Should Christians vote?

NightEternal

Evangelical SDA
Apr 18, 2007
5,639
125
Toronto, Ontario
✟6,539.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
In the US 2004 election bot Bush and Kerry was members of the same secret society. They both belong to Skull and Bones. Tony Blair, ex-PM of Britian is a 33rd freemason. The queen of the UK owns the Bilderbergers. And they are all controlled by Rome through the Jesuits.

Wow, those Jesuits really get around, don't they? I wonder how they get the time to infiltrate the GC and consult with Sam Bacchiocchi if they are also busy manipulating and controlling the political process? On lunch breaks perhaps? Maybe they work in shifts....

I have sat through all of Walter Veith's presentations at camp meeting and I also own his Total Onslaught DVD series. I've heard it all before, it is nothing new to me.

That doesn't mean I am going to swallow everything Veith says hook, line and sinker.

Isn't there wise counsel that says never discuss religion or politics? We just ask for trouble here, don't we? :D
 
Upvote 0

daro2096

Active Member
Aug 29, 2007
253
2
UK
✟7,914.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
So nobody believes the Roman Catholic Church is behind the scenes ruling this world through secret societies through the Jesuits?

That is what wilderness in Revelation chapter 17 means. It means in secret, compare with the woman in Revelation chapter 12 that flees into the wilderness, she went into secret, underground during the 1260 years.
 
Upvote 0

sentipente

Senior Contributor
Jul 17, 2007
11,651
4,492
Silver Sprint, MD
✟46,642.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Politics
US-Others
So nobody believes the Roman Catholic Church is behind the scenes ruling this world through secret societies through the Jesuits?
They couldn't stop a few dioceses from going bankrupt but they are controlling geo-political forces. Interesting.
 
Upvote 0

daro2096

Active Member
Aug 29, 2007
253
2
UK
✟7,914.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
This is serious and all you can do is joke about it?

Ellen White echoed Paul’s counsel in 2 Corinthians 6 when she warned against secret fraternities or societies (like the Masons) where Christian principles are compromised because of one’s total loyalty to the organization. (See Selected Messages, book 2, pp. 121-139.) The same principle would apply regarding membership by Christians in any kind of organization that demands total loyalty. It is absolutely impossible to be totally committed to Christ while at the same time being totally involved with any worldly organization.
 
Upvote 0

NightEternal

Evangelical SDA
Apr 18, 2007
5,639
125
Toronto, Ontario
✟6,539.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
I have borne witness to the fruit of both Marcussen and Veith's ministries over and over and over and over again. More often than not, they produce isolated, basket-case paranoiac Adventists, living life in terror, seeing Jesuits behind every bush.

If that is what you want for your Christian experience, fine. I will not be sucked into such a mindset.

Malachi Martin said on more than one occasion that SDA's are an insignificant sect, a non-entity to the RCC, and that only applies to the Catholics who even know who we are and that we exist. We stroke our pride and like to believe we matter that much to them, but the idea that our church even registers as a blip on the radar screen of a such a huge religio/political entity such as the RCC is laughable.

I speak as a former Catholic BTW.
 
Upvote 0

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,118
475
✟454,215.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You beat me to it daro2096...

Why God & Politics do not mix, or the Seperation of Church and State...

The two are on different planes and this was made clear when Jesus said "'Render unto Ceaser that which is Ceasar's, render unto God that which is God's". Even Jesus knew that some things are earthly and secular and some are spiritual. He knew they were separate and Christians needed to do their duty first to God, but also to the government. He never condemned anyone for working for the government such as tax collectors like Mattew or Zacheous, but did condemn the sinners and hypocrites like the Pharisees. Christians need to be mindful not to condemn others for working in the goverment or government leaders, but to condemn sin itself.



Some feel that Christians have to seperate church and state and stay only in religion and not lower themselves and the gospel of Christ by engaging in partisan politics, while others such as James Dobson and Pat Robertson feel Christ handled both sides but still kept them apart.

