Well, all I can say Molal, is what do you put first in your life. If the Lord is first in your life you should be looking to Him for peace in this matter certainly not atheistic scientists. If you have made Christ the Lord your life look unto Him. If you haven't, then you are not really a christian. A Christian will put Him first. You can't have one foot in faith and the other in unbelief. You can't serve two masters. Choose you this day whom you will serve.
You seem to paint a picture of an easy choice. It isn't easy for everyone. Again, you seem to be looking at things from your own lens.
There is a wedge between evolution and the church when they say that the scriptures are not literal.
This isn't wholly accurate. The wedge of which you speak is only a problem for the small portion of Literalists in the Christian community.
My wife was raised a Catholic and she was raised with no problem in this area. I used to be a Christian and I had no problem in this area with evolution.
Evolution is not a wedge of any sort unless you MAKE it one.
It isn't a problem for most Christians.
When they say that God lied.
No Christians who are ok with evolution say "God Lied". That is a misrepresentation of the debate.
Atheists like myself don't care what God said or did or didn't do. But the majority of Christians who believe in evolution see no "lie" nor do they think God lied.
You need to decide which side you are on. No ones against you. You just need to figure out where you stand on the scriptures. The scriptures say that all things were made by Him and without Him nothing was made.
This would seem to paint him into a corner. It is the tiny Creationist flock that wants this strict dividing line. You wish to drive a wedge where none need exist.
Like I said, in terms of religion it matters not to me at all. But I know plenty of Christians who see no problem whatsoever with evolution. To paint this stark dividing line is to force some people further away from your God.
If that is your ministry then so be it.
I don't think it serves anyone any good to make false dichotomies or paint exclusions where none need exist.
Look, I'm not a believer anymore so I don't see a need for religion in my life. But I see that many people do want religion. They want faith, just as I did at one time. They want a life that derives some different meaning beyond the physical. I could be completely mistaken in being an atheist. But that's my choice, my cross to bear.
To that end I hope Molal keeps seeking and he finds what helps him most. But it serves no one's ends to put stumbling blocks in anyones' way. And a wedge in defining faith would seem to be a terrible stumbling block.