Yep, no one cares....
You are a visciously cruel person, Inan3. Is there any need to talk to a fellow human like that? Is that really how you think you'll win someone over to Christ? What a pathetic example you are.
Hespera can look after herself, but still... there's no need to be a complete [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse].