G
gattaca
Guest
Rarely have I seen so much ignorance in one post.
but why not just set the age of consent to 21?
Upvote
0
Rarely have I seen so much ignorance in one post.
But why do that when, quite obviously, kids younger than 18 are having sex?but why not just set the age of consent to 21?
but why not just set the age of consent to 21?
True...think drug laws. So much legislation.Hetta said:But why do that when, quite obviously, kids younger than 18 are having sex? And how would you enforce that age limit when the current age limit is not enforced? Better to educate kids and equip them for adult life than create yet more pointless legislation.
Did you seriously just perform thread necromancy on your own thread with the same question that you asked three times in a row in the original post?but why not just set the age of consent to 21?
But why do that when, quite obviously, kids younger than 18 are having sex?
And how would you enforce that age limit when the current age limit is not enforced?
but why not just set the age of consent to 21?
Because more than 90% of people will obey laws, that why.
and that is why we should just set the age of consent to 21.
Because more than 90% of people will obey laws, that why.
Should the age of consent be set at 21 to help reduce the world population?
Should the age of consent be set at 21 to help reduce the world population?
Should the international age of consent be set at 21 to help reduce the world population?
In third world countries such as Africa and in England,
teen age pregnancy rates are extremely high and
most of these girls end up living on hand outs and welfare their whole life.
So isnt it time the international age of consent be set at 21 all over the whole world
to help reduce the world population?
Should the age of consent be set at 21 to help reduce the world population?
Should the age of consent be set at 21 to help reduce the world population?
Should the international age of consent be set at 21 to help reduce the world population?
In third world countries such as Africa and in England,
teen age pregnancy rates are extremely high and
most of these girls end up living on hand outs and welfare their whole life.
So isnt it time the international age of consent be set at 21 all over the whole world
to help reduce the world population?
But why have laws against murder, when, quite obviously, people are murdering one another?
And how would you enforce that laws against murder when the current laws against murder are not stopping murder?
Why should we have any laws at all, when, quite obviously, some people will break laws?
Why should we have laws against under age sex?
Because more than 90% of people will obey laws, that why.
and that is why we should just set the age of consent to 21.
Because more than 90% of people will obey laws, that why.
Wait... what was the question?Should the age of consent be set at 21 to help reduce the world population?
Should the age of consent be set at 21 to help reduce the world population?
Should the international age of consent be set at 21 to help reduce the world population?