Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The way babies are designed to come about is not the way Adam was created. Adam was not just a special creation, but a created man made on a day that had evening and morning. Babies take many evenings and morning to grow and be born. Our spirits are created and formed in the womb, and when we get saved, we are a new creation etc. But that is not like Adam and Eve.Let us try again. Is every person born today both:
a.) The special creation of God, and
b.) The result of a physical process lasting nine months.
If they are, why are divine origin and physical origin supposed to be mutually exclusive?
Respect topics.Strange, you don't seem to be able to answer any of them.
Scripture is God talking. You can't wave Eve away either.Nope, Bible verses are not "God talking". You dodged a question of mine. Man wrote the Bible in case you forgot. And Eve is merely a fictional character in an allegory at best.
Where else in the bible does it talk of creation? The bible is clear that God created the earth and heaven...start to finish. Trying to claim anything else is delusional.Again, it does not matter. The angel did not speak of your Genesis myth.
? The angel was not yet there?You failed by assuming that he/she was yet there is nothing in that verse that leads to that conclusion.
Respect topics.
Scripture is God talking. You can't wave Eve away either.
Where else in the bible does it talk of creation? The bible is clear that God created the earth and heaven...start to finish. Trying to claim anything else is delusional.
? The angel was not yet there?
Actually, there is.And no, there is no reason to think that scripture is God talking, even if you are a Christian.
If it is allegory ... which it isn't ... then it is anti-Semite.But Genesis is allegory at best.
Actually, there is.
1 Thessalonians 2:13 For this cause also thank we God without ceasing, because, when ye received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe.
If it is allegory ... which it isn't ... then it is anti-Semite.
I see, so by referring to an old argument that you lost you are admitting defeat. Thank you.
When have you ever done that?
Your dreams don't count."Eve" was refuted long ago with much more than a handwave.
False.And no, there is no reason to think that scripture is God talking
Overruled. Rejected.But Genesis is allegory at best.
Jesus disagrees.It really does not matter how the Bible portrays the creation story since it was not meant to be read literally if God is real.
Creation in the bible always refers to Genesis actually. Calling the truth a myth just shows where you are at.Nope, the angel did not mention the myth in your quote. You failed again dad.
And no, there is no reason to think that scripture is God talking, even if you are a Christian. Second Commandment violation.
dad, you always lose. You can't overrule. You can only reject for yourself, but then you only doom yourself to a life of ignorance.Overruled. Rejected.
Jesus disagrees.
Creation in the bible always refers to Genesis actually. Calling the truth a myth just shows where you are at.
It is written in black and white what He said and believed actually.Nope, you have no clue as to what Jesus thinks.
Says you, who could not support your flood doubts in any way. ..Don't bother pretending you did either...you can't post it.But if you want to claim that he was omnipotent the only way that he could disagree would be if he lied, and even when I was a Christian I did not believe in a lying Jesus.
Says you.And the Genesis account is a myth,
No. You failed for years to rationally produce any evidence or case against it. Now anyone that pays attention knows you just blather on and on without ever doing anything else.We can discuss why we know it is a myth,
It is written in black and white what He said and believed actually.
Says you, who could not support your flood doubts in any way. ..Don't bother pretending you did either...you can't post it.
Says you.
No. You failed for years to rationally produce any evidence or case against it. Now anyone that pays attention knows you just blather on and on without ever doing anything else.
Your opinion matters.By man and interpreted by man. Your interpretation is no more valid than anyone else's and probably far less valid.
Link the post.I have supported my flood claims countless times.
Your opinion matters.
Link the post.
Step up to the field of battle and face what comes.
I already have. You ran away. But once more let's discuss this picture and how it tells us that there was no worldwide flood of Noah:
Or we could discuss this video:
Or we could discuss this video:
Let's discuss what you see there. Can you see the meander?Great, so what in either do you find supports you in some way? Or is this a frankenstein look alike contest?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?