• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The fatal flaw of Universalism

Charlie24

Newbie
Oct 17, 2014
2,306
963
✟111,231.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
No it was the version for sure. I'm not perfect. The KJV translators were not perfect. The KJV is not perfect. How do I know that? I have examined enough verses in interlinear form to know.

Charlie, ever notice that the KJV supporters always favorably compare the KJV to other versions such as the NIV, ESV and on and on, but NEVER compare it with the original Greek and Hebrew?

You will believe the KJV is the original inspired English version of Gods Word or you will not.

If you believe it is, no other version will be acceptable.

If you don't, you will search and search through versions never able to come to the knowledge of truth.

And when the versions become confusing, you will search for truth through mans philosophy.
 
Upvote 0

Charlie24

Newbie
Oct 17, 2014
2,306
963
✟111,231.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
I'm done with man's philosophy, so your scenario fails. If "the versions become confusing" we have the reliable Greek and Hebrew texts to consult.

I would be very careful with the Greek. It can get you into trouble quick if you don't have the proper knowledge of it.

I will admit that I don't possess that. I use it as reference not to determine doctrine.
 
Upvote 0

Lazarus Short

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2016
2,934
3,009
75
Independence, Missouri, USA
✟301,642.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I would be very careful with the Greek. It can get you into trouble quick if you don't have the proper knowledge of it.

I will admit that I don't possess that. I use it as reference not to determine doctrine.

Sorry, Charlie, but there is a problem with that approach. Theologians, then and now, must toe the line if they are to keep their job/positions/standing. So, taught the denominational line in seminary, and then promulgating it to the masses may or may not involve that thing-that-is-so-hard-to-find: Truth.

Have you determined doctrine for youself...or just picked up what you were offered?

I used interlinear texts just enough to see bias in the choices of key words. It was enough.
 
Upvote 0

Charlie24

Newbie
Oct 17, 2014
2,306
963
✟111,231.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Sorry, Charlie, but there is a problem with that approach. Theologians, then and now, must toe the line if they are to keep their job/positions/standing. So, taught the denominational line in seminary, and then promulgating it to the masses may or may not involve that thing-that-is-so-hard-to-find: Truth.

Have you determined doctrine for youself...or just picked up what you were offered?

I used interlinear texts just enough to see bias in the choices of key words. It was enough.
Ok, I mentioned that because sometimes a Greek word in question can have it's definition defined by a derivative and when proper use of adjectives and nouns are not applied, you end up with a misunderstanding.

Words like "eternal" and "everlasting."
 
Upvote 0

Lazarus Short

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2016
2,934
3,009
75
Independence, Missouri, USA
✟301,642.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Ok, I mentioned that because sometimes a Greek word in question can have it's definition defined by a derivative and when proper use of adjectives and nouns are not applied, you end up with a misunderstanding.

Words like "eternal" and "everlasting."

OK, but I don't see any resolution between the camps of understanding/misunderstanding. As usual, it's doctrine first and the words a distant second.

OTOH, God says to study the Bible yourself, to show yourself approved as a workman who rightly divides the Word of God. Paraphrased, but I think I got the gist of it.
 
Upvote 0

Charlie24

Newbie
Oct 17, 2014
2,306
963
✟111,231.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
OK, but I don't see any resolution between the camps of understanding/misunderstanding. As usual, it's doctrine first and the words a distant second.

OTOH, God says to study the Bible yourself, to show yourself approved as a workman who rightly divides the Word of God. Paraphrased, but I think I got the gist of it.

Your mentioning resolution reminds me of a professor who approached me one day in my senior year.

He asked me if believed what I was being taught. I told him, yes sir, I do. He said, but do you really believe it? I asked what he meant. Then he asked a question that has stuck with me the rest of my life.

Has God confirmed it in your heart, have you submitted yourself to Him for the absolute truth?

He then quoted Proverbs 3:6
In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.

