Ted Cruz rails against Anheuser-Busch for stonewalling his probe of partnership with Dylan Mulvaney

[HARK!]

Right here:

Ted Cruz rails against Anheuser-Busch for stonewalling his probe of partnership with Dylan Mulvaney​

I don't see the connection. Maybe you can break it down into a logical argument.

 

[HARK!]

You should really read your own links:
“The review panel completed its inquest and found ‘absolutely nothing’ in Dylan Mulvaney’s Instagram posts ‘that would have special attractiveness below the legal drinking age,’ according to its report.

The panel also reported that the beer company hired an outside firm to review Dylan Mulvaney’s Instagram audience age demographics, which found that over 80% of the influencer’s followers were 21 years or older. The marketing code has a compliance standard of over 73%.

A spokesperson for Anheuser-Busch InBev told The Washington Times that the company takes ‘its role in promoting responsible drinking very seriously, and our marketing is directed to adults of legal drinking age’.”

Point taken. So if AB has alrady turned over their demographics to a review panel; then what is the harm in letting Cruz review it?

 

[Wings like Eagles]

“When did you quit beating your wife?”—would you answer a loaded question like that?

Now that we all know, the question is, do you understand what a millstone is and why one would be hung around a persons neck.

 

[Pommer]

Now that we all know, the question is, do you understand what a millstone is and why one would be hung around a persons neck.

You’re concerned that a 20 year old might see Bud light ads and think “why should I wait another year until I grab me a Bud light?”

 

[Pommer]

Point taken. So if AB has alrady turned over their demographics to a review panel; then what is the harm in letting Cruz review it?

I’m guessing that the fine people at AB-InBev do not wish to find out “what harm” releasing these documents could maybe do?

 

[HARK!]

I’m guessing that the fine people at AB-InBev do not wish to find out “what harm” releasing these documents could maybe do?

Well it was already reviewed by the foxes at the review board. What could possibly go wrong?

 

[Pommer]

Well it was already reviewed by the foxes at the review board. What could possibly go wrong?

This is Ted Cruz we’re talking about, could be nothing? Could be barrel-bacon? Who knows?

 

[Ceallaigh]

The connection was pushed by bigoted conservatives, not the trans community.

Oh so that's who's behind drag queen story hour and LGBTQ curriculm in elementry schools and mobs marching down the street chanting "we're here, we're queer, we're coming for your children!" etc.

 

[iluvatar5150]

Oh so that's who's behind drag queen story hour and LGBTQ curriculm in elementry schools and mobs marching down the street chanting "we're here, we're queer, we're coming for your children!" etc.

The chant was an obvious (albeit ill-advised IMO) attempt at trolling the right regarding their pearl clutching about kids. Your side ought to be embarrassed that you guys can’t tell the difference between a genuine threat and sarcasm.

 

[NxNW]

Are Liberal values in opposition to protecting children from poisons?

The conservative viewpoint is that cigarette smoke is harmless, so I doubt it.

 

[Ceallaigh]

The chant was an obvious (albeit ill-advised IMO) attempt at trolling the right regarding their pearl clutching about kids. Your side ought to be embarrassed that you guys can’t tell the difference between a genuine threat and sarcasm.

That argument might work if it wasn't for drag queen story hour, drag queen shows for kids and LGBTQ curriculum in elementry schools etc. It's like they get deeply involved with children, and then start that chant, but it's just supposed to be sarcasm and satire, even though it's actually happening in spades.

 

[Pommer]

That argument might work if it wasn't for drag queen story hour, drag queen shows for kids and LGBTQ curriculum in elementry schools etc. It's like they get deeply involved with children, and then start that chant, but it's just supposed to be sarcasm and satire, even though it's actually happening in spades.

The Law of the land says that people who are LGBTQIA+ cannot be discriminated against in employment or public accommodations and the earlier kids begin to know this, the better, so that they can respect the Laws that we all live under.

 

[Ceallaigh]

The Law of the land says that people who are LGBTQIA+ cannot be discriminated against in employment or public accommodations and the earlier kids begin to know this, the better, so that they can respect the Laws that we all live under.

The law of the land says people period can not be discriminated against. Drag queen story hour, drag queen shows for kids with erotic kinky outfits, and teaching little kids in elementary school about all the multiple genders and orientations they can be, obviously doesn't really have anything to do with that.

 

[Pommer]

The law of the land says people period can not be discriminated against. Drag queen story hour, drag queen shows for kids with erotic kinky outfits, and teaching little kids in elementary school about all the multiple genders and orientations they can be, obviously doesn't really have anything to do with that.

What does it have to do with?

 

[Ceallaigh]

What does it have to do with?

All of the LGBTQQIP2SAA+ stuff involving children doesn't really have anything to do with a fight against discrimination, but rather it's about gaining control over society.

 

[iluvatar5150]

That argument might work if it wasn't for drag queen story hour, drag queen shows for kids and LGBTQ curriculum in elementry schools etc. It's like they get deeply involved with children, and then start that chant, but it's just supposed to be sarcasm and satire, even though it's actually happening in spades.

The argument would work if your side understood sarcasm.

If a clown were reading to kids at the library, would you be concerned that the clown was trying to recruit them into clown college? No? Then why do you fear that drag queens are trying to recruit them into being lgbtq?

 

[Ceallaigh]

The argument would work if your side understood sarcasm.

If a clown were reading to kids at the library, would you be concerned that the clown was trying to recruit them into clown college? No? Then why do you fear that drag queens are trying to recruit them into being lgbtq?

Clowns aren't all about sexuality, multiple genders and multiple sexual orientations. Drag queens are. What LGBTQQIP2SAA+ wants to recruit is a society that happily goes along with whatever they want.

 

[Wings like Eagles]

The argument would work if your side understood sarcasm.

If a clown were reading to kids at the library, would you be concerned that the clown was trying to recruit them into clown college? No? Then why do you fear that drag queens are trying to recruit them into being lgbtq?

Clown college, you are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

 

[Pommer]

All of the LGBTQQIP2SAA+ stuff involving children doesn't really have anything to do with a fight against discrimination, but rather it's about gaining control over society.

Yes, one day our children will be running things, that’s why they should have all the requisite knowledge of “who is ’allowed’ where/when” before they take over.

 

[Pommer]

The argument would work if your side understood sarcasm.

If a clown were reading to kids at the library, would you be concerned that the clown was trying to recruit them into clown college? No? Then why do you fear that drag queens are trying to recruit them into being lgbtq?

“Clowns* don’t do it for the sexual-jollies that drag queens do!” [Not a direct quote AFAIK, but it’ve seen this sentiment here before]

*I’m sure every party-clown can probably pass a background check, maybe.