"What does the bible say? Or does it even speak on the matter at all? Possibly the most pertinent scripture on the subject is in Matthew 22:15-22. In it, we find biblical answers to these questions.


Matthew 22:15-22

15 Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might entangle him in his talk.
16 And they sent out unto him their disciples with the Herodians, saying, Master, we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth, neither carest thou for any man: for thou regardest not the person of men.
17 Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not?
18 But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites?
19 Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny.
20 And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription?
21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.
22 When they had heard these words, they marvelled, and left him, and went their way.

In verse 15 we see the two major political parties of Israel introduced. The Pharisees were the religious leaders who used the political system to their advantage. They were nationalists, believing that the Roman occupation of Israel was unacceptable. The Herodians were their opposition. They were the liberals of the time, compromising with the Roman government for their own political gain.

An amazing fact is that Jesus was such a threat to the political system of His day that both major political parties conspired together to stop Him. The word translated entangle means "to snare as trapping a bird." The political experts decided to play political games with the Son of God.


Notice how the political experts handled Christ. They used the old political trick of flattery. But in their attempt to flatter Him, they actually pay Him great homage. They call Him Master, a term denoting His authority as a teacher. In saying thou art true , they mean that He is a lover of the truth. In teaching the way of God in truth, they judge that He is an objective teacher, one who does not play favorites. They also praise His objectiveness with people, not preferring one over the other. The disciples of the Pharisees and the Herodians think that they have Christ in a political quandary, so they lavish Him with compliments, trying to build up to the defining moment when they present the poisonous question.


It is almost humorous to examine the question presented to Christ in light of present day politics. In verse 17, we have the political experts' opinion poll. "Tell us therefore, what thinkest thou?" As in the opinion polls, you get the choice of two answers. Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not? This was their "poison pill" question. Politically, there was no way to answer. If He rejected the paying of taxes to the Roman government, He would be considered a seditionist and a rebel. He could be arrested. If He advocated payment, He risked alienating His largest group of supporters, the common people who hated being under the rule of Rome.
It was just the type of political quicksand in which politicians love to get their opponents mired. The questioners thought they "had" Jesus, but they had sadly underestimated Him. He was "up to" the challenge.

Verse 18 says that Jesus "perceived their wickedness." Wickedness here refers to "evil purposes." These challengers of Christ were political power-players. They knew the game and how to play it. Their purpose was not to be taught or edified by Christ, but to destroy Him if they could. They resented the hold He had on the people. They were losing their grip on their power. Jesus' question to them let them know that He could see through their sham. "Why tempt ye me..." Why do you use craft and cunning to test me, He is saying. Then He labels them "hypocrites." Pretenders! Stage actors! Jesus certainly did not use political correctness in dealing with the politicians, He exposed them!

Jesus asked them for the coin. In doing this, He placed the entire political process on display. The coin represented the government of Rome; it was backed by the Roman empire. It was the currency of their culture. He then asks them whose image is embedded on the coin. In doing this, He placed the political leaders on display. Caesar represented the supreme political power of the day.

Notice too that Jesus made His challengers produce the coin. This placed Him above and beyond the controversy. The coin did not come from the pockets of Christ, but from the questioners themselves. Let us always remember that our faith is never subject to the political whims of the day. Our salvation is always "above and beyond" the political process.

Now we come to the great teaching that has amazed the teachers and scholars to this day. To "render" means "to pay or to deliver." We are to deliver allegiance and obedience to our government. We are obligated to fulfill our duties to the state, such as paying taxes, voting, serving on juries, etc. I believe that we are "rendering unto Caesar" when we honor the flag and show patriotism.

But that is not the entire teaching. The word "and" which connects the two parts of the sentence is "a primary article, giving force to the words preceding and proceeding it." Christ is saying that there is benefit in respecting and honoring your government, but not at the expense of "rendering unto God." The two causes are separate causes, and there is no question which is to be the most important to the Christian.

