- Dec 1, 2011
- 20,450
- 16,455
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Others
yes.Is anything on a forum not propaganda?
Is anything in the news not propaganda ?
Upvote
0
yes.Is anything on a forum not propaganda?
Is anything in the news not propaganda ?
It's to memorialize the fact that the current evangelical position against abortion is not based on the Bible, but that it stems from politics only.fwiw, opinion about the apostasy of the person in your sig can casts aspersions or doubt on the integrity of your opinions.
[With friends like these.... great job likening the GOP to an older male relative.]
The pro-lifers caught the car they had been running after screaming for decades. The people get to decide! So far every time they have gotten to decide without a gerrymander filter it had been to keep something similar to what we had under Roe oddly enough…Roe v Wade should not have been overturned.
Democrat who ran heavily on abortion rights, IVF wins Alabama special election in state House race
Marilyn Lands won a decisive victory in a state House district that Donald Trump narrowly won in 2020
Roe v Wade should not have been overturned. Pro life can only truly be known on the individual level as part of knowing Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior which is a spiritual & evangelical, not secular, matter. If being pro abortion is so important, over other issues, to the secular mindset, then it must ultimately prefer death.
The Lord calls us to choose life over death ( Deuteronomy 30:11-20) which involves love of neighbor ( 1 John 2:7-11) but not to love the fallen world ( 1 John 2:15-17).
Let's read the link just a little:
At a closed-door meeting of Senate Republicans this week, the head of a super PAC closely aligned with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., presented poll results that suggested voters are reacting differently to commonly used terms like “pro-life” and “pro-choice” in the wake of last year’s Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, said several senators who were in the room.Sure sounds like they are talking about changing terminology. That shows in the title:
Republicans are trying to find a new term for ‘pro-life’ to stave off more electoral losses.
Not change position - not suddenly become pro choice - but changing terminology. The propaganda coming from the left, if anything, is effective in demonizing terms for people they do not agree with. This speaks strategy for new terminology not demonized.
another quote from the link:
“What intrigued me the most about the results was that ‘pro-choice’ and ‘pro-life’ means something different now, that people see being pro-life as being against all abortions ... at all levels,” Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., said in an interview Thursday.and another showing that they are speaking of changing terminology:
Asked whether senators were encouraged to use a term other than “pro-life,” Young said his “pro-baby” descriptor “was just a term of my creation to demonstrate my concern for babies.”So, before we start worrying - or glad handing - NO the Republicans are not changing their stance on abortion (thank you Jesus!), just looking at changing terminology.
The ultimate original intent ruling. If the founders intended for women to vote they would have made that clear so away with that amendment.Gee.
It would just be so easy to invalidate women's suffrage and outlaw abortion.
I think Alito and Thomas would be on board, and voter suppression is the GOP's winning formula.