Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
are you saying that a typical car isnt colser to other car then to a truck?
what is the problem?
Maybe in the lala-land you live in. Over here in the real world, we can't.we can claim for multiple origins of species or convergent evolution.
Do you retract your claim then? Because it looks like you are just making things up, which suggests you should be neither criticizing nor teaching.
Can't recall.What question?
Can't recall.
You can remind me by making a statement of evolution. Then you will see hard questions.
There’s a YouTuber channel called How Creationism Taught Me Real Science. He goes over creationist explanations of natural phenomena and then compares them to what mainstream scientists have really learned about the subject .I am an Old Earth Creationist and do not believe in what I've learned is macro-evolution; micro-evolution from what I understand is about gene mutation and natural selection and definitely can be observed and documented. Admittedly I am no science expert!
With that said, I am desiring to read some "pro evolution" articles to give me an idea of what most scientists and non-Creationists believe. Right now I'm already in the middle of a few books but if any of you can suggest a layman's book about the topic I'd be open to reading it in the future. My strength is definitely not science so any resources that get real technical are going to be above my head.
This thread is definitely NOT about debate so please refrain from voicing such opinions.
There’s a YouTuber channel called How Creationism Taught Me Real Science. He goes over creationist explanations of natural phenomena and then compares them to what mainstream scientists have really learned about the subject .
Creationists don't have any hard questions concerning evolution.
There you go, there's a statement of evolution...waiting to see hard questions.
What is evolution?
The change in the frequency of alleles in a population over time, due to mutation, natural selection, genetic drift, and gene flow.
So....we're at about 6th grade level so far...care to ramp it up a bit?
If so, would this change have a clear direction?
I never make things up. I just make conclusions based on answers I got back from evolutionist.
For example, a biologist would tell you that macroevolution is just speciation. ( they were a different species)
Toward better fitness relative to environmental pressures, but it can take any of many routes to achieve that fitness.
Next?
Yeah, sure. So those "failures" of the nested hierarchy you mentioned were your conclusions based on what?
It was contained in his definition (post #109).So evolution is "controlled" by environment. Right?
If so, why not add this critical condition to the definition of evolution?
So evolution is "controlled" by environment. Right?
If so, why not add this critical condition to the definition of evolution?
Read what I am talking now to the 42 guy.
Wow. Have you heard of that Darwin fellow?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?