Oscarr, JohnM, heron, churchlady, (WHOEVER,)
I'm afraid you guys/gals missed my last point.
My experience 16 years ago had nothing whatsoever to do with the thread starter (I had not even remembered it until AngelEyes' post yesterday, and it is a testimony I post on divers forums from time to time, usually when discussing the WoF and attempting to teach WoFers that balance is needed in the WoF. (I am deeply indebted to the WoF for the many, many good and edifying things that I did manage to extract from it---all glory to God and Grace alone.) As always, sift, sift and sift, is the lesson; don't throw the baby out w/---
Please forgo the psychoanalysis, people. Thanks. This thread is not about personas.
The intended normal Christian life, is one where---I think someone mentioned it here before---"the world is crucified onto us, and us onto the world."
God's process of crucifying the world onto us, includes a never-ending-in-this-life series of "deaths," whether jobs, businesses, relationships, possessions. This is exactly what is required in the process of sanct./regen.---among whatever else. There are no shortcuts. Of course, today's post-modern church, by and large, staunchly disagrees that such sufferings are a requirement for---- (So now that I said it for many of you, pleaseeeeeee, I'm begging all, pleaseeeeeee do not turn this thread off track into a discussion of why the Christian does not have to suffer, if indeed that is what you believe rather than what I just stated. Thanks. This thread attempted to form a list of all litmus tests, and of course some will not be acceptable to certain ones. There are plenty of others. I got another one at 1 this morning, and had to get out of bed again at 3AM to write down yet another that came to mind. God is verrrrryyyy gracious.)
Last night I sat down and composed the sermon/outline I first set out to do, and which prompted the posting of this thread on this and a dozen other forums and forum channels. I came up with ten main items/ litmus tests.
One of the tests, which I based on AngelEyes post, is about our obedience as Christians to the commandment, "The just shall live by Faith." (Thanks again, Angel.) My post to her here was merely giving an example of how, although her point was valid and is indeed one of those things I was looking for, it cannot, by itself, be sufficient in indicating whether someone is in or still in the Faith, or not. But neither are any of the litmus tests, including the two I first mentioned here: ALL are necessary, for each one by itself can be deceiving.
As I believe I suggested here, someone on another channel, GraceAndMercy (??), offered up 2 Peter 1:5-11, which gives us two litmus tests, that of Fruits of the Spirit increasing in us, and the same regarding soulish fruits. I also suggested you guys search John's first epistle, as it too yields several litmus tests. But you guys/gals are so busy trying to figure out my motives, that you cannot see the forest for the trees. The thread is not about my motives, but about the thread starter.
So allow me to repeat and get the thread back on track. If you cannot control your thoughts and emotions to post intelligent, objective, edifying adjuncts to the list attempting to be composed by this thread, then get off and stay off, please. Stick to the thread starter, please. Thanks.
(Your words, JohnM, were very sweet and nice and godly and all that, but it was not from God. But the only way to correctly identify the Voice of God on a consistently reliable basis, is through years of practice, "by reason of use" [KJV]. There are no shortcuts, and we each and all must suffer the potential embarassments and whatever sufferings wrought, by learning from our mistakes---man best learns from error. There is a deep, deep need in the charismatic church, for itinerant teachers to spend a couple weeks with local congregations, teaching them how to discern the Voice of God, and also teaching how to speak and write prophetically. The lessons are also applicable to those desiring to some day play a musical instrument at Carnegie Hall. Post what you will feel you absolutely have to as a last word on the matter, John, to save face or whatever, and then drop it (or, preferably, say nothing more about it). Such has nothing to do with the thread, and you guys/gals are clogging it up with all sorts of nonsense. I understand you think you are helping; I understand you think you're doing God and me service; I understand you are convinced that God has you ministering here---)
So I sincerely appreciate all of your considerations. You could've just ignored the thread altogether, so I'm at least grateful for something more. But---
Back to the thread starter, people: how can someone (not me, not you, but anyone) know if they are in, or still in, the true Faith.
Sincerely, brother jim
"It is through much tribulation whereby we are enabled to enter the Kingdom of God." (Ampl./para.) --Acts
I'm afraid you guys/gals missed my last point.
