My response in blue:
No, unconditional love does not mean no disagreement and acceptance of everything.
The knowing is a discernment of what is true.In that truth, there is a knowing of why of things have changed, and there is no disagreements to be resolved. Unconditional love is about accepting everything, what is true or not, as it is.
For instance, if a father loves his son unconditionally, but the son has a psychological disorder, and believes he is a dolphin, the parent does not have to accept that the child is a dolphin in order to love the child.
The truth is that the child thinks he is a dolphin and being unconditional is to allow him to think that.
In this instance the poster's wife believes he is a pervert anytime he initiates sex with his wife. He does not have to accept this conclusion to love her unconditionally.
Why not? It is her conclusion and not his. She is entitled to have her conclusions whether it is true or not. Not accepting this is placing a condition on both her and you (conditional love).
The parent disagrees with his child that the child is a dolphin. The poster disagrees with his wife that he is a pervert for desiring sex with his wife. He does not have to void this disagreement to be in the Spirit, or to love her.
If he truly were in the Spirit, he would have discerned the deeper truth of the matter, as explained above.
The unconditional aspect of the love in question is that despite the fact that she thinks he is a pervert for having natural sexual desires, he still loves her.
Yes (my underlining).
Now the part of your initial argument that could have some validity is that he needs to guard against resentment where his love for his wife is dependent on receiving sex from her.
But he should disagree with her contention that he is a pervert for initiating sex with his spouse.
Only if he wants to be conditional about it and keep the recurring problem alive. If not, then let it go (accept it) and allow his wife to initiate sex instead. If he cannot wait for that to happen, then he is already conditional about it again.
Upvote
0