Real time or evo time?

[dad]

Been there, done that. One of the most valueable test taking skills I learned in school was to go back and check your work for errors. Good advice since the most obviuos errors are sometimes the easiest to make. I suggest doing the same as it would be a much better learning expierence for you rather than me explaining it yet again.

So if one has a gift, it is given.

 

[AirPo]

So if one has a gift, it is given.

Incorrect, try again. Want a hint?

 

[dad]

Incorrect, try again. Want a hint?

A gift, does it require a giver?

 

[AirPo]

A gift, does it require a giver?

Not necessarily, as I have already pointed out.

 

[dad]

Not necessarily, as I have already pointed out.

Then it is not a gift. Guess that needs to be pointed out to you.

 

[AirPo]

Then it is not a gift. Guess that needs to be pointed out to you.

Not true at all, as has been pointed out already. Don't just face the defeate, embrrace it!

 

[dad]

Not true at all, as has been pointed out already. Don't just face the defeate, embrrace it!

A gift needs a giver. Face it.

 

[AirPo]

A gift needs a giver. Face it.

No it doesn't. Face it.

 

[dad]

No it doesn't. Face it.

Yes, a gift requires a giver of some kind. Name any gift that doesn't?

 

[AirPo]

Yes, a gift requires a giver of some kind. Name any gift that doesn't?

Face it, I did already. Defeated !

 

[dad]

Face it, I did already. Defeated !

Soon as you prove a gift needs no source or giver, I can cede the point. That won't happen, and even if it did, I would be undefeated. Victory does not meaning knowing it all.

 

[AirPo]

Soon as you prove a gift needs no source or giver, I can cede the point. That won't happen, and even if it did, I would be undefeated. Victory does not meaning knowing it all.

Face it, I did already. Defeated already.

 

[dad]

Face it, I did already. Defeated already.

Fluff and time wasting nonsense aside, a gift does require a giver.

 

[Loudmouth]

Fluff and time wasting nonsense aside, a gift does require a giver.

You are defeated by this simple question.

In a former state, if the U/Pb ratio in an igneous rock is 0.5, what would the K/Ar ratio be, and why?

 

[dad]

You are defeated by this simple question.

In a former state, if the U/Pb ratio in an igneous rock is 0.5, what would the K/Ar ratio be, and why?

Gibberish...unless you relate that to why any ratios are expected with your beliefs.

 

[Loudmouth]

Gibberish...unless you relate that to why any ratios are expected with your beliefs.

They aren't my beliefs. They are direct observations. We can directly observe the ratios that the present state produces. We can directly observe the ratios in rocks.

 

[dad]

They aren't my beliefs. They are direct observations. We can directly observe the ratios that the present state produces. We can directly observe the ratios in rocks.

It is not the rates that do and must exist in THIS state that are beliefs.

 

[Loudmouth]

It is not the rates that do and must exist in THIS state that are beliefs.

I am only using the observed rates and the observed ratios to reach my conclusion. No beliefs required.

 

[AirPo]

Fluff and time wasting nonsense aside, a gift does require a giver.

How can you put aside the most important part of The HI Theory. Especially while maintaining that a gift must have a giver after that has been shown to be false?

 

[Kylie]

Imaginary time used by science (we can call it evo time here) is based on a belief that physics always existed as we know it basically.

In real time I suspect the flood was around 4500 years ago. IN evo time probably about 70 million years ago at the aprox time of the KT boundry.

There is no way to know if man and most animals would heave been even able to fossilize in the former nature. Science uses beliefs on top of assumptions on top of godless beliefs to set dates and model the past. They are wrong.

How do you account for the fact that several completely different dating methods all give the same value for the length of time since the KT boundary (about 65 million years) when you claim it has only been 4500?