Some honest answers please...

[Subduction Zone]

Sorry the definition of the word seems almost written for you!

Myth
noun
1.
a traditional or legendary story, usually concerning some being or hero or event, with or without a determinable basis of fact or a natural explanation, especially one that is concerned with deities or demigods and explains some practice, rite, or phenomenon of nature.
2.
stories or matter of this kind:
realm of myth.
3.
any invented story, idea, or concept:
His account of the event is pure myth.
4.
an imaginary or fictitious thing or person.
.
an unproved or false collective belief that is used to justify a social institution.


The claims you make are all without a determinable basis of fact, especially your claims of no flood, or calling bible characters myths. Your claims of dating and a past nature are invented, and unproven. It is the collective belief of evolution you preach. Everything about your posts is myth.

Since there never was a Noah or an Adam you just supported my claim that the stories are a myth.

Remember, without any evidence you lose.

dad, it is abundantly clear that you do not even understand what is and what is not evidence. Why don't you try to learn? You won't keep making the same errors if you learn what is and what is not evidence.

 

[dad]

The "same state past" has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. You have no evidence for your beliefs.

Once again, without any evidence you lose.

Total myth.

 

[dad]

Since there never was a Noah or an Adam

Your claim is without a determinable basis of fact.

Remember, when you reject God's given evidence in Scripture without any evidence you lose.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Total myth.

Those are your beliefs. The beliefs that you still have not been able to support at all.

You like to remind the lurkers occasionally. Why have you not reminded the lurkers that you have not posted any evidence.

dad, living in fear will get you nowhere. I can help.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Your claim is without a determinable basis of fact.

Remember, when you reject God's given evidence in Scripture without any evidence you lose.

Wrong, do you know what it takes to publish a peer reviewed paper? I can find countless peer reviewed papers that support my claims. Your only claim that your myth is not true if your interpretations of the Bible are not correct.

Since you have no evidence it appears that you are the one "rejecting Scripture".

 

[AV1611VET]

What On Earth?

This guy has too much time on his hands, doesn't he?

Count

Count

Count

Count >>>>

Count >>

Count

 

[Subduction Zone]

What On Earth?

You didn't know this? I bring up this point whenever AV tries to intimidate newbies with the number of posts that he has made.

 

[dad]

Wrong, do you know what it takes to publish a peer reviewed paper? .

I even know what it like to comprehend the issues n one and be able to discuss it. You should be so lucky.

 

[dad]

Those are your beliefs. The beliefs that you still have not been able to support at all.

You like to remind the lurkers occasionally. Why have you not reminded the lurkers that you have not posted any evidence.

dad, living in fear will get you nowhere. I can help.

Myth mouthing?

 

[Subduction Zone]

I even know what it like to comprehend the issues n one and be able to discuss it. You should be so lucky.

dad, no. I am sorry, but your comprehension is clearly limited. By you it appears. You refuse to learn. I am not saying that you can't learn. You simply are too afraid to let yourself even learn what is and what is not evidence.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Myth mouthing?

Once again, that would be you.

I am still willing to help you to learn.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

This guy has too much time on his hands, doesn't he?

Count

Count

Count

Count >>>>

Count >>

Count

Maybe when you think you have an eternity to play with, you feel you can waste your brief time alive on this Earth...

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

You didn't know this? I bring up this point whenever AV tries to intimidate newbies with the number of posts that he has made.

It's not so much the post count sham, but the idiotic means to achieve it.

 

[AV1611VET]

It's not so much the post count sham, but the idiotic means to achieve it.

Jealous? or just in the mood to ridicule?

 

[bhsmte]

If he was jealous, you would likely see him in the post count threads.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

Jealous? or just in the mood to ridicule?

I'm not a competitive person, so 'mine's bigger than yours' games don't really interest me; but although I understand the need to fake it, the means seems asinine. YMMV.

 

[AV1611VET]

Jealous? or just in the mood to ridicule?

If he was jealous, you would likely see him in the post count threads.

Just in the mood to ridicule then?

 

[AV1611VET]

I'm not a competitive person, so 'mine's bigger than yours' games don't really interest me;

For the record, I didn't bring up my post count here: someone else did.

AV, there must be a glitch on your stats, how can u possibly have over 3.7 million posts lol?

That is Post 369.

... but although I understand the need to fake it, the means seems asinine. YMMV.

I'm not sure what your beef is with my post count all of a sudden.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

I'm not sure what your beef is with my post count all of a sudden.

Like I said, I don't care what your post count is, or why you've boosted it; it's the way it was done ('counting threads') that I find inane.

Is there some reason behind it beyond having a big post count?

 

[AV1611VET]

Like I said, I don't care what your post count is, or why you've boosted it; it's the way it was done ('counting threads') that I find inane.

Is there some reason behind it beyond having a big post count?

1