I am still asking Him to guide my paths, but I know for that to happen I must keep myself submitted to Him. I often check up on that to confirm it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lazarus Short
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Why not go to the horse? Clement of Alexandria, Church father, had this to say:
“For there are partial corrections (padeiai) which are called chastisements (kolasis), which many of us who have been in transgression incur by falling away from the Lord’s people. But as children are chastised by their teacher, or their father, so are we by Providence. But God does not punish (timoria) for punishment (timoria) is retaliation for evil. He chastises, however, for good to those who are chastised collectively and individually.” (Strom, VII, ii; Pedag. I, 8; on I John ii, 2)
Do you read Greek? I do, who provided the translation of all your quotes? If you had extended me the simple courtesy of actually reading my post you might find that BDAG cited at least 50 historical sources in their definitions. This is one person which certainly does not trump everything else.
Aristotle used it as correction when he plainly and clearly stated,
“Kolasis aims at correction.” (Rhetric. i. 10.)
He also says later in the same work,
“There is a difference between revenge (timoria) and punishment (kolasis);
the latter (kolasis) is inflicted in the interest of the sufferer, the former in the interest of him who inflicts it, that he may obtain satisfaction.” (Rhetoric 1369b,13,)
Plato likewise:
“For the natural or accidental evils of others no one gets angry, or admonishes, or teaches, or punishes (kolazei) them, but we pity those afflicted with such misfortune for if, O Socrates, if you will consider what is the design of punishing (kolazein) the wicked, this of itself will show you that men think virtue something that may be acquired; for no one punishes (kolazei) the wicked, looking to the past only simply for the wrong he has done–that is, no one does this thing who does not act like a wild beast; desiring only revenge (timoria), without thought. Hence, he who seeks to punish (kolazein) with reason does not punish for the sake of the past wrong deed, but for the sake of the future, that neither the man himself who is punished may do wrong again, nor any other who has seen him chastised. And he who entertains this thought must believe that virtue may be taught, and he punishes (kolazei) for the purpose of deterring from wickedness.” (Protagoras 323 E)
Who were those scholars you were quoting again Der Alter?
Please note even in your cherry picked sources kolasis is punishment NOT correction. It will take more than 2-3 quotes to refute BDAG or other ECF. Sometimes, not always, kolasis does prevent future wrong deeds,. A person who has been punished is often reluctant to commit the same acts they were punished for. But Ben Franklin once said "a man who is convinced against his will is of the same opinion still." There often is no correction in kolasis.
To refute my sources requires a scholar in a relevant field showing from historical evidence that the conclusions of BDAG are wrong and you will never have that.
 
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,397
82
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟551,042.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Your continued evasiveness scores you ZERO points. I've asked you repeatedly just what then does Matt 25:46 refer to? Inquiring minds want to know and are still waiting.


Explain to me how tormented for ever and ever squares with God's purpose in Col 1:20 to reconcile all to himself. Explain to me how the "kings of the earth" referenced several times in Revelation and without exception, always described as God's sworn enemies are allowed to enter the gates of the New Jerusalem in Rev 21:24.


Can't help but laugh out loud at your comment considering you always post your favorite list of verses which you think supports your view. A list of "cherry picked" verses of your own!


v.7 Of course the converse is true but the verse does not preclude the fact that ALL shall eventually become victorious in keeping with Col 1:20 which is the whole point of Universalism isn't it?
v.8 Of course those people are thrown into the LOF. What do you suppose they are doing there? Twiddling their thumbs in misery? That could be. However a better indicator is found in Rev 22:
14Blessed are those washing their robes,a that their right will be to the tree of life, and they shall enter into the city by the gates. 15Outside are the dogs, and the sorcerers, and the sexually immoral, and the murderers, and the idolaters, and everyone loving and practicing falsehood.

The New Jerusalem has already come down to earth per Rev 21 which you cited and God is among His people which you already noted in v.3. In Rev 22 John further describes the city including the lake of fire outside. Note in v.14 note that πλύνοντες is a present tense participle better translated as "washing." Since the saints are already in the city and God is among His people as you have already acknowledged, WHO IS WASHING THEIR ROBES? Aren't the saints in the city already supposed to have their robes washed and clean?? Since the saints are already in the city and God is among His people as you have already acknowledged, who WILL HAVE THE RIGHT TO THE TREE OF LIFE and SHALL ENTER INTO THE CITY BY THE GATES?? The saints are already in the city so who else is allowed to enter? The only possible answer is THOSE OUTSIDE THE CITY in the lake of fire v.15.


Total rubbish as you diminish the power and sovereignty of God. What God wills, He will indeed accomplish. His hand is not too short to do whatever He wills but it's your prerogative to deny it. I prefer to take God at his word that ALL be saved.


Oh brother; you repeat your same argument again. Perhaps your memory is fading? Do you not remember that I wrote to you in another thread that "eternal life" refers to life in the Millennial Age which is why in speaking to the rich young ruler who was a Jew, Jesus equated 'eternal life' with the kingdom of heaven, the kingdom of God. Jesus himself defined 'eternal life' for us and he did not mean 'forever.' I informed you that the Jews were looking forward to an AGE OF TIME; i.e., MILLENNIUM where Jesus would conquer all her enemies and Israel would live in God's kingdom on earth in an era of peace. My explanation didn't sit well with you as you denied that the Jews were looking forward to the coming Millennial Age with Jesus as their conquering King instead of the Lamb slain on the cross - despite my quoting from the Jewish Encyclopedia. It's your choice to continue denying the fact that aionion refers to an age of time - not eternal. I prefer Jesus' own definition.

Dear Oldman: Enquiring minds will wait and wait and wait to no avail. LOL.