My experience 16 years ago had nothing whatsoever to do with the thread starter (I had not even remembered it until AngelEyes' post yesterday, and it is a testimony I post on divers forums from time to time, usually when discussing the WoF and attempting to teach WoFers that balance is needed in the WoF. (I am deeply indebted to the WoF for the many, many good and edifying things that I did manage to extract from it---all glory to God and Grace alone.) As always, sift, sift and sift, is the lesson; don't throw the baby out w/---
Please forgo the psychoanalysis, people. Thanks. This thread is not about personas.
The intended normal Christian life, is one where---I think someone mentioned it here before---"the world is crucified onto us, and us onto the world."
God's process of crucifying the world onto us, includes a never-ending-in-this-life series of "deaths," whether jobs, businesses, relationships, possessions. This is exactly what is required in the process of sanct./regen.---among whatever else. There are no shortcuts. Of course, today's post-modern church, by and large, staunchly disagrees that such sufferings are a requirement for---- (So now that I said it for many of you, pleaseeeeeee, I'm begging all, pleaseeeeeee do not turn this thread off track into a discussion of why the Christian does not have to suffer, if indeed that is what you believe rather than what I just stated. Thanks. This thread attempted to form a list of all litmus tests, and of course some will not be acceptable to certain ones. There are plenty of others. I got another one at 1 this morning, and had to get out of bed again at 3AM to write down yet another that came to mind. God is verrrrryyyy gracious.)
Last night I sat down and composed the sermon/outline I first set out to do, and which prompted the posting of this thread on this and a dozen other forums and forum channels. I came up with ten main items/ litmus tests.
One of the tests, which I based on AngelEyes post, is about our obedience as Christians to the commandment, "The just shall live by Faith." (Thanks again, Angel.) My post to her here was merely giving an example of how, although her point was valid and is indeed one of those things I was looking for, it cannot, by itself, be sufficient in indicating whether someone is in or still in the Faith, or not. But neither are any of the litmus tests, including the two I first mentioned here: ALL are necessary, for each one by itself can be deceiving.
As I believe I suggested here, someone on another channel, GraceAndMercy (??), offered up 2 Peter 1:5-11, which gives us two litmus tests, that of Fruits of the Spirit increasing in us, and the same regarding soulish fruits. I also suggested you guys search John's first epistle, as it too yields several litmus tests. But you guys/gals are so busy trying to figure out my motives, that you cannot see the forest for the trees. The thread is not about my motives, but about the thread starter.
So allow me to repeat and get the thread back on track. If you cannot control your thoughts and emotions to post intelligent, objective, edifying adjuncts to the list attempting to be composed by this thread, then get off and stay off, please. Stick to the thread starter, please. Thanks.
(Your words, JohnM, were very sweet and nice and godly and all that, but it was not from God. But the only way to correctly identify the Voice of God on a consistently reliable basis, is through years of practice, "by reason of use" [KJV]. There are no shortcuts, and we each and all must suffer the potential embarassments and whatever sufferings wrought, by learning from our mistakes---man best learns from error. There is a deep, deep need in the charismatic church, for itinerant teachers to spend a couple weeks with local congregations, teaching them how to discern the Voice of God, and also teaching how to speak and write prophetically. The lessons are also applicable to those desiring to some day play a musical instrument at Carnegie Hall. Post what you will feel you absolutely have to as a last word on the matter, John, to save face or whatever, and then drop it (or, preferably, say nothing more about it). Such has nothing to do with the thread, and you guys/gals are clogging it up with all sorts of nonsense. I understand you think you are helping; I understand you think you're doing God and me service; I understand you are convinced that God has you ministering here---)
So I sincerely appreciate all of your considerations. You could've just ignored the thread altogether, so I'm at least grateful for something more. But---
Back to the thread starter, people: how can someone (not me, not you, but anyone) know if they are in, or still in, the true Faith.
Sincerely, brother jim
"It is through much tribulation whereby we are enabled to enter the Kingdom of God." (Ampl./para.) --Acts
Upvote
0