Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
King David died at 70 years old.I'm talking about this very specific generational timeline in Matthew 1:17 :
So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations, from David until the captivity in Babylon are fourteen generations, and from the captivity in Babylon until the Christ are fourteen generations.
Show us how 70 years = one generation in this passage please.
Should be simple math.
ok so we need to account for 27 more consecutive "70 year" generations from David to Christ.King David died at 70 years old.
A biblical Generation is 40 years.
Thus your conclusions as to what would happen a "generation" after 1967, are wrong.
Where does the Bible teach it would be thousands of years later?
Where does the Bible teach it would be thousands of years later?
Where does the Bible teach it would be thousands of years later?
Where does the Bible teach it would be thousands of years later?
So they took 1948 added 70 years for the length of a generation (Psalms 90) and came up with Jesus returning no later than 2018.
The problem arose because there are the 7 years of the 70th week that must precede Jesus's return - which would have meant 2011 as the no later than start of the 70th week.
Didn't happen. So that theory fizzled.
I don't think that it can be. Nothing happened in 2007. So it must be talking about something else. It's like the process of elimination.
Nothing happened in 2007, nothing happened in 1988.
therefore Jesus must've been speaking about the generation that was alive at the time HE SPOKE, and not some future generation, for within His 40 year generation, the temple (one of the things included in "all these things") fell, on time, as promised.
“Fall on us and hide us from the face of him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb! For the great day of their wrath has come, and who can withstand it?” ~Revelation 6:15-17
The nuclear bunkers designed for luxury living - BBC News
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jimdob...largest-planned-doomsday-escape/#145f0ece306f
Why Are So Many Among The Elite Building Luxury Bunkers In Preparation For An Imminent "Apocalypse"? | Zero Hedge
That's right! The major Blood moon tetrad of 2015 hasn't happened ye.... wait.But you can't say Nothing happened in 2018. Not yet.
Agreed... sort of...
Luke 21's "days of vengeance" was the DofJ. Luke 21 was split into thirds starting after: "But before all this".Luke 21 and Matthew 24 are too tricky to get into here
Dave, as time moves forward the picture is going to become more in focus. Right now I am looking at the EU and a ten leader form of government, some change to what it is now. Once we get that, everything gets confirmed at that point because the little horn will be leader over those ten leaders. Everything is triggered then. We want be arguing over the parable of the fig tree any more at that point.Based on the magnitude of the Event that we're talking about, I'd be keeping my options open.
I am not understanding your rationale because no matter how you come up with 40 years - all those combinations of base years plus 40 years have fizzled out.ok so we need to account for 27 more consecutive "70 year" generations from David to Christ.
David Became King of Israel in 1002 BC, 1000 years before Christ.
1000/28= 35.714 years per generation
Even if we stretch it From king Davids Birth (1030BC) to the Anointing of Christ (26AD),
28 Generations = 37.678 years per generation
For your 70 year generation position to be correct, Christ would have had to come on the scene no earlier than 960AD, for 28 "70 year generations" from David to Christ, take us from 1000 BC to 960 AD.
A biblical Generation is 40 years.
Thus your conclusions as to what would happen a "generation" after 1967, are wrong.
I am not understanding your rationale because no matter how you come up with 40 years - all those combinations of base years plus 40 years have fizzled out.
1948+40 = 1988 fizzle
1967+40 = 2007 fizzle
The only combination left is 1967+70= 2037.
I am sure that when the EU got its 10 th country member in 1981 you believed that it was the fulfillment of what you were looking for....as time moves forward the picture is going to become more in focus. Right now I am looking at the EU and a ten leader form of government, some change to what it is now. Once we get that, everything gets confirmed at that point because the little horn will be leader over those ten leaders. Everything is triggered then. We want be arguing over the parable of the fig tree any more at that point.
No, I would not say 10 countries. Although it could turn out that way. It is only necessary to be ten leaders over the EU as a group, and one leader over them Right now we just cannot forsee what it is going to look like specifically and what that body of leaders are going to be called..You totally miss the boat with the EU 10 Countries ....
The New World Order will be implemented after WW3 and economic crash :No, I would not say 10 countries. Although it could turn out that way. It is only necessary to be ten leaders over the EU as a group, and one leader over them Right now we just cannot forsee what it is going to look like specifically and what that body of leaders are going to be called..
I would not call it a third world war, but Gog/Magog. Which God does the judgment.Since the terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001, world events, and in particular in the Middle East, show a growing unrest and instability between Modern Zionism and the Arabic World. This is completely in line with the call for a Third World War to be fought between the two, and their allies on both sides. This Third World War is still to come, and recent events show us that it is not far off.
Well, you probably don't remember what you wrote in post 238...
"And you have not identified why your interpretation is right while others were wrong. In fact others in this thread have pointed out that there are flwas in what you are saying."
So I ask for the specifics of each failed interpretation to identify specifically why they were wrong. Which you are declining to give.
Now you are going back to no-one knows the day nor hour.
Which again, the bible doesn't instruct us to pinpoint the day nor the hour, but to learn the parable of the fig tree.
So what is your interpretation of the fig tree and the length of a generation?
Which I don't think you want to learn the parable of the fig tree, but just sit back and criticize without actually making a tangible biblical argument.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?