SCOTUS, Suspends the Constitution

[ralliann]

The point is that the remain in Mexico policy didn't stop the flow of illegal immigrants across the border.

Yes it did. What is happening now is ridiculous. Joe wouldn't redo the deal with Mexico.

 

[childeye 2]

Yes it did. What is happening now is ridiculous. Joe wouldn't redo the deal with Mexico.

Respectfully, the numbers don't lie. The policy was implemented in January of 2019. As shown below the flow didn't stop, it increased even though remain in Mexico was the policy.

 

[Truth7t7]

The Constitution places all responsibility of securing our national borders on the Federal Government. The SC ruled against this by a margin of 5-to-4, saying "that Texas is not permitted to protect itself from illegal border crossers. None of the justices provided any explanation for their vote."

"BUT the way that the Fed. Gov. is choosing to secure the border appears to be a violation of Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution.

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion;..."

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.

Looks like Justices Barrett and Robert's sold out, I don't get Justice Barrett siding with the liberals, Robert's yes?

 

[rocknanchor]

Absolutely! Not good at all! Do we fault the supremes when disruption to the COC (chain of command) has risen its ugly head, to persuade one of the bearers of truth to leave that post and reverse common sense? Look at her alma mater while today a remnant in the student body rise up to push back against it's pro-drag show faculty president, Jenkins which is thankfully stepping down. Or, looking back to one of the last bulwarks of law professors left there about 25yrs ago. I don't remember his name but certainly before Justice ACB time.

That among other influences has left the image of ND's leadership to tip-toe an ambiguous path, til the student body protest, or the birth of resistance clubs are about the only thing to honor its heritage. Though Justice Barrett confirmation was opposed to the bench by all Dems and one Repub, I would be NO safer faulting the President's review of her bench and mentoring past. I would be safer faulting the direction the SC has exhibited.

Threats, Intimidation? All we have to go on is performance, and by what I can tell, the cases that the SC hear and intensely important ones they don't, I think the SC is on slippery ground trying to avoid it becoming a slope of irrelevancy.

Interruptions? In light of recent times despicable revelations (election interference, J-6 captives, pro/con 2A police precincts, pro/con woke insistence), and anything else that have served the country reason to divide still comes down to a responsibility of our own. The blessing we lack is told in the fruits we have handed the world.

“For it is time for judgment to begin with the household of God, , with us first, ,” (1 Peter 4:17)​

 

[Brihaha]

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.

Looks like Justices Barrett and Robert's sold out, I don't get Justice Barrett siding with the liberals, Robert's yes?

They do and should rule based on their understanding of laws, not parties or tribes. We don't want courts to be partisan or justice is an afterthought.

 

[Valletta]

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.

Looks like Justices Barrett and Robert's sold out, I don't get Justice Barrett siding with the liberals, Robert's yes?

It's a temporary decision, understandable in that the federal government has been in charge of the border. I think upon examining it the decision will flip.

 

[rocknanchor]

The blessing we lack is told in the fruits we have handed the world.

“For it is time for judgment to begin with the household of God, , with us first, ,” (1 Peter 4:17)

Seems universally accepted as, poor judgement on my part. Yet, I just saw it voiced this morn, those who considers border crossers as "lawful immigration" and not an invasion because it ",does not represent my Christian values. I do not support these practices that lead to the deaths of people in desperate situations" the division that has ravaged the Church. It doesn't work that way. If I'm not mistaken, we are expected to resolve matters towards unity.

Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life? (1 Corinthians 6:3)​

Federal law/military enforcement was granted by the lawgiver. What happened to remove the lawgiver's lawful constraint? I would be at a loss for saying the Church has not been behind the promotion to invigorate isolation amongst its own to diminish our consent.

 

[Tuur]

They do and should rule based on their understanding of laws, not parties or tribes. We don't want courts to be partisan or justice is an afterthought.

Roosevelt did. So do the ones that want to pack the court now just like he wanted to. Truth be told, most people want a court that's on the same partisan side they're on.

 

[Brihaha]

Roosevelt did. So do the ones that want to pack the court now just like he wanted to. Truth be told, most people want a court that's on the same partisan side they're on.

