Not my version, it's one of probably hundreds of versions that are actually the true versions, just ask their Christian followers, they'll tell you so. Why should anyone accept yours as any more correct over theirs? You simply don't have a convincing case.
I agree IF that's all I have but it's not. God's Truth AGREES in every way with every discovery of Science and History. Read on....
Are you telling me that God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit are a single-celled microbe that 'they' modelled the source of all life forms on this planet from (i.e. as you say: "after Their (Trinity) kind")? You make much less sense every time you write something. Then of course you have to explain why Birds, and in later verses, all the Beasts are also modelled off "His (Jesus) kind" seperately, which might indicate you think Jesus either flies, and/or walks on all fours before assuming human form? Could you explain?
Of course not. God is an invisible Spirit and manifests Himself as the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Their kind is made like a born again Christian, and made an invisible Spirit, an immortal Spirit, inside mankind. Jesus made the birds and beasts from the ground on the 6th Day and Adam named them. Gen 2:19 They are the "common ancestors" since they are temporary and subject to death. God's (Trinity's) creation of birds and cattle is an Eternal Creation since they will be in Heaven forever Gen 1:21 with Him. Their kind is Eternal and His kind is temporal. Amen?
Why not? Firstly, I don't think it is scientifically true, so there's a big tell-tale sign right there. Secondly, even if you're right about it being a 'scientific Truth' (I'm FAR from conceding this point, along with many more Christians than not too, I imagine), then the fact that there's way more believers of even the KJV that don't accept your interpretations would have to indicate the lack of clarity and meaning that a God would surely have. If men had written it, then this difference in ways to interpret these passages (like every other passage in the Bible) is easily explained, so on the available facts (that there's thousands of different Christian denominations, all believeing different things based on their reading of the same texts), it'd have to have been written by men. You fail yet again.
False, since it doesn't matter what one believes but instead, whether one is born again Spiritually by God the Father, Who gives us Salvation as a Gift of God and that Faith, not of works, lest arrogant mankind take the credit to himself.
Eph 2:8
There's no 'scientific Truth' in this verse. Unless you believe 'they (Trinity)' are microbial, of course.
Tell us which ancient theologian knew that all life came from water 3k years ago, including Whales Birds and every other creature. You cannot.
Do you agree that even your special (KJV) translation of the Bible at
Genesis 1:28 says "And God
blessed them, and God
said unto them, ..." - i.e. Past Tense! This has already happened, so you are wrong here too (what a surprise!
) - it doesn't say "And God
shall bless them, and God
shall say unto them, ..." now, does it?? You have
REINTERPRETED your scripture to mean something other than what it actually says.
False accusation since the Hebrew tenses are not the same as English tenses. The verses are written in Hebrew imperfect tense, which means the actions continue. God is
STILL creating, blessing, etc and He will continue to change sinners into sons of God until Heaven is filled at the end of the present 6th Day/Age in the creation of the perfect 3rd Heaven. That WHY God tell us to Study to show ourselves approved unto Him. Check it out.
And there's no evidence it can happen at the drop of a hat either. That you keep insisting that unevidenced things 'will' happen, doesn't mean it's possible. Come back when you have evidence.
Already have and so far, I have seen no refute to my view that Gen 1:28-31 is prophecy since it is. The end of the present 6th Day is future. The scientific Fact that God told us the specific testable scientific Truth in Genesis, more than 3k years ago, refutes all other views. IMO
So, all up, I got out of this conversation that you do HEAPS of reinterpreting, mixing up the order of events in the Bible to suit a narrative that You Personally want to be True. When critically examined, it just doesn't stack up I'm afraid...
Then refute it either Scripturally, Scientifically or Historically. Many have tried but none has been able to prove God wrong. Most run away and hide in the bushes, waiting for another evolution follower to refute God's Truth. I was hoping you could get at least a few things correct, but I suppose that's too much to ask. God Bless you
