Real time or evo time?

[AirPo]

To endow someone with something requires someone or something endowing. That doesn't help you. Gong!

No it doesn't, but thanks for playing.

 

[TLK Valentine]

The rule of evidence is that you need some. You have NO DNA from pre KT. (where I reckon that the flood era was near). You have diddly squat. Talking about court cases in recent history is disingenuous.

You have no evidence for a flood... just an anonymous story.

 

[TLK Valentine]

Since you evidence that science cannot tell us about the former nature, no one really cares if you disbelieve the Almighty or not, because He dun told us the future and past.

What former nature? The rule of evidence is that you need some.

 

[TLK Valentine]

I was working with what geology and other so called sciences preach, that the present is claimed to be the key to it all.



That would be Jesus.

It is an extension of the truth and life of God and is alive!


Not the way it would here. Not in heaven.

Gold will be clear then, transparent. That is further evidence nature is different!


Exactly, so forget radioactivity...that is of this present state. Get it yet?
It is caused by the forces and laws in place now. You get that much??

I get that you're blathering about things without evidence.

 

[Loudmouth]

Because the ratios came about by creation, and then the different nature in the past, as well as to a small small degree by today's nature. Today's nature is just a little piggy backer. It had to work with what was here, and do so in a way that God ordered for the new nature. That means seamlessly. Notice Noah spanned both natures?

Why would creation produce the same ratios as the present state?

 

[Derek Meyer]

I was working with what geology and other so called sciences preach, that the present is claimed to be the key to it all.

Really? How on earth did you get to that conclusion? I think that you're not telling the truth about the natural science of geology here.

 

[AirPo]

Really? How on earth did you get to that conclusion? I think that you're not telling the truth about the natural science of geology here.

It was made up. That is what The HI Theroy is all about. It's the first law.

 

[dad]

No it doesn't, but thanks for playing.

To be endowed with a gift requires someone or something doing the giving or endowing. It isn't up for a vote.

 

[dad]

By "The opinion" I meant the scientific one.

That changes with the wind. It also is worthless. You need to show the basis for your claim and the support, not allude to some opinion.

Yes, it's unscriptural. That's because I am of the opinion that the majority of scripture is false. I used evidence that I accept to be true. "You cannot do time well." Meaning? What is the basis for my "time claims"? Also, they aren't "a religious joke" as you put it. They are scientific truths, absolutely provable by science.

False. Provable??!! What a joke. They are religious twaddle. Show the basis for any deep time claim on earth and we will see.

No, I would never use their perspectives because I am of the opinion that neither exist. I meant the perspectives of current, information age man and ancient, bronze age man.

You have an opinion, wow. Ignorance based opinion at that.

Firstly, although Pangaea existed, it was not in existence when humans were around.

Prove it or lose the claim. If the different nature in the far past did not allow man to leave remains like fossils, how would you know??!

Pangaea was formed about 270 million years ago, and broke up about 200 million years ago.

Totally imaginary years and time. No basis in reality, they are based solely on a belief that our state existed along with it's forces and laws that cause radioactive decay.

As mentioned in my post about dinosaurs, humans ( referring to homo sapiens ) first arose about 200,000 years ago. 200,000<200,000,000. Considering that humans several thousand years ago had little to no effective medicine, used bronze tools as opposed to any stronger metal, and believed the Earth was flat, among other things, they were not smarter than us. The edges of Pangaea weren't well know until very recently, within the last hundred years in fact.

Mankind was here from the start. You have no basis for your fantasy claims. If you think you do, get to it man, time is a wastin.

1) Fossilization is not selective in which animals it fossilizes.

Not now. Irrelevant. Totally.

2) Humans couldn't fossilize 70 mya because they didn't exist that long ago.

Circular logic. 'We know they were not here because they didn't fossilize as our laws would have them do'. You are peddling religion here. Fables.

3) Every animal with a skeleton (regular or exoskeleton, it doesn't matter) can have fossilized given the right environmental conditions.

Now...maybe. However in a different state past where little and large animals and bacteria like little thingies may have specialized in rapidly disposing of certain life forms, that would not be the case.

Science uses clear criteria for dates, that much is true. However, I can say that christians use even clearer criteria for dates based on godly balderdash ( the previous statement does not make either of us right,nor is it an attempt to do so. ) . You still have provided no evidence for why science is wrong, or christians are right.

Billions of us over time do not think Christ rising from the dead is balderdash. They even set the year to His life. The prophesies are tested fulfilled, a done deal. Proven over and over and over and over.

Now stop trying to compare your so called science belief system which is religious twaddle with actual solid beliefs.

 

[AirPo]

To be endowed with a gift requires someone or something doing the giving or endowing. It isn't up for a vote.

No it doesn't. It isn't up to you.

 

[dad]

No it doesn't. It isn't up to you.

A gift is given. Face it.

 

[AirPo]

A gift is given. Face it.

You've been defeated. Face it.

 

[dad]

You've been defeated. Face it.

To post requires a poster. To be defeated requires someone or something to do the defeating. A gift requires a giver. To be endowed means something ot someone did some endowing. Etc. How sweet it is.

 

[AirPo]

To post requires a poster.

And ... I didn't use the word post. Trying tmake things up?

To be defeated requires someone or something to do the defeating.

I'm AirPo, The Defeator. Nice to meet you.

A gift requires a giver.

No, it doesn't, as I have shown.

To be endowed means something ot someone did some endowing. Etc. How sweet it is.

I didn't use the word endow either. Making things up may work for The HI Theory, , but not in the semantics game.

 

[dad]

No. The gift of writing science fiction is natural.

Natural? Feel free to make things up Were your Christmas presents all natural too?

 

[dad]

I didn't use the word endow either.

That involves giving FYI

en·dow
inˈdou,enˈdou/
verb
past tense: endowed; past participle: endowed

1. give or bequeath an income or property to (a person or institution).
   "he endowed the church with lands"

 

[AirPo]

Natural? Feel free to make things up Were your Christmas presents all natural too?

No, but then again, logic is not a requirement of The HI theory.

 

[AirPo]

That involves giving FYI

en·dow
inˈdou,enˈdou/
verb
past tense: endowed; past participle: endowed

1. give or bequeath an income or property to (a person or institution).
   "he endowed the church with lands"

Again, no it doesn't.

 

[dad]

Again, no it doesn't.

Explain how one gets a gift with no one or noting giving that gift then.

 

[AirPo]

Explain how one gets a gift with no one or noting giving that gift then.

Been there, done that. One of the most valueable test taking skills I learned in school was to go back and check your work for errors. Good advice since the most obviuos errors are sometimes the easiest to make. I suggest doing the same as it would be a much better learning expierence for you rather than me explaining it yet again.