- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What about it?Let's discuss what you see there. Can you see the meander?
It is pretty hard to miss.
Do you know what a meander is?
Point out something in a video that supports you? Looking at the second video I see the guy rattle on using dates without any support for them. Is that it?!And have you watched the videos yet dad? You can't even begin to comment on the evidence until you watch the videos.
If you can't be honest there is no point in doing this. You lose by default. If you disagree with any date we can always look it up.Point out something in a video that supports you? Looking at the second video I see the guy rattle on using dates without any support for them. Is that it?!
What about it?
The dates are false. You can't support them.If you can't be honest there is no point in doing this. You lose by default. If you disagree with any date we can always look it up.
If the formation was post flood, how would that matter?We know how meanders form. They form in relatively slow moving streams. Do you need support for this fact?
Wrong. You know that and I know that.The dates are false. You can't support them.
If the formation was post flood, how would that matter?
Welcome back!Should I even ask who did it?
You cannot support the dates, they are belief based entirely, and are based squarely and exclusively on a belief in same state past. Either strongly support/evidence/prove there was one or the dates have no reality or meaning whatsoever.Wrong. You know that and I know that.
You believe in a myth. You should not break the Ninth Commandment by making claims about others that YOU cannot support.
At first appearance it looks like it. Now tell us what geological era this was laid down? Tell us where it is. Etc. Oh, and do tell us a point also, how you think this proves there was no flood! Ha.We will get to that later. Do you understand that that is a meander? If you doubt me I Google searched the term "meanders" and clicked on images. This is the search that came up:
meanders - Google Search
If you look at those images you will see this one among them.
You cannot support the dates, they are belief based entirely, and are based squarely and exclusively on a belief in same state past. Either strongly support/evidence/prove there was one or the dates have no reality or meaning whatsoever.
If you thought you were going to use beliefs in claims about the flood as science, forget it. It won't happen. Get over it forever.
Patience dad. It is clearly a meander. Why do you think that it is not? It is in Utah. And what do you mean by "what geological era this was laid down". You are not clear what you are talking about.At first appearance it looks like it. Now tell us what geological era this was laid down? Tell us where it is. Etc. Oh, and do tell us a point also, how you think this proves there was no flood! Ha.
4 BC.If you want to discuss a date pick one out.
I would have to look it up, but I know who it wasn't.4 BC.
Who is governor of Syria?
Those civilizations were all post flood. Gong!LOL!! You crack me up dad. The dates given are civilization after civilization that did not notice the flood at all.
If you want to discuss a date pick one out.
Your picture is a claim. You must do more than post a pic.By the way dad, when a person makes a claim the burden of proof is upon him.
Unless you can find some clear reliable evidence for your "same state past", you lose.Unless you can find some clear reliable evidence for your "different state past", you lose.
Was it cut out in the Cambrian...or etc etc?Patience dad. It is clearly a meander. Why do you think that it is not? It is in Utah. And what do you mean by "what geological era this was laid down". You are not clear what you are talking about.
It is apparent that you can see that this is a meander. Are you ready to go on?
No thanks.Or we could discuss this video:
**
Or we could discuss this video:
**
Those civilizations were all post flood. Gong![/quoite]
Really? When was the flood? If you want to make that claim you need to be able to prove it. Until you do you have nothing. Those civilizations all existed when literalists like you claim that the flood existed.
By the way "Gong"ing when you have not made a point is a form of dishonesty. Doing so again is admitting that you lost and we will be done here.
Name one in your video.
Your picture is a claim. You must do more than post a pic.[/quoite]
Nope, you already tipped your hand. Tell me when your mythical flood occurred first.
Unless you can find some clear reliable evidence for your "same state past", you lose.
That has been done countless times. The radioactive decay rates observable from distant novae confirm that the laws of physics were the same in the past. You on the other hand have nothing.
Remember dad, the least little bit of evidence beats no evidence at all. You have seen those articles in the past. I can link them again.
You have not provided any evidence at all for your different state past. You set yourself up to lose.
Again.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?