Kolasis aionion -Matthew 25:46-

Greek scholar William Barclay wrote concerning kolasis aionion (age-during corrective chastisement) in Matthew 25:46

“The Greek word for punishment is kolasis, which was not originally an ethical word at all. It originally meant the pruning of trees to make them grow better. There is no instance in Greek secular literature where kolasis does not mean remedial punishment. It is a simple fact that in Greek kolasis always means remedial punishment. God’s punishment is always for man’s cure.”

Fifteen literally translated (not interpretively translated) Bibles that reveal what God will do with the sinners in Matthew 25:46

Concordant Literal, Young’s literal, Wilson’s Emphatic Diaglott, Rotherham’s Emphasized, Scarlett’s, J.W. Hanson’s New Covenant, Twentieth Century, Ferrar Fenton, The Western New Testament, Weymouth’s (unedited), Clementson’s, The New Testament of our Lord and Savior Jesus Anointed, The Restoration of Original Sacred Name Bible, Bullinger’s Companion Bible margins, Jonathan Mitchell’s translation (2010).

Concerning the duration of kolasis (literally - corrective punishment), Matt. 25:46 says (KJV),

“And these shall go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into life eternal.”

Scarlett’s New Testament written in 1792 has “aeonian punishment” in place to “everlasting punishment.”

“And these will go away into aeonian punishment: but the righteous into aeonian life.”

The New Covenant by Dr. J.W. Hanson written in 1884 renders Matt. 25:46:

“And these shall go away into aeonian chastisement, and the just into aeonian life.”

Young’s Literal Translation first published in 1898 and reprinted many times since uses the following words:

“And these shall go away to punishment age-during, but the righteous to life age-during.”

Professor Young also compiled Young’s Concordance, where one can check the translation of each Hebrew or Greek word as translated in the KJV.

The Twentieth Century New Testament first printed in the year 1900 has:

“And these last will go away ‘into aeonian punishment,’ but the righteous ‘into aeonian life.’”

The Holy Bible in Modern English by Ferrar Fenton first published in 1903 gives the rendering:

"And these He will dismiss into a long correction, but the well-doers to an enduring life.

The New Testament in Modern Speech, by Dr. Weymouth, says:

“And these shall go away into punishment of the ages, but the righteous into life of the ages.”

Dr. Weymouth most frequently adopts such terms as “life of the ages,” “fire of the ages;” and in Rev. 14:6, “The good news of the ages.”

It is a matter to regret that the editors of the most recent edition of Dr. Weymouth’s version have reverted to the KJV renderings for the passages containing the Greek word aion, eon, or age.

The Western New Testament published in 1926 renders Matt. 25:46 as follows:

“And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into life eternal.”

The translation, however, has a footnote on Matthew 21:19 on the word “forever” which is the same word for “eternal” which says: "Literally, for the age.”

Clementson’s The New Testament (1938) shows,

“And these shall go away into eonian correction, but the righteous into eonian life.”

Wilson’s Emphatic Diaglott (1942 edition) translates the verse,

“And these shall go forth to the aionian cutting-off; but the righteous to aionian life.”

It should be noted that the “cutting-off” refers to pruning a fruit tree to make it bear more fruit.

The idea behind the word is not destructive but productive! Had Jesus wanted to emphasize a destructive end, He would have used the word “timoria.”

The Concordant Version (1930):

“And these shall be coming away into chastening eonian, yet the just into life eonian.”

The New Testament of our Lord and Savior Jesus Anointed printed in 1958 says:

“And these shall go away into agelasting cutting-off and the just into agelasting life.”

Joseph B. Rotherham, in his Emphasized Bible (1959), translates this verse,

“and these shall go away into age-abiding correction, but the righteous into age-abiding life.”

The Restoration of Original Sacred Name Bible copyrighted in 1976

has “age-abiding correction” instead of “everlasting punishment.”

Jonathan Mitchell’s N.T.Translation

"And so, these folks will be going off into an eonian pruning (a lopping-off which lasts for an undetermined length of time; an age-lasting correction; a pruning which has its source and character in the Age), yet the fair and just folks who are in right relationship and are in accord with the Way pointed out [go off] into eonian life (life which has it source and character in the Age; life pertaining to the Age)”.

Even some King James Study Bibles will show the reader in the margins or appendixes that the King’s translators were incorrect in their rendering of "eternal punishment.”

The great Companion Bible by Dr. Bullinger is an example of that.

Greek scholar William Barclay wrote concerning kolasis aionion (age-during corrective chastisement) in Matthew 25:46

“The Greek word for punishment is kolasis, which was not originally an ethical word at all. It originally meant the pruning of trees to make them grow better. There is no instance in Greek secular literature where kolasis does not mean remedial punishment. It is a simple fact that in Greek kolasis always means remedial punishment. God’s punishment is always for man’s cure.”
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,397
82
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟551,042.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Is God a Failure?

Now that’s a pretty poignant question. Or is it an insinuation? An inference? Or implication? Or is it truth, as many would have you believe? Have you ever heard a sermon by that title? I doubt if you have. But I’m certain you have heard many a sermon which has been riddled with such implications.

