Scientists say giants existed

[d taylor]

Has he ever investigated it? I haven't watched all his videos. Some are very lengthy.

Here is a facebook post i found of his, I am not on facebook but was able to read this.

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=883880424980461&id=225928674108976

 

[Lost4words]

If you listen to the video... These guys are talking about skelletons much taller than that. The one guy even asks why this has been ignored....
There is evidence for a history that has been kept from us.
It's not pure fantasy.

Its all pure, made up, fantasy.

If 'really' tall, massive 'giants' existed, then there would be many skeletons in museums etc.

The only big skeletons that we see today are fake and photoshopped!

 

[JacksBratt]

Yep. A television show that's only as reliable as the people who edit it, who don't know much about science and who do know that the product they sell is an audience that they have to keep interested.

I'm pretty sure that the people that were interviewed...are knowledgeable and credible. If we dismiss the credibility of the person being interviewed... due to the supposed knowledge of the one giving the interview... We might as well stop interviews.

Let me put it this way... If a scientist who denied the existence of giants... was on a "television" show and had letters after their name and worked for an accredited university.... you would listen to them... right?

 

[d taylor]

I'm pretty sure that the people that were interviewed...are knowledgeable and credible. If we dismiss the credibility of the person being interviewed... due to the supposed knowledge of the one giving the interview... We might as well stop interviews.

Let me put it this way... If a scientist who denied the existence of giants... was on a "television" show and had letters after their name and worked for an accredited university.... you would listen to them... right?

I wonder posters like the one you are replying to i wonder what their evolution stance is. I wound think they believe it, so anything that questions science is automatically dismissed.

 

[JacksBratt]

Here is a facebook post i found of his, I am not on facebook but was able to read this.

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=883880424980461&id=225928674108976

Thanks.
I wonder if he just stays away from that. Not out of trying to avoid it, but by the simple fact that he is so immersed in the topic that he does investigate.
I still think that the information and evidence that he presents is awesome. I am not going to write him off for not taking a stance on one topic.

Rob Skiba didn't believe in the Pre Trib Rapture.
AZ Marzulli also presents awesome topics and information..

I don't agree 100% with anyone.. and that's the benefit of being free.

 

[JacksBratt]

Its all pure, made up, fantasy.

If 'really' tall, massive 'giants' existed, then there would be many skeletons in museums etc.

The only big skeletons that we see today are fake and photoshopped!

Well, Lost, there were skeletons. The Smithsonian even mentioned them. However, it's pretty easy to cover things up if you have all the evidence.
There are also all kinds of news paper articles from the 1800's talking about them.
Not all the pictures are photo-shopped.

But.. if you want to dismiss them, it's your right.

I do find it hypocritical however that scientists still use Piltdown Man, Lucy and other totally proven fakes... to try to fabricate the missing link... while on the other side, actual skeletal evidence that is genuine, is destroyed or hidden...

Then, when DNA comes out, people dismiss that too.

 

[Lost4words]

Well, Lost, there were skeletons. The Smithsonian even mentioned them. However, it's pretty easy to cover things up if you have all the evidence.
There are also all kinds of news paper articles from the 1800's talking about them.
Not all the pictures are photo-shopped.

But.. if you want to dismiss them, it's your right.

I do find it hypocritical however that scientists still use Piltdown Man, Lucy and other totally proven fakes... to try to fabricate the missing link... while on the other side, actual skeletal evidence that is genuine, is destroyed or hidden...

Then, when DNA comes out, people dismiss that too.

Well, i can understand your reasoning as you also believe in a flat earth!

All pure fantasy my friend.

There are no 'real' gigantic human bones!

 

[Lost4words]

@JacksBratt
Anyway, back on topic....

Any 'giant' human skeletons documented are utter fakes. There are no 'Gigantic' human skeletons.

There are so many gullible people in the world these days.

And, they usually all are into believing these type of fantastic stories. Like it or not, that is the truth my friend.

 

[JacksBratt]

Anyway, back on topic....

Any 'giant' human skeletons documented are utter fakes. There are no 'Gigantic' human skeletons.

There are so many gullible people in the world these days.

And, they usually all are into believing these type of fantastic stories. Like it or not, that is the truth my friend.

Thanks, so much, for being and adult and apologizing.

I am so sorry that you have such a closed mind..

One could argue as to who it is that is gullible.. those that open their minds to presented evidence and weigh it on the balance of validity...

OR

Those that listen to one agenda and go about their daily lives living without testing what they are told.

Don't be like this: Potatoes were Illegal in France between 1748 and 1772

You can starve to death on loyalty to those keeping the truth from you.

In the 16th Century the Spanish conquered the Inca Empire in South America, with this they returned to Europe with a new vegetable; the potato. However, this new produce was not so easily adopted by the rest of Europe, farmers in France in particular were very distrustful.

The farmers considered the vegetable strange and poisonous, even as going as far as claiming the potato caused leprosy and other terrible diseases. The potato was only given to their farm animals and even the poorest, starving peasants were afraid to eat them. The French government was so concerned about the potatoes ill effects that the production and consumption of potatoes was eventually outlawed by the French Parliament in 1748.

Potatoes remained illegal to grow and consume in France for many years until a medical army officer named Antoine Auguste Parmentier was captured by the Prussians during the 7 Year War with England in 1771. Whilst imprisoned Parmentier and his fellow prisoners were fed only potatoes by his captors and, to his surprise, he noted no ill effects as noted by the his government and learned that their perceptions were, in fact, false.

 

[Lost4words]

Thanks, so much, for being and adult and apologizing.

