Still funny how you only ever get this code after the science supposedly described in the Bible has already been predicted, discovered, quantified and published by the actual scientists, isn't it?
Well, that's the power of the Bible as "Truth" (c). It is so true that it only appears true after some other way of discovering truth discovers it and then the Bible can shine!
It's so much fun to see folks like AV use science to explain strange turns of phrase in the bible and then
viola the Bible was the one who spoke the science first!
Too bad the Bible isn't capable of being used to actually
do science.
I would dearly love it if the Bible were to have in it something that no one believed but science ultimately had to accept.
And it was clearly stated and didn't require any fancy exegesis to understand it before the fact.
That would be a truly wonderful thing. Even the kind of God who "embeds" age and destroys concepts like "history"
for appearance sake, would agree that that would be "good".
Unfortunately Biblical Exegetes like AV treat the Bible in such a way that it becomes no better than a "horoscope" or Nostradamus stuff. In those cases people take strangely worded, opaquely phrased items and read into them whatever they want to.
Unfortunately in the end it ruins any sort of concept of "Ultimate Truth".
God, if he existed, would surely value clarity and openess and honesty above all else. Nothing would be shrouded in mist and obfuscation.
But maybe I expect too much from an all-knowing, all-loving, all-just omnipotent omnibenevolent being.
I'm just not made for a second rate huckster being in charge of the universe. I'm made wrong.