Allow me to rephrase the question: Have you ever heard a sermon stating that if you don’t accept Jesus, you’ll burn forever in hell? Ah, I knew I’d touch a raw nerve. You have, haven’t you? If you heard that God is going to lose so much as one individual to the devil forever, then God is a failure.

If you have heard that the heathen (who have never had an opportunity to hear of Jesus) will be tormented forever for not believing in Him, then you’ve heard that God is a failure. If you’ve heard that man’s puny will can withstand the omnipotent will of God, and that man’s will can paralyze God’s will, then you have heard that God is a failure.

If you’ve heard that the Adversary outsmarted God in the garden of Eden, if you’ve heard that God did not want Adam and Eve to eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, then you’ve heard that God is a failure.

If you’ve ever heard anyone affirm that God will lose 95% of His created beings that He’s placed on planet earth, and will torment them forever, then you’ve clearly heard that God is a failure.

If the Good Shepherd is not willing that any should perish, and yet gets weary and gives up before He finds the last sheep that’s lost, then you know that God is a failure.

If no one can come to Jesus except the Father draws him, and if the Father - eventually - does not draw every single person, then God is a failure.

What is the response of your heart to the poised question: Is God a failure? Ah, my heart says, “Nay, a billion nays.” My heart has fallen in love with a God who does all things perfectly, and one day all will be made plain, and in the end He will become ‘All in All’ and for that day my heart does wait and meanwhile I rejoice and endure because I see Him, the invisible One.

By faith I see a Master Plan for the ages and beyond, and I know I am part of that plan, and for this I whisper, “Thank you, Jesus.” I sing a song to my Beloved, Hallelujah!

In Love with Him

- Eleanor Garrod-
 
Upvote 0

Shrewd Manager

Through him, in all things, more than conquerors.
Site Supporter
Aug 16, 2019
4,167
4,081
Melbourne
✟364,409.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Do you read Greek? I do, who provided the translation of all your quotes? If you had extended me the simple courtesy of actually reading my post you might find that BDAG cited at least 50 historical sources in their definitions. This is one person which certainly does not trump everything else.

Please note even in your cherry picked sources kolasis is punishment NOT correction. It will take more than 2-3 quotes to refute BDAG or other ECF. Sometimes, not always, kolasis does prevent future wrong deeds,. A person who has been punished is often reluctant to commit the same acts they were punished for. But Ben Franklin once said "a man who is convinced against his will is of the same opinion still." There often is no correction in kolasis.
To refute my sources requires a scholar in a relevant field showing from historical evidence that the conclusions of BDAG are wrong and you will never have that.

So timoria is redundant then?

I don't read Greek but used to speak just enough of it to get me into trouble.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Your continued evasiveness scores you ZERO points. I've asked you repeatedly just what then does Matt 25:46 refer to? Inquiring minds want to know and are still waiting.
I have answered this question multiple times. Matt 25:46 says eternal life and eternal punishment. The duration of the punishment is equal to the duration of the life. Jesus is quoted as using the word death seventeen times in the gospels. In Matt 25 if Jesus had wanted to mean death in vs. 46 He would have used the word for death, not punishment.
Explain to me how tormented for ever and ever squares with God's purpose in Col 1:20 to reconcile all to himself. Explain to me how the "kings of the earth" referenced several times in Revelationelation and without exception, always described as God's sworn enemies are allowed to enter the gates of the New Jerusalem in Revelation 21:24.
Since you will not address my posts why should I waste time responding to yours?
Read Jeremiah 3:9-13 God’s will clearly stated was that the whole house of Israel and the whole house of Judah to cling to God’s as a belt clings to a man’s waist. But they would not hear and obey so He destroyed them. God never says He will redeem them someday.

Can't help but laugh out loud at your comment considering you always post your favorite list of verses which you think supports your view. A list of "cherry picked" verses of your own!
Wrong as usual! Showing you don’t know the meaning of cherry picked. In my list I reviewed all 69 verses where the Greek word “aionios” occurs in the NT. In 24 verses “aionios” occurred with other adjectives/adjectival phrases which tended to define “aionios” as eternal, everlasting etc. While “aionios” does refer to things which are not “eternal,” it never occurs with other adjectives etc. which define it as a limited period of time.
…..,In the list of 26 verses I quote “aionios” is either paired or contrasted with adjectives/phrases which define it as eternal which, as I said, never happens when “aionios” refers to things which are not eternal.
How do I explain it? Hyperbole. In English the same thing occurs with the same word. The English word “eternal” means endless, everlasting etc. but it is often used parabolically e.g. “I went to a certain office today and had to wait in line for an eternity.”