We are to "render unto God the things that are God's." Our supreme duty and passion is to give glory and honor to the God of our salvation. There can be no compromise, no debate, and no discussion. By His statement, Christ forever separates faith and politics, and at the same time, links the two together. The state can never overtake the principles of our faith, but our faith must always be our guide in our political and governmental dealings. If there is a division, God must take preeminence. When the disciples in the book of Acts were commanded by the magistrates not to preach anymore in Jesus' name, they said, "We ought to obey God rather than man."

When the questioners heard the words of Christ, they marveled. That is, they wondered in admiration. They had been defeated in their designs. They were silenced and confounded and they went their way. Christ had upheld the principles of Christianity when confronted by the political apparatus of the day. Christianity is not for sale or compromise in the political arena. Believers are not to negotiate away our standards and principles....excerpts from 'The Place of Politics in Modern Christianity '
http://www.newsforchristians.com/







So can a Christian enter the political arena or work for government? We cannot "check in our religion at the door" as we enter the political process. We must be allowed to stand for the principles that make us who we are. But those who would exclude Christians from the political process on the basis of separation of church and state do so with no authority from scripture or the words of Christ.

But, Christians should never expect to further the cause of Christ through the political process. We do not have a divine mandate to use politics in the work of God. The Christian heritage we reverence in our nation is not a product of our government. It rests in God's people and our individual testimonies. God is our refuge and our help, not a flawed government with flawed leaders.

Christians can use the political process, but we should never allow politics and politicians to use us."
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

StormyOne

Senior Veteran
Aug 21, 2005
5,424
47
63
Alabama
✟5,866.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So nobody believes the Roman Catholic Church is behind the scenes ruling this world through secret societies through the Jesuits?

That is what wilderness in Revelation chapter 17 means. It means in secret, compare with the woman in Revelation chapter 12 that flees into the wilderness, she went into secret, underground during the 1260 years.
ummmm no, and ummm no... your interpretation is suspect... your paranoia is overactive... but, if that is what you believe that's cool.... oh by the way, did you happen to notice who owns and runs this forum? Does that make you nervous?
 
Upvote 0

Telaquapacky

Unconquerable Good Will
Sep 5, 2006
457
20
Central California
✟8,170.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Here goes! (pinches nose and jumps in)

George Bush has unwittingly (he did not do this for a Sunday Law, but for other reasons) done more to facilitate the eventuality of a Sunday Law than any other president, by filling out with two more Conservative Roman Catholics (Alito and Roberts), a Supreme Court already packed with Conservative Roman Catholics, some openly hostile to separation of church and state.
 
Upvote 0

daro2096

Active Member
Aug 29, 2007
253
2
UK
✟7,914.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
ummmm no, and ummm no... your interpretation is suspect... your paranoia is overactive... but, if that is what you believe that's cool.... oh by the way, did you happen to notice who owns and runs this forum? Does that make you nervous?
No, who does own and run this forum?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Telaquapacky

Unconquerable Good Will
Sep 5, 2006
457
20
Central California
✟8,170.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Here goes! (pinches nose and jumps in)

George Bush has unwittingly (he did not do this for a Sunday Law, but for other reasons) done more to facilitate the eventuality of a Sunday Law than any other president, by filling out with two more Conservative Roman Catholics (Alito and Roberts), a Supreme Court already packed with Conservative Roman Catholics, some openly hostile to separation of church and state.
I read in Wall Street Journal years ago, before Bush was re-elected, that if re-elected, he anticipated that there would be some Supreme Court vacancies, and he intended to fill them with "Scalia type" justices. He had a great amount of respect for Scalia, a Conservative Roman Catholic, who has been very activist against separation of church and state.

