I wasn't aware that the "Christian Right" was the largest and strongest part of the Right side of the political spectrum. But I appreciate you giving us all that power!
I will go with that analysis--somewhat--when the president speaks in similar terms of the hundreds of politicians and celebrities who started it and who "spew vile" (or is that supposed to be "bile?") at him.
Or come anywhere close to it.
Considering what you've done with it, there's nothing left to appreciate.
But this decorated soldier is a white man. Doesn't that help a little?
Donald is in power. So long as he throws your side the occasional shiny bauble, you will sing his praises.Well, we're still in power and your side is failing to oust Trump. I certainly appreciate that.
Oh look, a weird, off-topic attempt at insulting a group!
Donald is in power. So long as he throws your side the occasional shiny bauble, you will sing his praises.
What would you have without him?
I don't understand. Doesn't that help what a little?
It helps make any criticism of him a little easier. If he were black, we'd be hearing how a racist comment was made. If he were a woman, then a woman was being ATTACKED! And so it goes for all the other groups that are protected from being criticized, even when in the public spotlight where they put themselves.
Yet, oddly enough, you still manage to criticize them. You keep trying to claim some odd restriction instead of trying to debate the topic.
Donald is in power. So long as he throws your side the occasional shiny bauble, you will sing his praises.
What would you have without him?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...imsily-impugns-key-impeachment-witness-again/
Sen. Marsha Blackburn is taking a page from Donald John's book - defamatory tweets against Col. Vindman (who testified against Donald) to whom she has taken to referring, Donald-like, as "Vindictive Vindman".
Slander, defamation and name-calling have been winning strategies for Donald - why not for Blackburn?
I tried finding out what his testimony was...but I just keep getting articles about these tweets.
What was the general nature of his testimony? Did he hear the phone call and testify about it?
Blackburn is an embarrassment. Report me, but it’s true.https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...imsily-impugns-key-impeachment-witness-again/
Sen. Marsha Blackburn is taking a page from Donald John's book - defamatory tweets against Col. Vindman (who testified against Donald) to whom she has taken to referring, Donald-like, as "Vindictive Vindman".
Slander, defamation and name-calling have been winning strategies for Donald - why not for Blackburn?
I'm so happy that you're on the side that rules this world.
You mean that he's a purple heart recipient? Is that another protected class? What's the purpose in bringing up some aspect of a person's life in cases like this if not to use it as a way of attempting to either elevate them to a point beyond the criticism they received, or to lower them down to a victim in order to label the critic as some sort of bully?
Col. Vindman sat in on the infamous July 25th phone call.I tried finding out what his testimony was...but I just keep getting articles about these tweets.
What was the general nature of his testimony? Did he hear the phone call and testify about it?
Col. Vindman sat in on the infamous July 25th phone call.
Summary and transcript: READ: Testimony Of Alexander Vindman, The White House's Ukraine Specialist
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?