v.7 Of course the converse is true but the verse does not preclude the fact that ALL shall eventually become victorious in keeping with Col 1:20 which is the whole point of Universalism isn't it?
Hold on you don’t get to just blow off anything that refutes you. If being saved by Jesus was unconditional Jesus would not state any conditions but He does. I think I can say without fear of contradiction virtually everything Jesus said about the afterlife was conditional. See e.g. Matt 25:31-46. Jesus never says that the person on the wrong side of a condition does not have to worry because they will be saved anyway.
v.8 Of course those people are thrown into the LOF. What do you suppose they are doing there? Twiddling their thumbs in misery? That could be. However a better indicator is found in Revelation 22:
14Blessed are those washing their robes,a that their right will be to the tree of life, and they shall enter into the city by the gates. 15Outside are the dogs, and the sorcerers, and the sexually immoral, and the murderers, and the idolaters, and everyone loving and practicing falsehood.
The New Jerusalem has already come down to earth per Revelation 21 which you cited and God is among His people which you already noted in v.3. In Revelation 22 John further describes the city including the lake of fire outside. Note in v.14 note that πλύνοντες is a present tense participle better translated as "washing." Since the saints are already in the city and God is among His people as you have already acknowledged, WHO IS WASHING THEIR ROBES? Aren't the saints in the city already supposed to have their robes washed and clean?? Since the saints are already in the city and God is among His people as you have already acknowledged, who WILL HAVE THE RIGHT TO THE TREE OF LIFE and SHALL ENTER INTO THE CITY BY THE GATES?? The saints are already in the city so who else is allowed to enter? The only possible answer is THOSE OUTSIDE THE CITY in the lake of fire v.15.
How do the unrighteous in the LoF wash their robes? I see nothing about washing of robes in any of the mentions of the lake of fire but I do see torment for ever and ever.
Total rubbish as you diminish the power and sovereignty of God. What God wills, He will indeed accomplish. His hand is not too short to do whatever He wills but it's your prerogative to deny it. I prefer to take God at his word that ALL be saved.
Read Jeremiah 13:9-14 about God accomplishing His will.
Oh brother; you repeat your same argument again. Perhaps your memory is fading? Do you not remember that I wrote to you in another thread that "eternal life" refers to life in the Millennial Age which is why in speaking to the rich young ruler who was a Jew, Jesus equated 'eternal life' with the kingdom of heaven, the kingdom of God. Jesus himself defined 'eternal life' for us and he did not mean 'foRevelationer.' I informed you that the Jews were looking forward to an AGE OF TIME; i.e., MILLENNIUM where Jesus would conquer all her enemies and Israel would live in God's kingdom on earth in an era of peace. My explanation didn't sit well with you as you denied that the Jews were looking forward to the coming Millennial Age with Jesus as their conquering King instead of the Lamb slain on the cross - despite my quoting from the Jewish Encyclopedia. It's your choice to continue denying the fact that aionion refers to an age of time - not eternal. I prefer Jesus' own definition.
Wrong as usual, I denied nothing, I asked for evidence. You did not show that the Jews always understood “aionios” as referring to the millennium kingdom especially when I have proved from 26 verses, 9 of which Jesus, Himself, was speaking, that “aionios” was shown to mean eternal.
I too prefer Jesus’ definition. Jesus very likely knew about the expected millennium kingdom, but He defined “aionios” as eternal in 9 verses, which you continue to ignore; John 6:58, John 10:28, John 3;15, John 3;16, John 5:24, John 3;36, John 4;14, John 6:27, John 8:51

Revelation 21:4 And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
Revelation 21:5 And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful.
Revelation 21:7-8
(7) He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.
This spoken from the throne, note a condition, the converse is the one who does not overcome will NOT inherit all things. Please read the rest of Rev 21-22 and show me where everyone will be reconciled no matter what.
(8) But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
After no more death, vs. 4, all things new vs. 5, 8 groups of people thrown into the lake of fire, which is still the second death.
Revelation 21:10
(10) And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and shewed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God,
Revelation 22:11
(11) He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still.
This cannot be because according to UR everybody will have been saved by this time.
Revelation 22:12
(12) And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.
Revelation 22:14
(14) Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
Only those who do His commandments have the right to the tree of life which excludes the unjust and filthy, vs. 11 and dogs, sorcerers, whoremongers, murderers and idolaters.
Revelation 22:15
(15) For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.
Revelation 22:18
(18) For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
Please show me in Rev. where dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, murderers, idolater,vs. 15, unjust and filthy vs. 11 will be saved.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So timoria is redundant then?
I don't read Greek but used to speak just enough of it to get me into trouble
.
The primary meaning of "timoria" is "avenge." Here is a link to the 1957 edition of BAGD, as it was known then, for those who want to know the meaning of Greek words. I started learning to speak Greek working with Greek workers in Germany the year that Elvis and I were there, at different bases. I studied both Hebrew and Greek at the graduate level about 2 decades afterward.
A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, Gingrich & Danker
 