I have an interesting quotation from Scalia's essay, entitled "Desired, but not Required," in which he explains how religious liberty while certainly a nicety, is not upheld by the Constitution (as he interprets it). Here below, Scalia tells how he derived his opinion on how the Framers of the Constitution understood the subject, by, selected precedents set by colonial and early American courts. Scalia thought he was being generous by giving the separationists some thin allowance in a New York State Court ruling that excused a Roman Catholic priest from testifying against a murderer who had confessed to the priest. However, see what Scalia chose as the deciding precedent on religious freedom- two cases where the religious liberty of Sabbath-keepers was denied:

The closest one can come in the period prior to 1850 is the decision of a New York City municipal court in 1813, holding that the New York Constitution of 1777 required acknowledgment of a priest-penitent privilege to protect a Catholic priest from being compelled to testify as to the contents of a confession. Even this lone case is weak authority, not only because it comes from a minor court but also because it did not involve a statute, and the same result might possibly have been achieved (without invoking constitutional entitlement) by the court's simply modifying the common-law rules of evidence to recognize such a privilege.

On the other side of the ledger, moreover, there are two cases from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania flatly rejecting the dissent's view. In Simon's Executors v. Gratz, the court held that a litigant was not entitled to a continuance of trial on the ground that appearing on his Sabbath would violate his religious principles. And in Stansbury v. Marks, decided just two years after the ratification of the Bill of Rights, the court imposed a fine on a witness who "refused to be sworn because it was his Sabbath."


Source: http://www.libertymagazine.org/article/articleview/79/

Scalia bases his anti-separation of church and state on the precedents set by rulings against early American Sabbatarians. He is the ideologically most forceful and influential member of the Supreme Court, appointed by Reagan, and idealized by Bush in all his large number of federal judiciary appointments. How does that make you feel?

Now don't nobody say I said Bush is conspiring to bring in the Sunday Law- 'cause that's not what I'm saying. Bush loves Scalia because he is an arch-conservative- it's all political and ideological- nothing to do with his views on Sabbath and Sunday. But indirectly, Bush's choice of "Scalia-like" justices, Roberts and Alito (nicknamed "Scalito-" little Scalia) and his many other lower court appointments (and probably the firings when they did not turn out to be as ideologically pure as the Bushies wanted- so much for an independent judiciary, which is why there's an investigation) moves us more in the Sunday Law direction.
 
Upvote 0

Telaquapacky

Unconquerable Good Will
Sep 5, 2006
457
20
Central California
✟8,170.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
the "Sunday Law" is a distraction... a diversion... keep looking there and you will miss what is really happening....
My point was that some Adventists voted for Bush, against Kerry, because Kerry was a Roman Catholic, and they thought Bush would be less a hazard for Sunday Law. They were wrong. People vote like they were picking out a brand of toothpaste. They don't look at how our system works and who the players are. Even that some of the Supremes are RC isn't the point. It's their stance on religious freedom.

Actually the reason most American Adventists voted for Bush is because most Adventists in the U.S. are Republican. Again, they don't know how the system works, who the players are, and how voting Republican has been undermining separation of church and state, probably the most important political issue to prophetically savvy Seventh-day Adventists.

We'll know just how "distraction/diversion" the Sunday Law is if and when it happens. I agree with you, Stormy, it's not on the front burner right now, although if you ask Religious Liberty Department they would tell you that is no reason to be less vigilant. Religious liberties have been steadily and dangerously eroding for years now, under a succession of Republican administrations. Sandra Day O'Connor said about four years ago that they were "hanging by a thread."

Stormy, I agree that there are other things on the front burner- especially this "War on Terror." What do you think is top drawer stuff?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,118
475
✟454,215.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
the "Sunday Law" is a distraction... a diversion... keep looking there and you will miss what is really happening....

AMEN!

Too many Adventist are sitting on their hands waiting for the "Sunday Law" so they can start to get ready. The Sunday law will be at the very end so it will be too late for that, and most likely it will be with Satan walking around as a 'false christ' and going to Jerusalem presenting himself as the real deal to all the religions waiting on a divine being to save them. Then he will 'request' they all worship on 'his day' which goes all the way to Baal and his pagan day of Sunday...
 
Upvote 0