• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Some Reasons I Don't Believe in Evolution

Status
Not open for further replies.

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,860
52,571
Guam
✟5,139,790.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That isn't really an answer to the question I asked.
Good -- I'd hate to break my record.
It obviously wasn't taboo until it was prohibited in writing, but it's only an issue after it was prohibited in writing.
Um ... okay ... no argument there.
Everyone who has ever read both those passages has been aware that incest is wrong, but God chose to use it even though he didn't have to.
Incest is both an act and a crime.

As an act, it was okay until it was prohibited; then it became a crime.
Don't you mean during the flood?
No, I mean after the Flood -- as in Genesis 9.
The idea of an absolute morality flies out the window when you read the OT.
Are you kidding me?
 
Upvote 0

Nostromo

Brian Blessed can take a hike
Nov 19, 2009
2,343
56
Yorkshire
✟25,338.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
As an act, it was okay until it was prohibited; then it became a crime.
It is this inconsistency that I'm talking about.
No, I mean after the Flood -- as in Genesis 9.
An awful lot of people were intentionally killed prior to that.
Are you kidding me?
No, why would I?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,860
52,571
Guam
✟5,139,790.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
It is this inconsistency that I'm talking about.
It is not 'inconsistency'.

As the DNA got more and more corrupt, laws had to be enacted to protect the people.

At a railroad crossing, and in the absence of signs, it's okay to beat a train; but if gates are installed later, then it becomes a violation; and this is not considered an inconsistency.
An awful lot of people were intentionally killed prior to that.
Killed -- but not murdered.
 
Upvote 0

British Bulldog

Active Member
Jul 8, 2011
370
7
south oxfordshire
✟574.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Conservative
It is not 'inconsistency'.

As the DNA got more and more corrupt, laws had to be enacted to protect the people.

At a railroad crossing, and in the absence of signs, it's okay to beat a train; but if gates are installed later, then it becomes a violation; and this is not considered an inconsistency.

Killed -- but not murdered.

So it is just the laws that stop people practicing incest?
 
Upvote 0

Nostromo

Brian Blessed can take a hike
Nov 19, 2009
2,343
56
Yorkshire
✟25,338.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
It is not 'inconsistency'.

As the DNA got more and more corrupt, laws had to be enacted to protect the people.
Scriptural support for that?
At a railroad crossing, and in the absence of signs, it's okay to beat a train; but if gates are installed later, then it becomes a violation; and this is not considered an inconsistency.
And government legislation is not considered morally absolute.
Killed -- but not murdered.
We weren't talking about murder, but the death penalty. All mankind bar 8 were punished by death for their wickedness.
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Didn't your pastor teach you that Jesus will return to an earth inhabited by people?

Or are you an imposter?
I didn't have a pastor. I had a reverend.

I interpret scripture differently than you. I don't have to interpret our species as having been propogated by two individuals, resulting in inevitable incest. The Bible contains maaaaany metaphors.
Who said anything about "two individuals"? We are talking about Jesus returning to an inhabited earth to bring salvation to His people. Didn't your reverend teach you that?

If your reverend did, then what's this nonsense all about:
What he should probably know is all life on earth eventually will die. Humans won't be on earth quadrillions of years from now. The sun will have expanded to the size of a red giant, and will swallow everything in its path, including us.
:confused:
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
No, because creationists was there, and someone wanted to change it to design proponents. So they attempted to highlight creationists so they could just paste-replace it. But they only highlighted a portion of it; the 'reation' part. So the c-------ists part was left behind, with design proponents stuck into it. Hence, cdesign proponentsists.
Okay, so the letters in "creationists" were bigger than the letters in "design proponents"? Is that it?

design proponents
ocreationists

Or was "design proponents" written diagonally across "creationists"?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,860
52,571
Guam
✟5,139,790.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Okay, so the letters in "creationists" were bigger than the letters in "design proponents"? Is that it?
Remember, Dove, we were first called 'Christians' by our antagonists.

Wear the 'cdesign proponentsists' badge as a blessing.

After all, if not for the grace of God, we could very well be the ones calling "them" 'cdesign proponentsists'.

Get what I mean?
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Remember, Dove, we were first called 'Christians' by our antagonists.

Wear the 'cdesign proponentsists' badge as a blessing.
I kind-a like it. It has a nice sound to it. :)

I like this one too: 'cdesignchristiansproponentsists'. :)
After all, if not for the grace of God, we could very well be the ones calling "them" 'cdesign proponentsists'.

Get what I mean?
Yup.
 
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
30,699
15,163
Seattle
✟1,174,517.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Remember, Dove, we were first called 'Christians' by our antagonists.

Wear the 'cdesign proponentsists' badge as a blessing.

After all, if not for the grace of God, we could very well be the ones calling "them" 'cdesign proponentsists'.

Get what I mean?


Actually, you where called atheists and killed for it. Kind of ironic in a way.
 
Upvote 0

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
48
Burnaby
Visit site
✟36,546.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP
Okay, so the letters in "creationists" were bigger than the letters in "design proponents"? Is that it?

design proponents
ocreationists

Or was "design proponents" written diagonally across "creationists"?

What are you smoking? It's quite simple. Go reply to this comment. In the place where you type your response, type in the word creationists. Also type in the words design proponents. Done? Excellent! Now, use your mouse to highlight design proponents, right-click and select copy. Now go to the word creationists, and again using your mouse, highlight the reation part of it. Right-click on that and select paste. The design proponents part that you copied will be inserted to replace the highlighted reation part and voila! you get cdesign proponentsists!
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.