Upvote 0

Shrewd Manager

Through him, in all things, more than conquerors.
Site Supporter
Aug 16, 2019
4,167
4,081
Melbourne
✟364,409.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The primary meaning of "timoria" is "avenge." Here is a link to the 1957 edition of BAGD, as it was known then, for those who want to know the meaning of Greek words. I started learning to speak Greek working with Greek workers in Germany the year that Elvis and I were there, at different bases. I studied both Hebrew and Greek at the graduate level about 2 decades afterward.
A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, Gingrich & Danker

Thanks but I've seen enough to convince me there's a strong case that the Greeks of the day considered at least the connotation of kolasis to be in serving a corrective purpose. I would be guided in principle by the interpretation that leads to life. In the Bible death leads to life, everything does, because He is the God of the living, Jesus is the life, the author of life, and the Spirit gives life. Jesus came to save the world from death and him who holds the power of it. He takes away the sin of the world whose wages are death, he releases the prisoners, and death is swallowed up in victory. So in my book Zoe wins, and that's one for the money.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Thanks but I've seen enough to convince me there's a strong case that the Greeks of the day considered at least the connotation of kolasis to be in serving a corrective purpose. I would be guided in principle by the interpretation that leads to life. In the Bible death leads to life, everything does, because He is the God of the living, Jesus is the life, the author of life, and the Spirit gives life. Jesus came to save the world from death and him who holds the power of it. He takes away the sin of the world whose wages are death, he releases the prisoners, and death is swallowed up in victory. So in my book Zoe wins, and that's one for the money.
You may have seen enough evidence to convince yourself that your assumptions/presuppositions are correct but you have not presented enough evidence to convince many nonbelievers.
Fortunately or unfortunately, as the case may be, many people look beyond the proof texts that people present to make their case, as I have done.
Anyone can make the Bible say almost anything they want it to by putting several verses together regardless of their individual context as you have done above.
 
Upvote 0

Shrewd Manager

Through him, in all things, more than conquerors.
Site Supporter
Aug 16, 2019
4,167
4,081
Melbourne
✟364,409.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You may have seen enough evidence to convince yourself that your assumptions/presuppositions are correct but you have not presented enough evidence to convince many nonbelievers.
Fortunately or unfortunately, as the case may be, many people look beyond the proof texts that people present to make their case, as I have done.
Anyone can make the Bible say almost anything they want it to by putting several verses together regardless of their individual context as you have done above.

Choose life der Alter. For God is good. Vengeance is His, and it's not timoria.
 
Upvote 0

Oldmantook

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2017
3,633
1,526
65
USA
✟106,673.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Dear Oldman: Enquiring minds will wait and wait and wait to no avail. LOL.

Kolasis aionion -Matthew 25:46-

Greek scholar William Barclay wrote concerning kolasis aionion (age-during corrective chastisement) in Matthew 25:46

“The Greek word for punishment is kolasis, which was not originally an ethical word at all. It originally meant the pruning of trees to make them grow better. There is no instance in Greek secular literature where kolasis does not mean remedial punishment. It is a simple fact that in Greek kolasis always means remedial punishment. God’s punishment is always for man’s cure.”

Fifteen literally translated (not interpretively translated) Bibles that reveal what God will do with the sinners in Matthew 25:46

Concordant Literal, Young’s literal, Wilson’s Emphatic Diaglott, Rotherham’s Emphasized, Scarlett’s, J.W. Hanson’s New Covenant, Twentieth Century, Ferrar Fenton, The Western New Testament, Weymouth’s (unedited), Clementson’s, The New Testament of our Lord and Savior Jesus Anointed, The Restoration of Original Sacred Name Bible, Bullinger’s Companion Bible margins, Jonathan Mitchell’s translation (2010).

Concerning the duration of kolasis (literally - corrective punishment), Matt. 25:46 says (KJV),

“And these shall go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into life eternal.”

Scarlett’s New Testament written in 1792 has “aeonian punishment” in place to “everlasting punishment.”

“And these will go away into aeonian punishment: but the righteous into aeonian life.”

The New Covenant by Dr. J.W. Hanson written in 1884 renders Matt. 25:46:

“And these shall go away into aeonian chastisement, and the just into aeonian life.”

Young’s Literal Translation first published in 1898 and reprinted many times since uses the following words:

“And these shall go away to punishment age-during, but the righteous to life age-during.”

Professor Young also compiled Young’s Concordance, where one can check the translation of each Hebrew or Greek word as translated in the KJV.

The Twentieth Century New Testament first printed in the year 1900 has:

“And these last will go away ‘into aeonian punishment,’ but the righteous ‘into aeonian life.’”

The Holy Bible in Modern English by Ferrar Fenton first published in 1903 gives the rendering:

"And these He will dismiss into a long correction, but the well-doers to an enduring life.

The New Testament in Modern Speech, by Dr. Weymouth, says:

“And these shall go away into punishment of the ages, but the righteous into life of the ages.”

