Cribstyl said:
Question, Are they preaching that Sabbath should be kept
They are teaching
"what matters is KEEPING the Commandments of God" 1 Cor 7:19
"he who breaks one of the commandments - breaks them all" James 2
"there REMAINS therefore a Sabbath rest for the people of God" Heb 4
"'Honor your father and mother' is the FIRST commandment WITH a promise" Eph 6:2 - in that still-valid unit of TEN
I am quoting texts that some folks here - never quote because they find the information there to be "inconvenient"
You are actually exposing Sabbatarians methods of teaching
Indeed - we call it "sola scriptura" where what the Bible says - matters even if the details are deemed "inconvenient" by others.
At least we agree on something.
No, Paul is not teaching that we're under the law. That's what you are always trying to teach.
Quoting "you" then blaming it on 'me' as if I say whatever you claim is not a compelling solution.
You have ignored every text I just gave - and then made up a new statement for me.
Were we simply "not supposed to notice"?? What is the thinking in that sort of solution?
Your quote from 1 Cor 7:19 is a partial quote that's isolated and taken out of context.
And you don't quote 1 Cor 7:18-20 at all as if that is the better view of 1 Cor 7:19 -- to simply avoid it?
How is that compelling?
1 Cor 7:18-20 shows that ceremonial laws like circumcision do not continue to matter but moral laws such as the "Commandments of God" do.
And you don't quote it at ALL - just to show how accurate your method is??? seriously??
18 Was any man called when he was already circumcised? He is not to become uncircumcised. Has anyone been called in uncircumcision? He is not to be circumcised.
19 Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but what matters is the keeping of the commandments of God. 20 Each person is to remain in that state in which he was called.
There is a clear contrast in vs 19 between moral law of God as "Commandments of God" that apply in all circumstances vs the ceremonial law such as cirumcision.
Notice how your post entirely ignores that whole section of the chapter that is filled with a number of different topics
What is Paul calling "keeping the commandments of God"?
1 Cor 7 is written to Corinthian Christians who had question about marriage and relationship with women.
1Co 7:1 Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman.
1Co 7:2 Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.
The context shows that Paul distinguished his opinion from commandments from God about marriage and how to treat women.
1Co 7:10 And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband:
1Co 7:12 But to the rest speak I, not the Lord: If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be pleased to dwell with him, let him not put her away.
So, it's fake news that Paul is talking about the Ten Commandments.
and apparently you view the topic of vs 18-19 as too inconvenient to even quote or discuss?? seriously?? Paul contrasts the ten commandments with the issue of gentiles being converted and then being circumcised. Obviously.
Paul writes to gentiles in Eph 6:2 saying "'honor your father and mother' is the first commandment with a promise" in that still-valid unit of ten.
James's ministry is among the circumcision and not to the Gentiles (uncircumcision)
scripture is for humans and is inspired by God and that includes the NT as it turns out.
Gal 1:6-9
denies the claim that there is more than one gospel.
James says that to break one is to break them all - and that the person in transgression is convicted by the Law of God -- of sin.
John says "
Sin IS transgression of the LAW" 1 John 3:4.
Paul says it is only the
lost that "do not submit to the Law of God ..neither indeed can they" Rom 8:4-11
His letter is addressed to the 12 tribes.
Jas 1:1 James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.
There is endless wisdom to glean from James, but you're looking to highjack words about keeping the law.
your term "hijack" seems to be defined as "you actually quote sections of James that go against my preference and don't fit my doctrine".
In your "only applies to Jewish christians" suggestion you appear to toss all of James 2 out the window -- specifically this part
2 For if a man comes into your assembly with a gold ring and is dressed in bright clothes, and a poor man in dirty clothes also comes in, 3 and you pay special attention to the one who is wearing the bright clothes, and say, “You sit here in a good place,” and you say to the poor man, “You stand over there, or sit down by my footstool,” 4 have you not made distinctions among yourselves, and become judges with evil motives? 5 Listen, my beloved brothers and sisters: did God not choose the poor of this world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom which He promised to those who love Him? 6 But you have dishonored the poor man. Is it not the rich who oppress you and personally drag you into court? 7 Do they not blaspheme the good name by which you have been called?
8 If, however, you are fulfilling the royal law according to the Scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing well. 9 But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the Law as violators.
hmm so that is Lev 19:18 you are not quoting yet it is quoted by Paul in Rom 13, by Christ in Matt 19, by James in James 2... but you avoid it?
9 But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the Law as violators. 10 For whoever keeps the whole Law, yet stumbles in one point, has become guilty of all.10 For whoever keeps the whole Law, yet stumbles in one point, has become guilty of all. 11 For He who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not murder.” Now if you do not commit adultery, but do murder, you have become a violator of the Law.
That is yet another section you say only applies to Jews -- seriously? gentiles not subject to 'do not murder'??? How does that even happen??
12 So speak, and so act, as those who are to be judged by the law of freedom. 13 For judgment will be merciless to one who has shown no mercy; mercy triumphs over judgment.
I find it hard to believe that when confronted with this text your response is of the form "only applies to Jewish Christians"
===================
Out of curiosity - are you interested at all in the title/subject of this thread regarding evolutionism vs the teaching in God's Word in Ex 20:11 and Gen 2:1-3? OR are you responding "in that context" by saying evolution is ok since the commandment of God in this case does not matter?