I am so sorry that you have such a closed mind..

One could argue as to who it is that is gullible.. those that open their minds to presented evidence and weigh it on the balance of validity...

OR

Those that listen to one agenda and go about their daily lives living without testing what they are told.

Don't be like this: Potatoes were Illegal in France between 1748 and 1772

You can starve to death on loyalty to those keeping the truth from you.

In the 16th Century the Spanish conquered the Inca Empire in South America, with this they returned to Europe with a new vegetable; the potato. However, this new produce was not so easily adopted by the rest of Europe, farmers in France in particular were very distrustful.

The farmers considered the vegetable strange and poisonous, even as going as far as claiming the potato caused leprosy and other terrible diseases. The potato was only given to their farm animals and even the poorest, starving peasants were afraid to eat them. The French government was so concerned about the potatoes ill effects that the production and consumption of potatoes was eventually outlawed by the French Parliament in 1748.

Potatoes remained illegal to grow and consume in France for many years until a medical army officer named Antoine Auguste Parmentier was captured by the Prussians during the 7 Year War with England in 1771. Whilst imprisoned Parmentier and his fellow prisoners were fed only potatoes by his captors and, to his surprise, he noted no ill effects as noted by the his government and learned that their perceptions were, in fact, false.

Far from being closed my friend, its rather very open to 'REALITY' and truth and not fables and fantastical nonsense...

Youtube is awash with people spouting utter lies and untruths in all manner of subjects.

The gullible and easily led, flock to such people.

God bless you my friend

 

[Think...]

A 6ft plus guy in ancient times would have been seen as a giant. Anything else is pure fantasy...

Oh, Lord.

Is that because man hadn't straightened his posture, and grown tall, enough from living in trees and caves yet?

 

[Think...]

There have been threads on here before in regards to the existence of giants and the Smithsonian cover ups etc. People argued that the pictures were not real... which, in all reality, many were not. But, many were real. So were the news paper articles stating that huge skeletons had been found in the US.

People argued and argued. Now, there is actual proof that scientists at universities have done DNA work that has left them no choice but to admit that giants were real.

In the video I have posted, the one guy even admits that it was ignored because it didn't fit with the history that they wanted to present.

Tell me what you think.

I'm convinced there were Giants, but pretty leery of anything from the History channel.

Must have some unbiblical twist to it somewhere in its explanation.

Chew carefully.

 

[JacksBratt]

I'm convinced there were Giants, but pretty leery of anything from the History channel.

Must have some unbiblical twist to it somewhere in its explanation.

Chew carefully.

Yes, they have an "unbiblical explanation" which has to do with their only "fall back"... Aliens.

I didn't post it because of the explanation that they give.

I posted it for the simple fact that they say the quiet thing out loud..

They ask why it has never been told or exposed before and the explanation is that it didn't fit the narrative.

Which is what we have been saying all the time... if the archeologists find something that doesn't fit their predetermined depiction of history.. It is discredited, hidden, tossed or blamed on aliens.

To hear them finally admit that the DNA from the skeletons, skulls and other beings that they find... are not human and that they are large in size... is a huge step forward away from denying that they even existed.

 

[Astrid]

There have been threads on here before in regards to the existence of giants and the Smithsonian cover ups etc. People argued that the pictures were not real... which, in all reality, many were not. But, many were real. So were the news paper articles stating that huge skeletons had been found in the US.

People argued and argued. Now, there is actual proof that scientists at universities have done DNA work that has left them no choice but to admit that giants were real.

In the video I have posted, the one guy even admits that it was ignored because it didn't fit with the history that they wanted to present.

Tell me what you think.

History Channel is a shameful fraud.

 

[Astrid]

A 6ft plus guy in ancient times would have been seen as a giant. Anything else is pure fantasy...

People who believe in such things
as Nessie, Bigfoot or giants despite
there there being zero evidence for
them are demonstrating how naive
and gullible they are, and giving reason
to doubt their credibility in anything they say.

 

[Lost4words]

People who believe in such things
as Nessie, Bigfoot or giants despite
there there being zero evidence for
them are demonstrating how naive
and gullible they are, and giving reason
to doubt their credibility in anything they say.

The only big foot i have seen is fom Billy the Rottweiler next door!!!!

 

[JacksBratt]

History Channel is a shameful fraud.

That may be. However, it doesn't mean that the scientists that they interview are frauds. These are real people with real degress and real research.

 

[JacksBratt]

People who believe in such things
as Nessie, Bigfoot or giants despite
there there being zero evidence for
them are demonstrating how naive
and gullible they are, and giving reason
to doubt their credibility in anything they say.

No evidence?

How tall do you think that the person who had this skull would have been.. Anyone of normal stature would have never been able to walk around with a head this size.

Not only that, but it is missing the common sutures of bone that every single human skull has.. bar none. Also, the Foramen Magnum ( the hole where the spinal cord enters the skull to connects to the brain.. is in the wrong spot.

None of these can be caused by the practice of "cradle boarding" which cannot increase skull volume, move the foramen magnum or change the sutures.

This is one of many many giant skulls found around the world. Some have had their DNA tested as well... Not human.

 

[Handmaid for Jesus]

Tell me what you think.

I think people should come to grips with the existence of giant humans, like the Dinka tribe of South Sudan.

 

[JacksBratt]

I think people should come to grips with the existence of giant humans, like the Dinka tribe of South Sudan.

Yes.. these and the ones that the bible speaks about.. Not just Goliath. Goliath had 4 brothers and you can bet that they weren't just accidentally huge and gigantic.