Dr. Weymouth most frequently adopts such terms as “life of the ages,” “fire of the ages;” and in Rev. 14:6, “The good news of the ages.”

It is a matter to regret that the editors of the most recent edition of Dr. Weymouth’s version have reverted to the KJV renderings for the passages containing the Greek word aion, eon, or age.

The Western New Testament published in 1926 renders Matt. 25:46 as follows:

“And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into life eternal.”

The translation, however, has a footnote on Matthew 21:19 on the word “forever” which is the same word for “eternal” which says: "Literally, for the age.”

Clementson’s The New Testament (1938) shows,

“And these shall go away into eonian correction, but the righteous into eonian life.”

Wilson’s Emphatic Diaglott (1942 edition) translates the verse,

“And these shall go forth to the aionian cutting-off; but the righteous to aionian life.”

It should be noted that the “cutting-off” refers to pruning a fruit tree to make it bear more fruit.

The idea behind the word is not destructive but productive! Had Jesus wanted to emphasize a destructive end, He would have used the word “timoria.”

The Concordant Version (1930):

“And these shall be coming away into chastening eonian, yet the just into life eonian.”

The New Testament of our Lord and Savior Jesus Anointed printed in 1958 says:

“And these shall go away into agelasting cutting-off and the just into agelasting life.”

Joseph B. Rotherham, in his Emphasized Bible (1959), translates this verse,

“and these shall go away into age-abiding correction, but the righteous into age-abiding life.”

The Restoration of Original Sacred Name Bible copyrighted in 1976

has “age-abiding correction” instead of “everlasting punishment.”

Jonathan Mitchell’s N.T.Translation

"And so, these folks will be going off into an eonian pruning (a lopping-off which lasts for an undetermined length of time; an age-lasting correction; a pruning which has its source and character in the Age), yet the fair and just folks who are in right relationship and are in accord with the Way pointed out [go off] into eonian life (life which has it source and character in the Age; life pertaining to the Age)”.

Even some King James Study Bibles will show the reader in the margins or appendixes that the King’s translators were incorrect in their rendering of "eternal punishment.”

The great Companion Bible by Dr. Bullinger is an example of that.

Greek scholar William Barclay wrote concerning kolasis aionion (age-during corrective chastisement) in Matthew 25:46

“The Greek word for punishment is kolasis, which was not originally an ethical word at all. It originally meant the pruning of trees to make them grow better. There is no instance in Greek secular literature where kolasis does not mean remedial punishment. It is a simple fact that in Greek kolasis always means remedial punishment. God’s punishment is always for man’s cure.”
I agree that the punishment is remedial and not forever. Matt 25:46 is probably the bedrock verse for those who subscribe to eternal conscious torment in the lake of fire. What they fail to realize though is that the obvious context of this verse references the Second Coming of Jesus prior to the Millennium as stated in v.31. The nations are those peoples that are still alive at Jesus' return - separated into the goat and sheep nations. This is not the the great white throne judgment, which takes place after the Millennium when the dead are resurrected and judged (Rev 20:13-14). Thus you have people who are alive at Jesus' return being judged versus the resurrected dead being judged at the GWT - two different groups and time periods. That is why aionion cannot mean "eternal" in both clauses of Matt 25:46 because they do not reference eternity. Instead aionion references Jesus' reign on the earth where the sheep populate the Millennial kingdom for an AGE of time - 1,000 years. The same applies for the goats who are commanded to depart into the lake of fire, also for an Age of time - 1,000 years.
 
Upvote 0

Oldmantook

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2017
3,633
1,526
65
USA
✟106,673.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I have answered this question multiple times. Matt 25:46 says eternal life and eternal punishment. The duration of the punishment is equal to the duration of the life. Jesus is quoted as using the word death seventeen times in the gospels. In Matt 25 if Jesus had wanted to mean death in vs. 46 He would have used the word for death, not punishment.
Like a broken record, you have merely repeated yourself a few times lacking any substance in your thought processes, not to mention lack of scriptural warrant. I suggest you reference my post #517 and learn something.

Since you will not address my posts why should I waste time responding to yours?
Read Jeremiah 3:9-13 God’s will clearly stated was that the whole house of Israel and the whole house of Judah to cling to God’s as a belt clings to a man’s waist. But they would not hear and obey so He destroyed them. God never says He will redeem them someday.
Do you read the OT? Do you even read the passage you cited? V.12 states...for I am merciful, declares the LORD; I will not be angry forever.
If you just bothered to read further in Jeremiah, you would find in 31:33 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people.
And in Isaiah 45:17 But Israel will be saved by the LORD with an everlasting salvation; you will never be put to shame or disgraced, to ages everlasting.
I suggest you dust off your OT before presuming the total opposite of what it actually states.

