Because of the crisis in recruiting Catholic men to the priesthood, the archbishop has taken the very unpopular move of closing some churches.
The reason for the shortage in vocations is because of the NLM and theological liberalism. There is no shortage of vocations for the Traditional Latin Mass. For example, the FSSP, which is one of only two groups I am aware of that are canonically regular (the SSPX is in a complex situation of canonical irregularity, with some people saying it is schismatic, but others saying it is merely canonically irregular), the current number of seminarians is equal to 50% of the serving clergy! Which is a very good number. The other group, the Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest, is doing even better in terms of vocations, with 147 priests and 108 seminarians. In contrast, if we look at the Roman Catholic Church worldwide, the ratio of ordained priests to seminarians is 4:1, and if we focus on North America, this drops to 7:1, and in Europe, it drops to a dire 11:1, while in Australia and New Zealand, the ratio is a catastrophic 14:1, meaning mass parish closures outside of the TLM community are inevitable due to the priest shortage, unless the RCC can do something to stabilize the situation. And I can think of things they could do, but I doubt Pope Francis would do any of them. One major problem is the Roman Rite’s requirement of priestly celibacy, which becomes an unappealing prospect outside of the TLM communities, since one really does not want to be an unmarried male outside of the TLM communities which make a strong effort to ensure that homosexuals are not admitted to the vocation; also the TLM communities by their very nature tend to attract heterosexual men who are willing to be celibate, and furthermore, the high birthrate among TLM families compared to Catholics overall reduces the pressure to reproduce. Single children, who have no brothers, sisters, nieces and nephews to love them, are faced with isolation, and for a great many of them, reproduction is the best solution to this problem, since if one has children and raises them in a loving manner, the chances are that one will not be left alone, particularly in the environment of traditional Catholics where divorce is a strong taboo. Whereas in our modern secular society, divorce is rampant, because people think it is alright to divorce simply because their marriage is going through a slump, even if there has been no domestic violence or adultery. It’s a bit reminiscent of Islam where men can freely divorce any wives they get bored with (if I recall, the reverse is theoretically the case, but is inadvisable in countries like Afghanistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia).
If Pope Francis were to reverse course on
Traditiones Custodes and
Fiducia Supplicans, he would see more vocations and less membership loss. The adverse impact of
Fiducia Supplicans cannot be overstated - it represents the start of the terminal decline phase which the mainline Protestant churches are already experiencing, which is leaving them as burnt out husks of their former selves, with many denominations having lost more than half of their membership.
Now, I am well aware of your preference for low church Protestantism, but at the same time, I’d like you to consider the immense unpleasantness that the demonstrable increase in liberalism are causing for Catholics, even where the bishop himself might not be a liberal (although if he is closing parishes, he might well be liberal, since the more traditional bishops, like the Traditional Latin Mass communities, tend to be able to get more vocations in their diocese).
By the way, how do you know that your local Greek Orthodox church is only going after the Germans? This seems quite a claim. While it is true that crypto-ethnophyletism exists in the Roman Catholic Church, ethnophyletism is condemned as a heresy in the Orthodox Church. The problem of ethnocentric Orthodox churches does exist in GoArch, admittedly, but among those GoArch churches that are actively evangelizing, I have seen no trace of it.
At any rate, the problem with saying that the GoArch church is only going after Germans is this: if an Irish Catholic wanted to join that parish, and the clergy refused to receive them for fear it would torpedo their efforts to convert the Germans, that would be a violation of canon law and would result in the clergy being anathematized for teaching a false Gospel in contradiction to the one handed down from the Apostles in accordance with Galatians 1:8-9.
And also, I can think of no practical way of soliciting German American converts without soliciting Irish Americans also. I mean, its not like you could post German or Gaelic messages on the billboard. Indeed, even neo-Nazis do not generally exclude the Irish (although some of them do exclude Irish Catholics) so the presence of a swastika, which I doubt any billboard owner would permit, would not deter the Nazis. Also, St. Patrick is actively venerated in the Orthodox Church and is much more widely known and venerated than St. Boniface, although St. Boniface is venerated, to be sure, but we have no parishes named for him, whereas we do have one of the larger Western Rite parishes named for St. Patrick and another named for Pope St. Gregory I Diologos. Rather the problem is that St. Boniface is simply obscure, as is St. Willibrord the Patron Saint of Luxembourg. Unfortunately, because they were born after the Great Schism in 1054, St. Leopold III the Patron Saint of Austria,St. Nicholas of Flüe, the Patron Saint of Switzerland and St. Florinus the Patron Saint of Liechtenstein are not venerated, although like St. Brigitta of Sweden, I hope they will be at some point in the future.
The net result of this has is that two of the five national patron saints of countries where German or a dialect thereof is the predominant native tongue are not well known and the other three were only canonized, or as we would say, glorified, after the Great Schism of 1054, which means they are not yet venerated by the majority of the Orthodox or included in the offical synaxaria, such as the
Prologue of Ohrid. Now, Belgium has a German speaking minority that is the third largest ethnolinguistic group in the country and the majority of the population in the East Cantons of Wallonia (which are semi-autonomous and have their own regional parliament and flag), and the patron saint of Belgium is St. Joseph, but this is not well known among German Americans, particularly since Belgium only acquired this territory in World War I. And of course after World War II captured Germans were taken to the Soviet Union and Kazakhstan where some remain even today, such as Bishop Athanasius Schneider in Kazakhstan, who I greatly admire for his traditional theology and family values, and these countries obviously have Orthodox patron saints, but alas, putting St. Vladimir the Great on a billboard is unlikely to attract German Americans to a Greek Orthodox parish.
Indeed, the result of doing that would I think cause quite a bit of confusion - if you have a ROCOR or OCA parish in your town, or a UOCNA parish, the Russians and Ukrainians (all three churches have Ukrainians, and some dissident Russians have joined Ukrainian parishes) would be confused as to why St. Vladimir was being used in advertisements for a Greek Orthodox parish, when St. Nicholas of Myra is the patron saint of Greece.