Most people do not work for my Lord.
Maybe it's just a coincidence.

 

[Truth7t7]

It's a temporary decision, understandable in that the federal government has been in charge of the border. I think upon examining it the decision will flip.

My understanding is The bobwire fence is on Texas State property, and the Biden admin wants to enter this State property and remove their fencing?

 

[rocknanchor]

As it is in the world, so it is within gov't, there are many many upright, honorable people on the dole, some, willing to blow the lid on their corrupt colleagues while they justify another common 'practice'. No branch is immune and no other time in our history has evil infiltrated to this extreme.

Decisions made is what got us here. Stonewalling is the tool to stop corrections. Any guess what George would have done in his Continental Army had he found a fraction of these acts going on? That's right Commanders were held to the same standards as the militia. Death. But we have disagreed with the Apostle to the point of making his words a vanity. That vanity is now theology in the hands of a desperate, insane tyrant.

 

[Arcangl86]

My understanding is The bobwire fence is on Texas State property, and the Biden admin wants to enter this State property and remove their fencing?

The barbwire fence is on state property, but it is preventing the federal government from accessing the border.

 

[Valletta]

My understanding is The bobwire fence is on Texas State property, and the Biden admin wants to enter this State property and remove their fencing?

I've heard it described different ways. All the court has said so far is:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012224zr_fd9g.pdf

 

[Truth7t7]

The barbwire fence is on state property, but it is preventing the federal government from accessing the border.

I disagree, no place is Texas obligated to create access to the border for the feds, thats like believing the feds have a right to private property on the border also for access, private property owners aren't obligated either

Good thing is the border patrol stands with Governor Abbott 100%

If the feds want access to the border Biden can get a helicopter or a canoe with paddles for the Rio Grande, smiles

 

[Arcangl86]

I disagree, no place is Texas obligated to create access to the border for the feds, thats like believing the feds have a right to private property on the border also for access, private property owners aren't obligated either

Actually, they are. The federal government needs to have access to the border and intentionally trying to prevent it is obstruction.

Good thing is the border patrol stands with Governor Abbott 100%

If the feds want access to the border Biden can get a helicopter or a canoe with paddles for the Rio Grande, smiles

The park that Texas is blocking access to has the boat ramp that CBP uses to patrol that portion of the Rio Grande. It'll be one thing if Texas was simply enforcing immigration law, thought that would still be illegal in my understanding, but they are actively preventing the federal government from doing so.

 

[rocknanchor]

Is it beginning to set in? Does the non-politically minded citizen now know, we are witnessing the conclusion of a force known never to abandon reverence and preservation of federal and US constitutional law? Today, there are so many isolated and visible totalitarian brushfires, court clerks won’t be able to keep up with the subpoena process for every offense. But that’s OK with EVERYONE who loathes lawful immigration and joyfully conducts operations that undermine that process, including those who think they are doing the Lord a service.

“Therefore, submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord’s sake” (1 Peter 2:13)

 

[The Barbarian]

Honestly, if this doesn't stop I see Texas seceding from the union.

Except for DFW, Houston, San Antonio, Austin, and El Paso, and counties immediately adjoining them.

But Texas could keep Lubbock, Tyler, Odessa, and Arp.

 

[The Barbarian]

Those that got away (unknowns). Up to three or four sectors have been without anyone there due to overwhelming the border patrol for the numbers. This is by design of the drug cartels, to freely carry out trafficking

This is why Trump and the republicans are fighting Biden's request for more funding for the Border Patrol. As usual, it's all about money.

 

[The Barbarian]

But that’s OK with EVERYONE who loathes lawful immigration and joyfully conducts operations that undermine that process, including those who think they are doing the Lord a service.

I don't think that the republicans object to legal immigration. Their reluctance to fund border security is based on contributions they get to look the other way on illegal immigration.

 

[ralliann]

This is why Trump and the republicans are fighting Biden's request for more funding for the Border Patrol. As usual, it's all about money.

No, republicans want the border closed. Dems want to continue the flow with a legal process whereby they can end up with citizenship and vote.