,In the list of 26 verses I quote “aionios” is either paired or contrasted with adjectives/phrases which define it as eternal which, as I said, never happens when “aionios” refers to things which are not eternal.
How do I explain it? Hyperbole. In English the same thing occurs with the same word. The English word “eternal” means endless, everlasting etc. but it is often used parabolically e.g. “I went to a certain office today and had to wait in line for an eternity.”
Baloney. I'm still waiting for your explanation of Matt 25:46 where aionion clearly cannot mean eternal. Do you deny aionion refers to the Millennial Age in the verse? Yes or no? Simple question.

You did not show that the Jews always understood “aionios” as referring to the millennium kingdom especially when I have proved from 26 verses, 9 of which Jesus, Himself, was speaking, that “aionios” was shown to mean eternal.
I quoted from the Jewish Encyclopedia itself. You provided no evidence whatsoever to contradict it. Do you deny the Jews were expecting their Messiah to establish an era of peace on the earth with Jesus as their conquering King? Yes or no? Simple question.

Please show me in Rev. where dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, murderers, idolater,vs. 15, unjust and filthy vs. 11 will be saved.
Did you not read my previous post to you where I detailed exactly that. I highly suggest you do so and become enlightened.
 
Upvote 0

Shrewd Manager

Through him, in all things, more than conquerors.
Site Supporter
Aug 16, 2019
4,167
4,081
Melbourne
✟364,409.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I agree that the punishment is remedial and not forever. Matt 25:46 is probably the bedrock verse for those who subscribe to eternal conscious torment in the lake of fire. What they fail to realize though is that the obvious context of this verse references the Second Coming of Jesus prior to the Millennium as stated in v.31. The nations are those peoples that are still alive at Jesus' return - separated into the goat and sheep nations. This is not the the great white throne judgment, which takes place after the Millennium when the dead are resurrected and judged (Rev 20:13-14). Thus you have people who are alive at Jesus' return being judged versus the resurrected dead being judged at the GWT - two different groups and time periods. That is why aionion cannot mean "eternal" in both clauses of Matt 25:46 because they do not reference eternity. Instead aionion references Jesus' reign on the earth where the sheep populate the Millennial kingdom for an AGE of time - 1,000 years. The same applies for the goats who are commanded to depart into the lake of fire, also for an Age of time - 1,000 years.

Could be, may I suggest another issue is that Jesus sets an impossible standard in the preceding verses - so much as ye did not help even ONE OF THE LEAST. I mean, we could (and should) all do much more in the way of charitable works. The fact is we overlook beggars and the sick all the time (forgive us Lord), but on this teaching everyone would be condemned. Would it not result in damnation of all, whether for eternity or a millennium?
 
Upvote 0

Oldmantook

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2017
3,633
1,526
65
USA
✟106,673.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Could be, may I suggest another issue is that Jesus sets an impossible standard in the preceding verses - so much as ye did not help even ONE OF THE LEAST. I mean, we could (and should) all do much more in the way of charitable works. The fact is we overlook beggars and the sick all the time (forgive us Lord), but on this teaching everyone would be condemned. Would it not result in damnation of all, whether for eternity or a millennium?
Your point is well taken but it is critical to understand who the "sheep" are in Matt 25. I do not believe they are believers. I believe they are unbelievers in the nations who still alive at Jesus' return. They are not regenerate believers but because of their good works done unto the brethren, Jesus commends them and consequently allows them to live in the millennium. They are mortals with flesh and blood who repopulate the earth during the millennium. This is contrasted with the believers who are alive at Jesus' return and the saints who are already dead in Christ and are resurrected. All together, the saints rule and reign with Christ over those sheep nations which repopulate the earth during the millennium. Rev 20:6 Blessed and holy are those who share in the first resurrection. The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for a thousand years.

The goal of every Christian is not "eternal life" for a couple of reasons I can think of. First, the Bible never teaches that the saints spend eternity in heaven with God. The fact is that the New Jerusalem comes down from heaven and that is where the saints finally dwell. Secondly, since aionion life, etc. cannot mean eternal life but instead - age during life - just what age is being referred to? I believe that the answer is the millennial age.
Rev 20:4 I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony about Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
Rev 2:26 To the one who is victorious and does my will to the end, I will give authority over the nations.
Rev 3:21 To the one who overcomes, I will grant the right to sit with Me on My throne, just as I overcame and sat down with My Father on His throne.
Rev 1:6 and He has made us to be a kingdom, priests to His God and Father....
Rev 5:10 You have made them to be a kingdom and priests to serve our God, and they will reign upon the earth.
1 Cor 6:2-3 Do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life!
Matt 25:23 His master replied, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master!’
Lk 19:17-19 And he said to him, ‘Well done, good servant!c Because you have been faithful in a very little, you shall have authority over ten cities.’ And the second came, saying, ‘Lord, your mina has made five minas.’ And he said to him, ‘And you are to be over five cities.’


The goal of every Christian is to overcome and persevere in the faith, even if it means martyrdom in order to gain aionion life in the Millennium and be given the privilege to co-reign with Christ over the sheep nations.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0