AngelAmidala
Legend
- Feb 1, 2002
- 30,243
- 642
- 48
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Methodist
- Marital Status
- Single
I'll bite and ask for some clarification....
I think like Snoochface said, people are going to focus in on the first part of what was said in regards to the principles. People are going to see it say that they're "non-negotiable" but then in the same paragraph it also says "they are not meant to be enforced." While Erwin continues and says that each forum (or I guess forum group) may expand on those principles...and of course that those principles can't be contradicted....I wish there was an easier way to explain all that without giving the impression that the principles aren't meant to be enforced.
I had to read it a couple times before I got the whole point....that the principles are a bit like the guiding factors for the forum areas to create their rules.
If there was a way to avoid the whole "enforcement" part...I think that might clear things up.
Just my personal opinion though.
As is this.
The first new logo I saw was the one where the letters forums was across a cross (in the center of the letters) and where each letter of forums stood for something (faith, regional, etc.). It was a hard logo for me to read....I think because the cross and the letters forums were large (as well as christian-based, internet family under the logo) but the words (faith, regional, etc.) were much smaller. It's an interesting logo concept....just was hard for me to focus on....unlike the globe one. It's not something I'm going to go bonkers over. Just a personal observation.
It's confusing that you say these are not rules to be enforced, but that enforceable rules should come from those principles. It should be both, especially while the rules are in a state of flux, so things don't get out of hand in the meantime.
Erwin's post said:The above are non-negotiable principles that forum rules that are developed have to be consistent with. The above are not meant to be rules that are to be enforced - the specifics of how the above principles are to be enforced will form the forum rules.
Forum rules may expand from the above principles and add things not covered by the above principles but the above principles cannot be contradicted.
I think like Snoochface said, people are going to focus in on the first part of what was said in regards to the principles. People are going to see it say that they're "non-negotiable" but then in the same paragraph it also says "they are not meant to be enforced." While Erwin continues and says that each forum (or I guess forum group) may expand on those principles...and of course that those principles can't be contradicted....I wish there was an easier way to explain all that without giving the impression that the principles aren't meant to be enforced.
I had to read it a couple times before I got the whole point....that the principles are a bit like the guiding factors for the forum areas to create their rules.
If there was a way to avoid the whole "enforcement" part...I think that might clear things up.
Just my personal opinion though.
As is this.
Upvote
0