Republicans are exploring a shift away from pro-life strategy after election losses

NxNW

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2019
4,940
3,623
NW
✟195,067.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Republicans are trying to find a new term for ‘pro-life’ to stave off more electoral losses

WASHINGTON — Republican strategists are exploring a shift away from “pro-life” messaging on abortion after consistent Election Day losses for the GOP when reproductive rights were on the ballot. At a closed-door meeting of Senate Republicans this week, the head of a super PAC closely aligned with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., presented poll results that suggested voters are reacting differently to commonly used terms like “pro-life” and “pro-choice” in the wake of last year’s Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, said several senators who were in the room.

“What intrigued me the most about the results was that ‘pro-choice’ and ‘pro-life’ means something different now, that people see being pro-life as being against all abortions ... at all levels,” Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., said in an interview Thursday.

A national strategist who worked on Senate races last year said: “The issue of abortion was problematic for Republicans last cycle, so it’s no surprise [the Senate Leadership Fund] is polling public perception of the issue. It’s the smart thing to do.”

Christina Reynolds, a spokesperson for Emily’s List, an organization that promotes female candidates who support abortion rights, said Republicans’ shift in messaging is “underestimating” voters’ understanding of the issue, adding that “wrapping it up nicely” would not change voters’ minds about abortion. “I think their messaging was not the problem. Their position is the problem, and they’re going to be stuck with those positions,” Reynolds said. “At the end of the day, voters are clear in poll after poll and in election results after election results that they believe that people should have the right to make their own health care decisions, that they support abortion rights, that they supported Roe v. Wade.”
 

FenderTL5

Κύριε, ἐλέησον.
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2016
5,085
5,960
Nashville TN
✟634,456.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
16,657
10,467
Earth
✟143,249.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Opinion piece = Propaganda
Yeah, well see, now that Dobbs has superseded Roe/Casey, the GOP got caught flat-footed when “abortion issues” made it on to ballots across the land and the people voted for a woman’s right to choose whether or not to obtain abortion services.
That’s what the article was about, but if you wanna “ostrich” the issue, you’re certainly free to do so.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
16,657
10,467
Earth
✟143,249.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Republicans are trying to find a new term for ‘pro-life’ to stave off more electoral losses

WASHINGTON — Republican strategists are exploring a shift away from “pro-life” messaging on abortion after consistent Election Day losses for the GOP when reproductive rights were on the ballot. At a closed-door meeting of Senate Republicans this week, the head of a super PAC closely aligned with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., presented poll results that suggested voters are reacting differently to commonly used terms like “pro-life” and “pro-choice” in the wake of last year’s Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, said several senators who were in the room.

“What intrigued me the most about the results was that ‘pro-choice’ and ‘pro-life’ means something different now, that people see being pro-life as being against all abortions ... at all levels,” Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., said in an interview Thursday.

A national strategist who worked on Senate races last year said: “The issue of abortion was problematic for Republicans last cycle, so it’s no surprise [the Senate Leadership Fund] is polling public perception of the issue. It’s the smart thing to do.”

Christina Reynolds, a spokesperson for Emily’s List, an organization that promotes female candidates who support abortion rights, said Republicans’ shift in messaging is “underestimating” voters’ understanding of the issue, adding that “wrapping it up nicely” would not change voters’ minds about abortion. “I think their messaging was not the problem. Their position is the problem, and they’re going to be stuck with those positions,” Reynolds said. “At the end of the day, voters are clear in poll after poll and in election results after election results that they believe that people should have the right to make their own health care decisions, that they support abortion rights, that they supported Roe v. Wade.”
Don’t we already have a thread on this?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Desk trauma

The pickles are up to something
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
20,434
16,441
✟1,191,657.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Don’t we already have a thread on this?
No, it was mentioned in another thread about the Californian Republican Party but this is the only dedicated thread.
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Psalm 144:1
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
140,192
25,222
55
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,729,308.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
You can say that again.

Babies born are on their own, no matter how difficult their circumstances.
What on earth does that have to do with my comment?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Hammster

Psalm 144:1
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
140,192
25,222
55
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,729,308.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Your comment was that Republicans were never pro-life? It certainly does. Pro-life needs to encompass a person's life span, not end at birth.
Seriously? That’s what you took away from my comment? ::doh:
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
30,679
18,559
Orlando, Florida
✟1,262,323.00
Country
United States
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Politics
US-Democrat
Yeah, well see, now that Dobbs has superseded Roe/Casey, the GOP got caught flat-footed when “abortion issues” made it on to ballots across the land and the people voted for a woman’s right to choose whether or not to obtain abortion services.
That’s what the article was about, but if you wanna “ostrich” the issue, you’re certainly free to do so.

Republicans haven't been paying attention to national polls, I guess. Americans views on abortion are overwhelmingly complicated, to say the least, and they've only become less sympathetic to absolutist positions opposing abortion, not more favorable, as time has passed.

What did they think would happen when they outlaw abortion, exactly? Did they just assume the charisma of a strongman politician was going to overwhelm fundamental bread and butter issues as family planning? Especially given the fact half of this country is being raked over the coals and stretched in a rack in the new "gig economy"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fantine
Upvote 0

hislegacy

Memories pre 2021
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
43,929
14,018
Broken Arrow, OK
✟702,993.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Let's read the link just a little:

At a closed-door meeting of Senate Republicans this week, the head of a super PAC closely aligned with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., presented poll results that suggested voters are reacting differently to commonly used terms like “pro-life” and “pro-choice” in the wake of last year’s Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, said several senators who were in the room.
Sure sounds like they are talking about changing terminology. That shows in the title:

Republicans are trying to find a new term for ‘pro-life’ to stave off more electoral losses.​


Not change position - not suddenly become pro choice - but changing terminology. The propaganda coming from the left, if anything, is effective in demonizing terms for people they do not agree with. This speaks strategy for new terminology not demonized.

another quote from the link:

“What intrigued me the most about the results was that ‘pro-choice’ and ‘pro-life’ means something different now, that people see being pro-life as being against all abortions ... at all levels,” Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., said in an interview Thursday.​
and another showing that they are speaking of changing terminology:

Asked whether senators were encouraged to use a term other than “pro-life,” Young said his “pro-baby” descriptor “was just a term of my creation to demonstrate my concern for babies.”​
So, before we start worrying - or glad handing - NO the Republicans are not changing their stance on abortion (thank you Jesus!), just looking at changing terminology.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,295
36,611
Los Angeles Area
✟830,378.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
So, before we start worrying - or glad handing - NO the Republicans are not changing their stance on abortion (thank you Jesus!), just looking at changing terminology.

The 2016 GOP platform (the most recent one that exists) reads in part:

Protecting Human Life
The Constitution’s guarantee that no one can “be deprived of life, liberty or property” deliberately echoes the Declaration of Independence’s proclamation that “all” are “endowed by their Creator” with the inalienable right to life. Accordingly, we assert the sanctity of human life and affirm that the unborn child has a fundamental right to life which cannot be infringed. We support a human life amendment to the Constitution and legislation to make clear that the Fourteenth Amendment’s protections apply to children before birth.


This is a pretty extreme position, that doesn't seem to leave any room for exceptions (or for states to make their own decisions). The thrust of the article seems to be finding a way to signal an acceptance for various exceptions to a complete abortion ban, and what to call it. This does seem to be a change in position at least for the national party. Individual politicians have obviously staked their own personal positions for a long time.
 
Upvote 0